Literature DB >> 12353748

Mathematical consequences of the genealogical species concept.

Richard R Hudson1, Jerry A Coyne.   

Abstract

A genealogical species is defined as a basal group of organisms whose members are all more closely related to each other than they are to any organisms outside the group ("exclusivity"), and which contains no exclusive group within it. In practice, a pair of species is so defined when phylogenies of alleles from a sample of loci shows them to be reciprocally monophyletic at all or some specified fraction of the loci. We investigate the length of time it takes to attain this status when an ancestral population divides into two descendant populations of equal size with no gene exchange, and when genetic drift and mutation are the only evolutionary forces operating. The number of loci used has a substantial effect on the probability of observing reciprocal monophyly at different times after population separation, with very long times needed to observe complete reciprocal monophyly for a large number of loci. In contrast, the number of alleles sampled per locus has a relatively small effect on the probability of reciprocal monophyly. Because a single mitochondrial or chloroplast locus becomes reciprocally monophyletic much faster than does a single nuclear locus, it is not advisable to use mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA to recognize genealogical species for long periods after population divergence. Using a weaker criterion of assigning genealogical species status when more than 50% of sampled nuclear loci show reciprocal monophyly, genealogical species status depends much less on the number of sampled loci, and is attained at roughly 4-7 N generations after populations are isolated, where N is the historically effective population size of each descendant. If genealogical species status is defined as more than 95% of sampled nuclear loci showing reciprocal monophyly, this status is attained after roughly 9-12 N generations.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12353748     DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01467.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  102 in total

1.  The causes of phylogenetic conflict in a classic Drosophila species group.

Authors:  Carlos A Machado; Jody Hey
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The probability and chromosomal extent of trans-specific polymorphism.

Authors:  Carsten Wiuf; Keyan Zhao; Hideki Innan; Magnus Nordborg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Evolving entities: towards a unified framework for understanding diversity at the species and higher levels.

Authors:  Timothy G Barraclough
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  DNA-based species delineation in tropical beetles using mitochondrial and nuclear markers.

Authors:  Michael T Monaghan; Michael Balke; T Ryan Gregory; Alfried P Vogler
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-10-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Speciation in birds: genes, geography, and sexual selection.

Authors:  Scott V Edwards; Sarah B Kingan; Jennifer D Calkins; Christopher N Balakrishnan; W Bryan Jennings; Willie J Swanson; Michael D Sorenson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-04-25       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Are subspecies useful in evolutionary and conservation biology?

Authors:  Albert B Phillimore; Ian P F Owens
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Wolbachia Acquisition by Drosophila yakuba-Clade Hosts and Transfer of Incompatibility Loci Between Distantly Related Wolbachia.

Authors:  Brandon S Cooper; Dan Vanderpool; William R Conner; Daniel R Matute; Michael Turelli
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Multilocus analysis of introgression between two sympatric sister species of Drosophila: Drosophila yakuba and D. santomea.

Authors:  Ana Llopart; Daniel Lachaise; Jerry A Coyne
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-06-18       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  A new approach to estimate parameters of speciation models with application to apes.

Authors:  Celine Becquet; Molly Przeworski
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  The probability of reciprocal monophyly of gene lineages in three and four species.

Authors:  Rohan S Mehta; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 1.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.