Literature DB >> 12226022

Anatomic determinants of sleep-disordered breathing across the spectrum of clinical and nonclinical male subjects.

Jerome A Dempsey1, James B Skatrud, Anthony J Jacques, Stanley J Ewanowski, B Tucker Woodson, Pamela R Hanson, Brian Goodman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We wished to determine the independent contribution of craniofacial dimensions of the upper airway to sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) in subjects who spanned the entire continuum of SDB. We also determined the interactive effects of body mass index (BMI) and age on the relationship between airway dimensions and SDB. DESIGN AND
SUBJECTS: We studied 142 nonclinical male subjects in a working community population (average age, 47 years; average BMI, 29; average +/- SD apnea/hypopnea index [AHI], 20 +/- 20/h), and 62 patients with obstructive sleep apnea (average age, 47 years; average BMI, 32; average +/- SD AHI, 48 +/- 35/h. We determined the AHI from overnight polysomnography and the number of oxygen desaturations (> or = 2%) per hour of sleep. We used lateral facial cephalometric radiographs to measure 41 anatomic landmarks and 55 dimensions in the upper airway.
SETTING: A university hospital and a sleep-disorders clinic. DATA ANALYSIS: We used stepwise regression analysis to determine the independent contributions of measured variables to SDB. MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: In the entire study population (n = 204), variations in BMI and six measures of craniofacial morphology accounted equally for one half of the total variance in AHI, and their interactive effects accounted for an additional 15%. Membership in the clinical or nonclinical group per se had no significant influence on these relationships. The single most important cephalometric variable in predicting AHI severity was the horizontal dimension of the maxilla (ie, porion vertical to supradentale [PV-A] distance). When the PV-A distance was relatively narrow (< 97 mm) the probability of having mild (AHI, 15 to 30/h) to severe (AHI > 30/h) SDB increased fivefold to sevenfold in nonobese subjects and threefold in obese subjects. Thus, in nonobese subjects (average BMI, 25 +/- 2) and in subjects with narrow upper airway dimensions, four cephalometric dimensions were the dominant predictors of AHI, accounting for 50% of the variance. However, in subjects with a large anteroposterior facial dimension, BMI was the major predictor of AHI and a BMI > 28 increased the probability of moderate-to-severe sleep apnea by approximately fivefold. Finally, the combination of cephalometric dimensions and BMI accounted for an increasing amount of the variance in AHI as the severity of AHI increased.
CONCLUSIONS: Across the population spectrum of SDB, four cephalometric dimensions of the upper airway in combination with BMI accounted independently for up to two thirds of the variation in AHI; and the relative contribution of these two sets of determinants of AHI varied depending on airway size, obesity, and the amount of SDB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12226022     DOI: 10.1378/chest.122.3.840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  42 in total

Review 1.  The ventilatory responsiveness to CO(2) below eupnoea as a determinant of ventilatory stability in sleep.

Authors:  Jerome A Dempsey; Curtis A Smith; Tadeuez Przybylowski; Bruno Chenuel; Ailiang Xie; Hideaki Nakayama; James B Skatrud
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Anthropometric Measures and Prediction of Maternal Sleep-Disordered Breathing.

Authors:  Ghada Bourjeily; Alison Chambers; Myriam Salameh; Margaret H Bublitz; Amanpreet Kaur; Alexandra Coppa; Patricia Risica; Geralyn Lambert-Messerlian
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 4.062

Review 3.  [Update on upper airway evaluation in obstructive sleep apnea].

Authors:  J T Maurer; B A Stuck
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 4.  Opportunities for utilizing polysomnography signals to characterize obstructive sleep apnea subtypes and severity.

Authors:  Diego R Mazzotti; Diane C Lim; Kate Sutherland; Lia Bittencourt; Jesse W Mindel; Ulysses Magalang; Allan I Pack; Philip de Chazal; Thomas Penzel
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 2.833

5.  Three-dimensional evaluation of the posterior airway space: differences in computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Nassim Ayoub; Philipp Eble; Kristian Kniha; Florian Peters; Stephan Christian Möhlhenrich; Evgeny Goloborodko; Frank Hölzle; Ali Modabber
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Surface cephalometric and anthropometric variables in OSA patients: statistical models for the OSA phenotype.

Authors:  Rita A Perri; Kristina Kairaitis; Peter Cistulli; John R Wheatley; Terence C Amis
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2013-04-13       Impact factor: 2.816

7.  The influence of race on the severity of sleep disordered breathing.

Authors:  Sukanya Pranathiageswaran; M Safwan Badr; Richard Severson; James A Rowley
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 4.062

Review 8.  Pathophysiology of sleep apnea.

Authors:  Jerome A Dempsey; Sigrid C Veasey; Barbara J Morgan; Christopher P O'Donnell
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 37.312

9.  Prediction of obstructive sleep apnea with craniofacial photographic analysis.

Authors:  Richard W W Lee; Peter Petocz; Tania Prvan; Andrew S L Chan; Ronald R Grunstein; Peter A Cistulli
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.849

10.  Craniofacial phenotyping in obstructive sleep apnea--a novel quantitative photographic approach.

Authors:  Richard W W Lee; Andrew S L Chan; Ronald R Grunstein; Peter A Cistulli
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.