| Literature DB >> 29725202 |
Xiaoqin Diao1, Haining Guan1, Baohua Kong2,1, Xinxin Zhao2,1.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to prepare diacylglycerol (DAG) by enzymatic glycerolysis of lard. The effects of reaction parameters such as lipase type, reaction temperature, enzyme amount, substrate molar ratio (lard/glycerol), reaction time, and magnetic stirring speed were investigated. Lipozyme RMIM was found to be a more active biocatalyst than Novozym 435, and the optimal reaction conditions were 14:100 (W/W) of enzyme to lard substrate ratio, 1:1 of lard to glycerol molar ratio, and 500 rpm magnetic stirring speed. The reaction mixture was first incubated at 65℃ for 2 h and then transferred to 45℃ for 8 h. At the optimum reaction conditions, the conversion rate of triacylglycerol (TAG) and the content of DAG in the reaction mixture reached 76.26% and 61.76%, respectively, and the DAG content in purified glycerolized lard was 82.03% by molecular distillation. The distribution of fatty acids and Fourier transform infrared spectra in glycerolized lard samples were similar to those in lard samples. The results revealed that enzymatic glycerolysis and molecular distillation can be used to prepare more highly purified DAG from lard.Entities:
Keywords: compositional characteristics; diacylglycerol; glycerolysis; lard
Year: 2017 PMID: 29725202 PMCID: PMC5932939 DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2017.37.6.813
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour ISSN: 1225-8563 Impact factor: 2.622
Fig. 1.Chromatograms from the normal-phase high performance liquid chromatography separation of standard (I), lard (II), lard of Novozyme 435 glycerolysis (III) and lard of Lipozyme RMIM glycerolysis (IV).
Fig. 2.Effect of the reaction temperature on glycerolysis of lard.
Fig. 3.Effect of enzyme to lard substrate ratio (W/W) on glycerolysis of lard.
Fig. 4.Effect of the molar ratio of lard to glycerol on glycerolysis of lard.
Fig. 5.Effect of reaction time on glycerolysis of lard.
Fig. 6.Effect of magnetic stirring speed on the glycerolysis of lard.
Fig. 7.Thin-layer chromatography analysis of lard, glycerolized lard and purified glycerolized lard.
Acylglycerol profile of lard, glycerolized lard and purified glycerolized lard (wt %)
| Acylglycerol profile | Lard | Glycerolized lard | Purified glycerolized lard |
|---|---|---|---|
| MAG | 0.0c | 14.50 ± 1.03a | 8.85 ± 0.69b |
| 1, 2-DAG | 0.0c | 21.73 ± 0.25b | 31.14 ± 0.32a |
| 1, 3-DAG | 0.0c | 40.03 ± 0.20b | 50.89 ± 0.19a |
| TAG | 100 ± 0.00a | 23.74 ± 0.02b | 9.12 ± 0.07c |
Means in the same row with different letters differ significantly (p<0.05). TAG, triacylglycerols; DAG, diacylglycerol; MAG, monoacylglycerol.
The primary fatty acids and iodine values of lard, glycerolized lard and purified glycerolized lard
| Lard Glycerolized lard | Purified glycerolized lard | Relative amount (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fatty acid | C14:0 | 1.10 ± 0.03a | 1.17 ± 0.06a | 1.20 ± 0.06a |
| C16:1 | 1.79 ± 0.04a | 1.85 ± 0.07a | 1.92 ± 0.03a | |
| C16:0 | 23.97 ± 0.02a | 24.16 ± 0.02a | 24.60 ± 0.03a | |
| C18:2 | 8.03 ± 0.04a | 7.81 ± 0.09a | 7.75 ± 0.06a | |
| C18:1 | 48.09 ± 0.05a | 47.90 ± 0.09a | 47.64 ± 0.06a | |
| C18:0 | 12.95 ± 0.08a | 12.98 ± 0.03a | 13.05± 0.05a | |
| SFA | 38.02 | 38.31 | 38.85 | |
| USFA | 57.91 | 57.56 | 57.31 | |
| Iodine value | 55.50 ± 0.56a | 54.35 ± 034b | 53.45 ± 0.23b | |
Means in the same row with different letters differ significantly (p<0.05). SFA, saturated fatty acid; USFA, unsaturated fatty acid.
Fig. 8.FTIR spectra of lard, glycerolysis lard and purified glycerolized lard at frequency 4000-650 cm-1.