Literature DB >> 22436639

Geometry strongly influences the response of numerical models of the lumbar spine--a probabilistic finite element analysis.

Frank Niemeyer1, Hans-Joachim Wilke, Hendrik Schmidt.   

Abstract

Typical FE models of the human lumbar spine consider a single, fixed geometry. Such models cannot account for potential effects of the natural variability of the spine's geometry. In this study, we performed a probabilistic uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of a fully parameterized, geometrically simplified model of the L3-L4 segment. We examined the impact of the uncertainty in all 40 geometry parameters, estimated lower and upper bounds for the required sample size and determined the most important geometry parameters. The natural variability of the spine's geometry indeed strongly affects intradiscal pressure, range of motion and facet joint contact forces. Deriving generalized statements from fixed-geometry models as well as transferring those results to different cases thus can easily lead to wrong conclusions and should only be performed with extreme caution. We recommend a sample size of ≈ 100 to obtain reasonable accurate point estimates and a sufficient overview of the remaining uncertainties. Yet, only few parameters, especially those determining the disc geometry (disc height, end-plate width and depth) and the facets' position (intra-articular space, pedicle length, facet angles), proved to be truly important. Accurate measurement and modeling of those structures should therefore be prioritized.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22436639     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.02.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  19 in total

1.  Morphometry of the lower lumbar intervertebral discs and endplates: comparative analyses of new MRI data with previous findings.

Authors:  Ruoliang Tang; Celal Gungor; Richard F Sesek; Kenneth Bo Foreman; Sean Gallagher; Gerard A Davis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Characteristic morphological patterns within adolescent idiopathic scoliosis may be explained by mechanical loading.

Authors:  Benedikt Schlager; Florian Krump; Julius Boettinger; Frank Niemeyer; Michael Ruf; Sebastian Kleiner; Meinrad Beer; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  A database of lumbar spinal mechanical behavior for validation of spinal analytical models.

Authors:  Ian A F Stokes; Mack Gardner-Morse
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Computer simulation and image guidance for individualised dynamic spinal stabilization.

Authors:  S R Kantelhardt; U Hausen; M Kosterhon; A N Amr; K Gruber; A Giese
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-01-04       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 5.  Subject-specific analysis of joint contact mechanics: application to the study of osteoarthritis and surgical planning.

Authors:  Corinne R Henak; Andrew E Anderson; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 6.  Ageing and degenerative changes of the intervertebral disc and their impact on spinal flexibility.

Authors:  Fabio Galbusera; Marc van Rijsbergen; Keita Ito; Jacques M Huyghe; Marco Brayda-Bruno; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Human L3L4 intervertebral disc mean 3D shape, modes of variation, and their relationship to degeneration.

Authors:  John M Peloquin; Jonathon H Yoder; Nathan T Jacobs; Sung M Moon; Alexander C Wright; Edward J Vresilovic; Dawn M Elliott
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Lumbar model generator: a tool for the automated generation of a parametric scalable model of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  C E Lavecchia; D M Espino; K M Moerman; K M Tse; D Robinson; P V S Lee; D E T Shepherd
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Asymmetrical intrapleural pressure distribution: a cause for scoliosis? A computational analysis.

Authors:  Benedikt Schlager; Frank Niemeyer; Fabio Galbusera; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Validation and application of an intervertebral disc finite element model utilizing independently constructed tissue-level constitutive formulations that are nonlinear, anisotropic, and time-dependent.

Authors:  Nathan T Jacobs; Daniel H Cortes; John M Peloquin; Edward J Vresilovic; Dawn M Elliott
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.