OBJECTIVES: Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) becomes increasingly important. For diagnosis and surgery, computed tomography (CT), and cone beam computed tomography (CB-CT) are used equally, although in most of cases, patient positioning differs between supine positioning (CT) and upright seating positioning (CB-CT). We measured volumetric and anatomical changes in the posterior airway space (PAS) between upright and supine positioning in a three-dimensional set up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Coherent CT and CB-CT scans of 55 patients were included in the study. Using Brainlab ENT 3.0, image data was superimposed, and three-dimensional models were segmented. PAS height, cross-sectional area, vertical and horizontal position of the mandible and hyoid, and volumetric analyses of the three-dimensional models were measured. RESULTS: PAS height and cross-sectional area were significantly higher in CB-CT compared to CT scans (p < 0.001). In the vertical dimension, the mandible and hyoid were localized more caudally in CB-CT in contrast to CT scans (p < 0.04; p < 0.001). Three-dimensional evaluation showed a greater volume of the PAS in CB-CT (p < 0.0001). Pearson correlation coefficient showed a correlation between vertical positioning of the mandible and hyoid compared to the positioning of the patient. CONCLUSIONS: Patient positioning during CT and CB-CT has an effect on the location of anatomical structures like the mandible and hyoid and changes the dimensions and volume of the posterior airway space significantly. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The radiological technique used and the positioning of the patient should be taken into account when considering further surgical therapy.
OBJECTIVES: Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) becomes increasingly important. For diagnosis and surgery, computed tomography (CT), and cone beam computed tomography (CB-CT) are used equally, although in most of cases, patient positioning differs between supine positioning (CT) and upright seating positioning (CB-CT). We measured volumetric and anatomical changes in the posterior airway space (PAS) between upright and supine positioning in a three-dimensional set up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Coherent CT and CB-CT scans of 55 patients were included in the study. Using Brainlab ENT 3.0, image data was superimposed, and three-dimensional models were segmented. PAS height, cross-sectional area, vertical and horizontal position of the mandible and hyoid, and volumetric analyses of the three-dimensional models were measured. RESULTS:PAS height and cross-sectional area were significantly higher in CB-CT compared to CT scans (p < 0.001). In the vertical dimension, the mandible and hyoid were localized more caudally in CB-CT in contrast to CT scans (p < 0.04; p < 0.001). Three-dimensional evaluation showed a greater volume of the PAS in CB-CT (p < 0.0001). Pearson correlation coefficient showed a correlation between vertical positioning of the mandible and hyoid compared to the positioning of the patient. CONCLUSIONS:Patient positioning during CT and CB-CT has an effect on the location of anatomical structures like the mandible and hyoid and changes the dimensions and volume of the posterior airway space significantly. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The radiological technique used and the positioning of the patient should be taken into account when considering further surgical therapy.
Authors: Jerome A Dempsey; James B Skatrud; Anthony J Jacques; Stanley J Ewanowski; B Tucker Woodson; Pamela R Hanson; Brian Goodman Journal: Chest Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 9.410