Literature DB >> 12940352

The shapes of neutral gene genealogies in two species: probabilities of monophyly, paraphyly, and polyphyly in a coalescent model.

Noah A Rosenberg1.   

Abstract

The genealogies of samples of orthologous regions from multiple species can be classified by their shapes. Using a neutral coalescent model of two species, I give exact probabilities of each of four possible genealogical shapes: reciprocal monophyly, two types of paraphyly, and polyphyly. After the divergence that forms two species, each of which has population size N, polyphyly is the most likely genealogical shape for the lineages of the two species. At approximately 1.300N generations after divergence, paraphyly becomes most likely, and reciprocal monophyly becomes most likely at approximately 1.665N generations. For a given species, the time at which 99% of its loci acquire monophyletic genealogies is approximately 5.298N generations, assuming all loci in its sister species are monophyletic. The probability that all lineages of two species are reciprocally monophyletic given that a sample from the two species has a reciprocally monophyletic genealogy increases rapidly with sample size, as does the probability that the most recent common ancestor (MRCA) for a sample is also the MRCA for all lineages from the two species. The results have potential applications for the testing of evolutionary hypotheses.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12940352     DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00355.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  45 in total

1.  iGLASS: an improvement to the GLASS method for estimating species trees from gene trees.

Authors:  Ethan M Jewett; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 1.479

Review 2.  Evolving entities: towards a unified framework for understanding diversity at the species and higher levels.

Authors:  Timothy G Barraclough
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Speciation slowing down in widespread and long-living tree taxa: insights from the tropical timber tree genus Milicia (Moraceae).

Authors:  K Daïnou; G Mahy; J Duminil; C W Dick; J-L Doucet; A S L Donkpégan; M Pluijgers; B Sinsin; P Lejeune; O J Hardy
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Speciation and DNA barcodes: testing the effects of dispersal on the formation of discrete sequence clusters.

Authors:  Anna Papadopoulou; Johannes Bergsten; Tomochika Fujisawa; Michael T Monaghan; Timothy G Barraclough; Alfried P Vogler
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-09-27       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Range instability leads to cytonuclear discordance in a morphologically cryptic ground squirrel species complex.

Authors:  Mark A Phuong; Ke Bi; Craig Moritz
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  The probability of reciprocal monophyly of gene lineages in three and four species.

Authors:  Rohan S Mehta; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 1.570

7.  Integrating phylogenetic and population genetic analyses of multiple loci to test species divergence hypotheses in Passerina buntings.

Authors:  Matt D Carling; Robb T Brumfield
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  AUGIST: inferring species trees while accommodating gene tree uncertainty.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Oliver
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Using population genetic theory and DNA sequences for species detection and identification in asexual organisms.

Authors:  C William Birky; Joshua Adams; Marlea Gemmel; Julia Perry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Reconstructing the evolutionary history of the radiation of the land snail genus Xerocrassa on Crete based on mitochondrial sequences and AFLP markers.

Authors:  Jan Sauer; Bernhard Hausdorf
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.