Literature DB >> 27428909

Improved Virtual Planning for Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery.

Muhanad Hatamleh1, Catherine Turner, Gurprit Bhamrah, Gavin Mack, Jonas Osher.   

Abstract

Conventional model surgery planning for bimaxillary orthognathic surgery can be laborious, time-consuming and may contain potential errors; hence three-dimensional (3D) virtual orthognathic planning has been proven to be an efficient, reliable, and cost-effective alternative. In this report, the 3D planning is described for a patient presenting with a Class III incisor relationship on a Skeletal III base with pan facial asymmetry complicated by reverse overjet and anterior open bite. A combined scan data of direct cone beam computer tomography and indirect dental scan were used in the planning. Additionally, a new method of establishing optimum intercuspation by scanning dental casts in final occlusion and positioning it to the composite-scans model was shown. Furthermore, conventional model surgery planning was carried out following in-house protocol. Intermediate and final intermaxillary splints were produced following the conventional method and 3D printing. Three-dimensional planning showed great accuracy and treatment outcome and reduced laboratory time in comparison with the conventional method. Establishing the final dental occlusion on casts and integrating it in final 3D planning enabled us to achieve the best possible intercuspation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27428909     DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002877

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  5 in total

1.  Customized virtual surgical planning in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Daniel Schneider; Peer W Kämmerer; Matthias Hennig; Gerhard Schön; Daniel G E Thiem; Reinhard Bschorer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Laboratorial Comparative Study of the Accuracy Between Virtual Planning and Erickson's Platform.

Authors:  Maysa Nogueira de Barros Melo; Ítalo Miranda do Vale Pereira; Alexander Tadeu Sverzut; Cássio Edvard Sverzut; Alexandre Elias Trivellato
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2022-01-17

3.  Three-dimensional evaluation of the posterior airway space: differences in computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Nassim Ayoub; Philipp Eble; Kristian Kniha; Florian Peters; Stephan Christian Möhlhenrich; Evgeny Goloborodko; Frank Hölzle; Ali Modabber
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Clinical Accuracy of 3D-Planned Maxillary Positioning Using CAD/CAM-Generated Splints in Combination With Temporary Mandibular Fixation in Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery.

Authors:  S Pietzka; F Mascha; K Winter; P W Kämmerer; A Sakkas; A Schramm; F Wilde
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2020-08-17

5.  Accuracy of triangular meshes of stone models created from DICOM cone beam CT data.

Authors:  Dimitrios Apostolakis; Georgios Michelinakis; Georgios Kourakis; Emmanuel Pavlakis
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2019-05-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.