| Literature DB >> 35791435 |
Mohamed Sameer Hoosain1, Babu Sena Paul1, Susanna Kass2, Seeram Ramakrishna3.
Abstract
We are living in an age when data centers are expanding, require abundant spaces, and are an integral part in the urban communities, using massive amounts of environmental resources, and remains in the foreseeable future as the primary driver of the global energy consumption. This demand is disruptive and at times of both peril and opportunity due to impacts such as the COVID-19 pandemic, which is altering the demand of digital infrastructure around the world. With the global call for zero carbon emissions, there needs to be solutions put in place for the de-carbonization of data centers. New innovations are made available, which will have an economic, social, and environmental impact on data centers. Concepts such as circular economy and fourth industrial revolution technologies are useful procedural tools that can be used to systematically analyze data centers, control their mining and critical raw materials, can be utilized in the transition towards a sustainable and circular data center, by objectively assessing the environmental and economic impacts, and evaluating alternative options. In this paper, we will look at the current research and practice, the impact on the United Nations Sustainable Development goals, and look at future strides being taken towards more sustainable and circular data centers. We had discovered that decreasing the environmental effect and energy consumption of data centers is not sufficient. When it comes to data center architecture, both embodied and operational emissions are critical. Data centers also have a vital societal role in our daily lives, enabling us to share data and freely communicate via social media, transacting on the blockchain with cryptocurrencies, free online education, and job creation. As a result, sustainability and efficiency measures have expanded in a variety of ways, including circularity and its associated tools, as well as newer technologies.Entities:
Keywords: Circular economy (CE); Data centers; Fourth industrial revolution (4IR); Sustainability; United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UN-SDGs)
Year: 2022 PMID: 35791435 PMCID: PMC9247908 DOI: 10.1007/s43615-022-00191-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Circ Econ Sustain ISSN: 2730-597X
Fig. 1Estimated digital evolution percentage increase from 2018 to 2023 elaborated from [5]
The major industry standards developed for the data center
| Standard | Description |
|---|---|
| Uptime Institute’s tier standard | This standard develops a performance-based data center methodology during the design, construction, and commissioning phases to determine the facility’s resilience with respect to four tiers or redundancy/reliability levels |
| Telecommunication Infrastructure Standard for Data Centers (ANSI/TIA 942-A 2014) | This standard is more IT cable and network oriented with various infrastructure redundancy and reliability concepts based on the Uptime Institute’s tier standard |
| European standard (EN 50,600) | This standard consists of general concepts, building construction, power distribution, environmental control, telecommunications cabling infrastructure, security systems, management, and operational information systems |
| Regulatory standards | The legislation regulating data centers may depend on the complexity of the company, potentially including HIPPA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act), SOX (Sarbanes Oxley) 2002, SAS 70 Type I or II, GLBA (Gramm-Leach Bliley Act) as well as new regulations |
| Operational standards | These standards guide the daily processes and procedures once the data center is constructed: Uptime Institute: Operational Sustainability, International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 9000 — Quality System, ISO 14000 — Environmental Management System, ISO 27001 — Information Security, PCI — Payment Card Industry Security Standard, SOC, SAS70 & ISAE 3402 or SSAE16, FFIEC (USA) — Assurance Controls, AMS-IX — Amsterdam Internet Exchange — Data Center Business Continuity Standard, EN50600-2–6 Management and Operational Information |
| Power purchase agreement (PPA) | An important contract that governs the sale and purchase of power, thereby reaping the benefits of renewable energy |
Fig. 2A typical circular economy approach example
Circular economy tools
| Tools | Description |
|---|---|
| Materials passports | Materials passports is a value monitoring tool that can be used to bring back residual value to the market. Materials passports allow information about materials, substances, or processes available at any time, from manufacturing to ordering, use, and maintenance. The properties of the material are required; this information involves physical or chemical properties, material safety data sheets, bill of materials (BOM), logistics, disassembly, and recyclability. The process required to create one includes multiple stakeholders and organizations |
| Life cycle costing (LCC) | Derived from ISO 15686. LCC is an economic methodology that calculates the total cost of a commodity, resource, operation, or service over its life cycle. LCC is used for decision-making in a variety of ways and for a variety of reasons. It is classified into three types: conventional, environmental, and social |
| Life cycle assessment (LCA) | Derived from ISO 14040. LCA evaluates the net environmental impact of the production process, use, pollution, and activities associated with the construction and management of a building, service, or object. Economic or cultural issues, on the other hand, are ignored |
| Social life cycle assessment (S-LCA) | S-LCA adheres to the ISO 14040 framework; nevertheless, some features change, are more prevalent, or are intensified at each stage of the research. S-LCA does not provide information on whether or not a product should be created, but can provide information that is useful in making a choice. The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) is in charge of coordinating environmental responses across the United Nations system. They have also suggested recommendations and procedures for creating life cycle inventories |
| Material circularity indicator (MCI) | MCI is a decision-making process designed to evaluate how well an organization or product does as it transitions from a linear to a circular economy. The MCI value of the component or components is between 0 and 1 (or 0% − 100% of the recirculated parts), with a value greater than 1 indicating greater circularity |
Software and prototype options available for the purpose of LCC, LCIA, and circularity
| Software and prototype | Brief description | Source |
|---|---|---|
| TOMRA Expert Line | TOMRA Expert Line in Canada has developed algorithms for material recycling and waste solutions | |
| OPTORO | Have also developed algorithms for material recycling and waste solutions | |
| CEP-AMERICAS | This Circular Economy Platform (CEP) of the Americas is an initiative powered by the Americas Sustainable Development Foundation (ASDF). It fills the vacuum for an easy-access one-stop-shop portal where information about circular economy from and for the Americas is made available | |
| Eco invent | Database for the life cycle assessment on energy supply, resource extraction, material supply, chemicals, metals, agriculture, waste management services, and transport services. The Eco invent life cycle inventory database, aids in environmental analyses of goods and processes globally | |
| SimaPro | SimaPro enables you to successfully apply your sustainability expertise to enable informed decision-making and improve product life cycles The program enables you to acquire insights about the environmental performance of products and services, allowing you to become an informed change-maker who actually promotes long-term change. The program may be used for a variety of purposes, including sustainability reporting, carbon and water foot printing, product design, environmental product declaration generation, and identifying key performance indicators | |
| Thinkstep GaBi | Life cycle assessments, product and organizational carbon footprints. This database spans over multiple sectors | |
| Schneider Electric | Calculators based on data science. Tools are web-based that allow you to experiment with “what-if” scenarios using data and science to estimate outcomes during data center concept and design work | |
| Circularise | An open, distributed and secure communications protocol for the circular economy. The platform allows information exchange between stakeholders throughout the value chain, creating transparency around product histories and material destinations | |
| Circular economy toolkit (CET) | An assessment tool, which identifies improvements in products’ circularity | |
| Material circularity indicator (MCI) | Described by the Ellen MacArthur foundation as a tool used to assess European products in regard to a circular economy | |
| Circularity calculator | Supports manufacturers in product designs for a circular economy | |
| C-BUILD | Rates circularity developed by National University of Singapore (NUS). Supports zero-waste policy goals. The method is designed for rating future-proof construction of buildings. It operates on the requirements of architecture and listed metrics (design considerations), originating from CE definitions | |
| Embodied carbon in construction calculator (EC3) | A free and easy to use tool that allows benchmarking, assessment, and reductions in embodied carbon, focused on the upfront supply chain emissions of materials | |
| Documentation and record keeping for data centers | Software management tools such as DCIM (Data Centre Infrastructure Management), CMMS (Computerized Maintenance Management System), EPMS (Electrical Power Monitoring System), and DMS (Document Management System) for operations and maintenance can provide a “single pane of glass” to view all required procedures, infrastructure assets, maintenance activities, and operational issues |
Barriers towards a circular data center
| Barriers | Description of barriers |
|---|---|
| The lack of valuable data | The accuracy and quality of the data is a crucial concern. This is because of the lack of sufficient, applicable, and reliable historical data |
| Government policies and interventions | There are not efficient development strategies and enforcements in place towards circular thinking |
| Global economic instability | Unprecedented economic instability, increasing inflation with weak economic patterns, reduced buying power and restricted budgets |
| Others | •Stakeholders are not willing to pay the extra costs •Education is limited or slow |
Current applications and initiatives
| Application/initiative | Description |
|---|---|
| ITRENEW [ | ITRENEW is based in Silicon Valley and has been optimizing the lifetime benefit of data center technologies for more than two decades through creative circular economic models and a robust range of resources for decommissioning and network protection, computing and storage solutions on a rack scale. They have collaborated with some of the largest hyper scale data centers in the world. They have also built a new circular data center model to open up ways to increase the efficiency of the infrastructure and boost sustainability. By seeing the true promise of the data center equipment lifecycle, from network architecture to the remanufacture of complete systems after decommissioning |
| Amazon [ | Amazon’s commitment to fighting climate change, with the goal of reducing carbon emissions to be carbon–neutral by 2040. The companies’ plan is to be run solely on renewables by 2030. Amazon currently gets 40% of its energy from renewables, such as solar and wind farms. “Our research shows that delivering a typical order to an Amazon customer is more environmentally friendly than that customer driving to a store,” an Amazon sustainability representative had written |
| Google data centers [ | The strategic collaboration between Google and the Ellen MacArthur Foundation assists Google in expanding on current strategies and integrating circular economic concepts into the architecture of Google’s technology, operations, and community. Maintenance, renovation/remanufacturing, redistribution/secondary sector selling, and recycling. These activities combined with Google’s circular approach to managing server end-of-life based on the concept of total cost of ownership (TCO) culminated in expense avoidance of hundreds of millions of dollars per annum •Google is the product manufacturer in Google’s server supply chain. Google performs an excess and obsolescence (E&O) project that analyses the life cycle of products and their overall ownership costs compared to new equipment and compares demand and supply to assess E&O rates •Google’s data center maintenance process helps the servers to have a longer life expectancy. When servers malfunction and collapse into maintenance, the faulty parts are replaced with refurbished components •When data center servers are decommissioned, they are transferred to the main repository. At the core servers, their functional components (central processing unit (CPU), motherboard, flash drives, hard disks, ram modules and other parts) are removed and de-kitted. Once all components are in Google’s inventory, both refurbished and new equipment are considered equivalent •Memory modules, hard drives, and original equipment manufacturer (OEM) networking equipment are examples off access equipment; therefore, they are sold in the secondary market •Finally, all equipment that cannot be resold or reused is recycled. This is done by crushing the equipment and is then converted into reusable materials |
| Facebook [ | Facebook’s data centers are among the world’s most modern and energy efficient facilities. Electricity supply has been replaced by clean and renewable sources. Their sustainable hardware design approach is done by looking at the entire life cycle (raw material extraction → manufacturing → transport → use → end of use → reuse or recycling) with the goal of reducing fossil fuel inputs and emissions. Natural fiber-filled polypropylene (NFFPP) is being used as replacement for many of their materials, thereby reducing the carbon footprint |
| Microsoft [ | Microsoft’s Carbon Negative Pledge — not only to become carbon free by 2030 but also to offset its past carbon emissions by 2050. One solution is to use 100% renewables by 2025, as well as to work with supply chains and partners to reduce carbon emissions |
| European Union (EU) Circular Economy Action Plan [ | Makes Europe less dependent on primary materials. A “Circular Electronics Initiative” to encourage longer life cycles on a variety of equipment for the data center. Acts include server and storage regulatory initiatives under the eco-design mandate to ensure systems are designed for energy consumption and reliability, reparability, upgradability, repair, reuse, and recycling |
| Infrastructure masons (IM) [ | Infrastructure Masons’ Sustainability Committee have come up with several approaches on how data center designers and managers can reduce the industry’s detrimental impact •Using “waste” heat in district heating systems, comfort heating, heating swimming pools, spas, greenhouses, or industrial processes •Power sharing is being integrated into the power grid to provide back-up power to the community when it is not needed by the data center •Turning waste such as biofuel into power •The use of other materials to construct data centers; one example is wood •Managing equipment life cycles; this is done using LCA, LCIA, and LCC |
| Circular Economy for the Data Center Industry (CEDaCI) [ | The data center industry has evolved fast and creates a significant amount of e-waste. The present infrastructure for dealing with this waste is inadequate, and as a result, there is a clear and pressing need to solve this issue right away. CEDaCI will create a Circular Economy for the Data Center Industry by bringing stakeholders from all stages of the equipment life cycle together to transform waste into a usable resource and support the industry’s continuous fast expansion. CEDaCI will create a Circular Economy for the Data Center Industry by increasing the sector’s reclamation and reuse of critical raw materials, extending product life through equipment reuse and remanufacture, reducing the use of virgin materials, waste, and environmental impact caused by the increase in redundant equipment, and developing a secure and economically viable supply chain. At the moment, only 10% from the sector is recycled and recovered, but this will climb to 19% and 24% 5 and 10 years after the project finishes; reuse of equipment will also increase to 65% and 75%, respectively, and overall product “waste” will be reduced to 35% and 25% at end-of-life |
| EcoDataCenter [ | Situated in Falun, North of Stockholm, which is made up of 8 MW 3600 m2 extension framework going up in a beautifully engineered “wood.” It is a product called “Glulam,” an engineered timber created by cross-laminating and gluing, under high pressure. Better fire resistance capability than steel frames due to the surface build-up of carbon limits the oxygen supply to the wood below and acts as an insulator. Glulam also has a much lower embodied energy than reinforced concrete or steel. And importantly a reduction in the carbon footprint |
| InfraPrime | A pure play start-up provides affordable 24 × 7 clean energy infrastructure for global data centers to align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals and enact Climate Action Plan. Arctic Prime data centers are located at the Arctic Circle, deliver net zero in carbon, emission, waste; each data center is resilient using the power duality architecture to utilize hydroelectric renewable energy grid supply, outside air cooling, waste heat reused for district heating to the Nordic communities, applications including green house for agriculture, and fish farming for salmons. EcoPrime Power Clean Energy module is a Carbon Free Energy (CFE) module which generates 24 × 7 carbon free energy on premise at any data center location. Its resilient design provides 99.999% uptime with a performance guaranteed to the data centers, uses renewable gas, fuel cells as the primary energy source using the fossil fuel grid as a backup without the need of a conventional diesel generator. The design has been selected by the European Union “Fuel Cell for prime power in data centers” ID-FCH-02–9-202 and is in operation at Microsoft Research Lab, Seattle, Washington achieving 99.999% uptime when the electric grid has a downtime failure |
| Santa Clara [ | Silicon Valley is one of the largest data center markets in the US. Santa Clara has been the data center capital of Silicon Valley. The main reason for this location is due to the lower power pricing. Santa Clara boasts a number of well-known data centers. With this comes sustainable and efficiency requirements for the data centers The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) mandates that city and state officials weigh a project’s possible environmental impacts before determining if they approve it. The aim of the CEQA is to expose the possible impacts of a project, recommend strategies for mitigating such impacts and explore alternatives to the project so that decision-makers have complete knowledge on which to base the project One company, Vantage Data centers, had recently constructed another data center, designed to meet sustainability requirements. They have used new cooling systems which use less water than normal. This is done by using recycled water and modular chillers and dry-cooler technology |
| UNICA data centers | Use of access or wasted heat to heat 2 million households by 2030. As well as the use of LCC in their data center designs |
| Cloud data centers (CDC) [ | Cloud computing has gained popularity in recent times. These facilities are hosted by CDCs. There is research being done for sustainable CDCs and reductions in emissions. Solutions such as renewable energy, reductions in heat waste, and modular data centers are used |
| CERN openlab2 and used by CERN [ | Growing power prices and aging data centers are forcing many companies to rethink their computing infrastructure’s energy efficiency. CERN has been grappling with this problem for many years, due to its huge processing demands and 35-year-old data center, and is taking a holistic path to achieving the best possible output per watt. CERN has replaced older servers with single-core processors with newer servers built on the newest 45 nm Intel Xeon processors, which have four cores per chip. This approach, according to the company, has added almost 2 years to the life of its data center, and potential multi-core Intel processors could extend it by another 6 months. CERN’s tendering process, data center architecture, power and cooling methods, and software development techniques have also been changed. Both of these modifications are aimed at improving overall efficiency while using less total resources |
Fig. 3The 17 sustainable development goals, elaborated from (https://sdgs.un.org/goals)
Fig. 4The circular economy approach embraces end to end sustainability throughout the lifecycle for a data center and facilitates these changes for those who design, build, operate, and maintain them [38]
Fig. 5Future concept of a data center