Literature DB >> 29730494

Brain extraction from normal and pathological images: A joint PCA/Image-Reconstruction approach.

Xu Han1, Roland Kwitt2, Stephen Aylward3, Spyridon Bakas4, Bjoern Menze5, Alexander Asturias6, Paul Vespa7, John Van Horn6, Marc Niethammer8.   

Abstract

Brain extraction from 3D medical images is a common pre-processing step. A variety of approaches exist, but they are frequently only designed to perform brain extraction from images without strong pathologies. Extracting the brain from images exhibiting strong pathologies, for example, the presence of a brain tumor or of a traumatic brain injury (TBI), is challenging. In such cases, tissue appearance may substantially deviate from normal tissue appearance and hence violates algorithmic assumptions for standard approaches to brain extraction; consequently, the brain may not be correctly extracted. This paper proposes a brain extraction approach which can explicitly account for pathologies by jointly modeling normal tissue appearance and pathologies. Specifically, our model uses a three-part image decomposition: (1) normal tissue appearance is captured by principal component analysis (PCA), (2) pathologies are captured via a total variation term, and (3) the skull and surrounding tissue is captured by a sparsity term. Due to its convexity, the resulting decomposition model allows for efficient optimization. Decomposition and image registration steps are alternated to allow statistical modeling of normal tissue appearance in a fixed atlas coordinate system. As a beneficial side effect, the decomposition model allows for the identification of potentially pathological areas and the reconstruction of a quasi-normal image in atlas space. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on four datasets: the publicly available IBSR and LPBA40 datasets which show normal image appearance, the BRATS dataset containing images with brain tumors, and a dataset containing clinical TBI images. We compare the performance with other popular brain extraction models: ROBEX, BEaST, MASS, BET, BSE and a recently proposed deep learning approach. Our model performs better than these competing approaches on all four datasets. Specifically, our model achieves the best median (97.11) and mean (96.88) Dice scores over all datasets. The two best performing competitors, ROBEX and MASS, achieve scores of 96.23/95.62 and 96.67/94.25 respectively. Hence, our approach is an effective method for high quality brain extraction for a wide variety of images.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain extraction; Image registration; PCA; Pathology; Total-variation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29730494      PMCID: PMC6036616          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.04.073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  30 in total

1.  BrainSuite: an automated cortical surface identification tool.

Authors:  David W Shattuck; Richard M Leahy
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 8.545

2.  MP RAGE: a three-dimensional, T1-weighted, gradient-echo sequence--initial experience in the brain.

Authors:  M Brant-Zawadzki; G D Gillan; W R Nitz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  BEaST: brain extraction based on nonlocal segmentation technique.

Authors:  Simon F Eskildsen; Pierrick Coupé; Vladimir Fonov; José V Manjón; Kelvin K Leung; Nicolas Guizard; Shafik N Wassef; Lasse Riis Østergaard; D Louis Collins
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Global image registration using a symmetric block-matching approach.

Authors:  Marc Modat; David M Cash; Pankaj Daga; Gavin P Winston; John S Duncan; Sébastien Ourselin
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-09-19

5.  Spatial normalization of brain images with focal lesions using cost function masking.

Authors:  M Brett; A P Leff; C Rorden; J Ashburner
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  N4ITK: improved N3 bias correction.

Authors:  Nicholas J Tustison; Brian B Avants; Philip A Cook; Yuanjie Zheng; Alexander Egan; Paul A Yushkevich; James C Gee
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Geometric metamorphosis.

Authors:  Marc Niethammer; Gabriel L Hart; Danielle F Pace; Paul M Vespa; Andrei Irimia; John D Van Horn; Stephen R Aylward
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2011

Review 8.  Fast robust automated brain extraction.

Authors:  Stephen M Smith
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Registration of Pathological Images.

Authors:  Xiao Yang; Xu Han; Eunbyung Park; Stephen Aylward; Roland Kwitt; Marc Niethammer
Journal:  Simul Synth Med Imaging       Date:  2016-09-23

Review 10.  FSL.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Mark W Woolrich; Stephen M Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  4 in total

1.  State-of-the-Art Traditional to the Machine- and Deep-Learning-Based Skull Stripping Techniques, Models, and Algorithms.

Authors:  Anam Fatima; Ahmad Raza Shahid; Basit Raza; Tahir Mustafa Madni; Uzair Iqbal Janjua
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  A Deep Network for Joint Registration and Reconstruction of Images with Pathologies.

Authors:  Xu Han; Zhengyang Shen; Zhenlin Xu; Spyridon Bakas; Hamed Akbari; Michel Bilello; Christos Davatzikos; Marc Niethammer
Journal:  Mach Learn Med Imaging       Date:  2020-09-29

3.  Automated brain extraction of multisequence MRI using artificial neural networks.

Authors:  Fabian Isensee; Marianne Schell; Irada Pflueger; Gianluca Brugnara; David Bonekamp; Ulf Neuberger; Antje Wick; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Sabine Heiland; Wolfgang Wick; Martin Bendszus; Klaus H Maier-Hein; Philipp Kickingereder
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Effect of data leakage in brain MRI classification using 2D convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Ekin Yagis; Selamawet Workalemahu Atnafu; Alba García Seco de Herrera; Chiara Marzi; Riccardo Scheda; Marco Giannelli; Carlo Tessa; Luca Citi; Stefano Diciotti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.