Literature DB >> 29729946

The probability of reciprocal monophyly of gene lineages in three and four species.

Rohan S Mehta1, Noah A Rosenberg2.   

Abstract

Reciprocal monophyly, a feature of a genealogy in which multiple groups of descendant lineages each consist of all of the descendants of their respective most recent common ancestors, has been an important concept in studies of species delimitation, phylogeography, population history reconstruction, systematics, and conservation. Computations involving the probability that reciprocal monophyly is observed in a genealogy have played a key role in criteria for defining taxonomic groups and inferring divergence times. The probability of reciprocal monophyly under a coalescent model of population divergence has been studied in detail for groups of gene lineages for pairs of species. Here, we extend this computation to generate corresponding probabilities for sets of gene lineages from three and four species. We study the effects of model parameters on the probability of reciprocal monophyly, finding that it is driven primarily by species tree height, with lesser but still substantial influences of internal branch lengths and sample sizes. We also provide an example application of our results to data from maize and teosinte.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coalescent; Gene trees; Monophyly; Species trees

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29729946      PMCID: PMC6215533          DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2018.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Popul Biol        ISSN: 0040-5809            Impact factor:   1.570


  29 in total

1.  Mathematical consequences of the genealogical species concept.

Authors:  Richard R Hudson; Jerry A Coyne
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Inferring the colonization of a mountain range--refugia vs. nunatak survival in high alpine ground beetles.

Authors:  Konrad Lohse; James A Nicholls; Graham N Stone
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  Gene tree distributions under the coalescent process.

Authors:  James H Degnan; Laura A Salter
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Integrating coalescent and ecological niche modeling in comparative phylogeography.

Authors:  Bryan C Carstens; Corinne L Richards
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  The shapes of neutral gene genealogies in two species: probabilities of monophyly, paraphyly, and polyphyly in a coalescent model.

Authors:  Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Genealogy of neutral genes in two partially isolated populations.

Authors:  N Takahata; M Slatkin
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 1.570

7.  The probability of monophyly of a sample of gene lineages on a species tree.

Authors:  Rohan S Mehta; David Bryant; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Gene genealogy in three related populations: consistency probability between gene and population trees.

Authors:  N Takahata
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Relationships between gene trees and species trees.

Authors:  P Pamilo; M Nei
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Non-neutral evolution and reciprocal monophyly of two expressed Mhc class II B genes in Leach's storm-petrel.

Authors:  Donald C Dearborn; Andrea B Gager; Morgan E Gilmour; Andrew G McArthur; Douglas A Hinerfeld; Robert A Mauck
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2014-11-23       Impact factor: 2.846

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Probability of Joint Monophyly of Samples of Gene Lineages for All Species in an Arbitrary Species Tree.

Authors:  Rohan S Mehta; Mike Steel; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 1.549

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.