Marius Wunderle1, Paul Gass1, Lothar Häberle1,2, Vivien M Flesch1, Claudia Rauh1, Mayada R Bani1, Carolin C Hack1, Michael G Schrauder1, Sebastian M Jud1, Julius Emons1, Ramona Erber3, Arif B Ekici4, Juliane Hoyer4, Georgia Vasileiou4, Cornelia Kraus4, Andre Reis4, Arndt Hartmann3, Michael P Lux1, Matthias W Beckmann1, Peter A Fasching5,6, Alexander Hein1. 1. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany. 2. Biostatistics Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany. 3. Institute of Pathology, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany. 4. Institute of Human Genetics, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany. 5. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany. peter.fasching@uk-erlangen.de. 6. Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California at Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA. peter.fasching@uk-erlangen.de.
Abstract
PURPOSE: BRCA1/2 mutations influence the molecular characteristics and the effects of systemic treatment of breast cancer. This study investigates the impact of germline BRCA1/2 mutations on pathological complete response and prognosis in patients receiving neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy. METHODS: Breast cancer patients were tested for a BRCA1/2 mutation in clinical routine work and were treated with anthracycline-based or platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy between 1997 and 2015. These patients were identified in the tumor registry of the Breast Center of the University of Erlangen (Germany). Logistic regression and Cox regression analyses were performed to investigate the associations between BRCA1/2 mutation status, pathological complete response, disease-free survival, and overall survival. RESULTS: Among 355 patients, 59 had a mutation in BRCA1 or in BRCA2 (16.6%), 43 in BRCA1 (12.1%), and 16 in BRCA2 (4.5%). Pathological complete response defined as "ypT0; ypN0" was observed in 54.3% of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, but only in 22.6% of non-carriers. The adjusted odds ratio was 2.48 (95% CI 1.26-4.91) for BRCA1/2 carriers versus non-carriers. Patients who achieved a pathological complete response had better disease-free survival and overall survival rates compared with those who did not achieve a pathological complete response, regardless of BRCA1/2 mutation status. CONCLUSIONS: BRCA1/2 mutation status leads to better responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Pathological complete response is the main predictor of disease-free survival and overall survival, independently of BRCA1/2 mutation status.
PURPOSE:BRCA1/2 mutations influence the molecular characteristics and the effects of systemic treatment of breast cancer. This study investigates the impact of germline BRCA1/2 mutations on pathological complete response and prognosis in patients receiving neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy. METHODS:Breast cancerpatients were tested for a BRCA1/2 mutation in clinical routine work and were treated with anthracycline-based or platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy between 1997 and 2015. These patients were identified in the tumor registry of the Breast Center of the University of Erlangen (Germany). Logistic regression and Cox regression analyses were performed to investigate the associations between BRCA1/2 mutation status, pathological complete response, disease-free survival, and overall survival. RESULTS: Among 355 patients, 59 had a mutation in BRCA1 or in BRCA2 (16.6%), 43 in BRCA1 (12.1%), and 16 in BRCA2 (4.5%). Pathological complete response defined as "ypT0; ypN0" was observed in 54.3% of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, but only in 22.6% of non-carriers. The adjusted odds ratio was 2.48 (95% CI 1.26-4.91) for BRCA1/2 carriers versus non-carriers. Patients who achieved a pathological complete response had better disease-free survival and overall survival rates compared with those who did not achieve a pathological complete response, regardless of BRCA1/2 mutation status. CONCLUSIONS:BRCA1/2 mutation status leads to better responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Pathological complete response is the main predictor of disease-free survival and overall survival, independently of BRCA1/2 mutation status.
Authors: Achim Wöckel; Michael P Lux; Wolfgang Janni; Andreas D Hartkopf; Naiba Nabieva; Florin-Andrei Taran; Friedrich Overkamp; Peyman Hadji; Hans Tesch; Johannes Ettl; Diana Lüftner; Volkmar Müller; Manfred Welslau; Erik Belleville; Sara Y Brucker; Florian Schütz; Peter A Fasching; Tanja N Fehm; Andreas Schneeweiss; Hans-Christian Kolberg Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2018-11-26 Impact factor: 2.915
Authors: Volkmar Müller; Achim Wöckel; Michael P Lux; Wolfgang Janni; Andreas D Hartkopf; Naiba Nabieva; Florin-Andrei Taran; Peyman Hadji; Hans Tesch; Johannes Ettl; Diana Lüftner; Manfred Welslau; Erik Belleville; Sara Y Brucker; Florian Schütz; Peter A Fasching; Tanja N Fehm; Hans-Christian Kolberg; Andreas Schneeweiss; Friedrich Overkamp Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2018-11-26 Impact factor: 2.915
Authors: Andreas Schneeweiss; Andreas D Hartkopf; Volkmar Müller; Achim Wöckel; Michael P Lux; Wolfgang Janni; Johannes Ettl; Erik Belleville; Jens Huober; Marc Thill; Peter A Fasching; Hans-Christian Kolberg; Patrik Pöschke; Manfred Welslau; Friedrich Overkamp; Hans Tesch; Tanja N Fehm; Diana Lüftner; Florian Schütz Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2020-03-04 Impact factor: 2.915
Authors: Andreas D Hartkopf; Volkmar Müller; Achim Wöckel; Michael P Lux; Wolfgang Janni; Johannes Ettl; Erik Belleville; Florian Schütz; Peter A Fasching; Hans-Christian Kolberg; Manfred Welslau; Friedrich Overkamp; Florin-Andrei Taran; Sara Y Brucker; Markus Wallwiener; Hans Tesch; Tanja N Fehm; Andreas Schneeweiss; Diana Lüftner Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2019-12-11 Impact factor: 2.915
Authors: Ewa Przybytkowski; Thomas Davis; Abdelrahman Hosny; Julia Eismann; Ursula A Matulonis; Gerburg M Wulf; Sheida Nabavi Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2020-03-12 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Marius Wunderle; Lothar Häberle; Alexander Hein; Sebastian M Jud; Michael P Lux; Carolin C Hack; Julius Emons; Felix Heindl; Naiba Nabieva; Christian R Loehberg; Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland; Arndt Hartmann; Matthias W Beckmann; Peter A Fasching; Paul Gass Journal: Breast Care (Basel) Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 2.268
Authors: Paul Gass; Michael Untch; Volkmar Müller; Volker Möbus; Christoph Thomssen; Lothar Häberle; Ramona Erber; Alexander Hein; Sebastian Michael Jud; Michael P Lux; Carolin C Hack; Arndt Hartmann; Hans-Christian Kolberg; Johannes Ettl; Diana Lüftner; Christian Jackisch; Matthias W Beckmann; Wolfgang Janni; Andreas Schneeweiss; Peter A Fasching; Naiba Nabieva Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2018-07-25 Impact factor: 2.915
Authors: Gagan Gupta; Caroline Dasom Lee; Mary L Guye; Robert E Van Sciver; Michael P Lee; Alex C Lafever; Anthony Pang; Angela M Tang-Tan; Janet S Winston; Billur Samli; Rick J Jansen; Richard A Hoefer; Amy H Tang Journal: Ann Breast Cancer Ther Date: 2020-05-02