Manuel Tomás Borges Radaelli1, Henrique Takashi Idogava2, Aloisio Oro Spazzin3, Pedro Yoshito Noritomi4, Noéli Boscato5. 1. Postgraduate student, Graduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil; and Professor, School of Dentistry, Meridional Faculty (IMED), Passo Fundo, Brazil. 2. Postgraduate student, School of Mechanical Engineering, Campinas State University, Campinas, Brazil. 3. Professor, School of Dentistry, Meridional Faculty (IMED), Passo Fundo, Brazil. 4. Researcher, Renato Archer Center of Information Technology, Campinas, Brazil. 5. Associate Professor, Graduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil. Electronic address: noeliboscato@gmail.com.
Abstract
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: An occlusal device is frequently recommended for patients with bruxism to protect implant-supported restorations and prevent marginal bone loss. Scientific evidence to support this treatment is lacking. PURPOSE: The purpose of this 3-dimensional (3D) finite element study was to evaluate the influence of an acrylic resin occlusal device, implant length, and insertion depth on stress distribution with functional and parafunctional loadings. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Computer-aided design software was used to construct 8 models. The models were composed of a mandibular bone section including the second premolar and first and second molars. Insertion depths (bone level and 2 mm subcrestal) were simulated at the first molar. Three natural antagonist maxillary teeth and the placement or not of an occlusal device were simulated. Functional (200-N axial and 10-N oblique) and parafunctional (1000-N axial and 25-N oblique) forces were applied. Finite element analysis (FEA) was used to determine the maximum principal stress for the cortical and trabecular bone and von Mises for implant and prosthetic abutment. RESULTS: Stress concentration was observed at the abutment-implant and the implant-bone interfaces. Occlusal device placement changed the pattern of stress distribution and reduced stress levels from parafunctional loading in all structures, except in the trabecular bone. Implants with subcrestal insertion depths had reduced stress at the implant-abutment interface and cortical bone around the implant abutment, while the stress increased in the bone in contact with the implant. CONCLUSIONS: Parafunctional loading increased the stress levels in all structures when compared with functional loading. An occlusal device resulted in the lowest stress levels at the abutment and implant and the most favorable stress distribution between the cortical and trabecular bone. Under parafunctional loading, an occlusal device was more effective in reducing stress distribution for longer implants inserted at bone level. Subcrestally, implant insertion yielded the most favorable biomechanical conditions at the abutment-implant interface and at the coronal surface of the cortical bone, mainly when there was no occlusal device.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: An occlusal device is frequently recommended for patients with bruxism to protect implant-supported restorations and prevent marginal bone loss. Scientific evidence to support this treatment is lacking. PURPOSE: The purpose of this 3-dimensional (3D) finite element study was to evaluate the influence of an acrylic resin occlusal device, implant length, and insertion depth on stress distribution with functional and parafunctional loadings. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Computer-aided design software was used to construct 8 models. The models were composed of a mandibular bone section including the second premolar and first and second molars. Insertion depths (bone level and 2 mm subcrestal) were simulated at the first molar. Three natural antagonist maxillary teeth and the placement or not of an occlusal device were simulated. Functional (200-N axial and 10-N oblique) and parafunctional (1000-N axial and 25-N oblique) forces were applied. Finite element analysis (FEA) was used to determine the maximum principal stress for the cortical and trabecular bone and von Mises for implant and prosthetic abutment. RESULTS: Stress concentration was observed at the abutment-implant and the implant-bone interfaces. Occlusal device placement changed the pattern of stress distribution and reduced stress levels from parafunctional loading in all structures, except in the trabecular bone. Implants with subcrestal insertion depths had reduced stress at the implant-abutment interface and cortical bone around the implant abutment, while the stress increased in the bone in contact with the implant. CONCLUSIONS: Parafunctional loading increased the stress levels in all structures when compared with functional loading. An occlusal device resulted in the lowest stress levels at the abutment and implant and the most favorable stress distribution between the cortical and trabecular bone. Under parafunctional loading, an occlusal device was more effective in reducing stress distribution for longer implants inserted at bone level. Subcrestally, implant insertion yielded the most favorable biomechanical conditions at the abutment-implant interface and at the coronal surface of the cortical bone, mainly when there was no occlusal device.