Literature DB >> 33728596

Impact of peri-implant bone resorption, prosthetic materials, and crown to implant ratio on the stress distribution of short implants: a finite element analysis.

Pinar Ercal1, Aysegul Erten Taysi2, Demet Cagil Ayvalioglu3, Meltem Mert Eren4, Soner Sismanoglu4.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of prosthetic materials and crown/implant (C/I) ratio on short implants with a marginal bone resorption. Three-dimensional finite element analysis was used to simulate stress distribution under static loading in non-resorption and resorption scenarios (3-mm vertical bone loss) in implants restored with single crowns and C/I ratios of 1:1, 1.5:1, and 2:1 were evaluated. Different crown materials were used: porcelain-fused to metal, porcelain-fused to zirconia, monolithic zirconia, and zirconia-based crown veneered with indirect composite resin. The C/I ratio, the peri-implant bone resorption, and the loading conditions were the key factors affecting the generated stress in short implants. In non-resorption models, von Mises stress ranged between 50 and 105 MPa whereas in resorption models, the values ranged from 168 to 322 MPa, both increasing with the higher C/I ratio under oblique forces. Under axial loading, the C/I ratio did not influence the stress values as the presence of resorption was the only parameter increasing, 57 MPa for the non-resorption models and 101 MPa for the resorption models, respectively. Preference of a prosthetic material was ineffective on the distribution of stress in the bone and implant structure under static loading in any models. The peri-implant bone resorption and a higher C/I ratio in short implants increase the stress values under both axial and oblique forces, whereas the crown material does not influence stress distribution in the surrounding bone and implant structure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone resorption; Crown restoration; Dental implants; Finite element analysis; Implant prosthesis

Year:  2021        PMID: 33728596     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-021-02342-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  55 in total

Review 1.  A targeted review of study outcomes with short (< or = 7 mm) endosseous dental implants placed in partially edentulous patients.

Authors:  D Hagi; D A Deporter; R M Pilliar; T Arenovich
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 6.993

2.  Success rate of short dental implants supporting single crowns and fixed bridges.

Authors:  Hans Malmstrom; Bhumija Gupta; Alexis Ghanem; Rita Cacciato; Yanfang Ren; Georgios E Romanos
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 3.  A systematic review on marginal bone loss around short dental implants (<10 mm) for implant-supported fixed prostheses.

Authors:  Alberto Monje; Fernando Suarez; Pablo Galindo-Moreno; Agustín García-Nogales; Jia-Hui Fu; Hom-Lay Wang
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 5.977

4.  Short dental implants (6 mm) versus long dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures: 3-year results from a multicentre, randomized, controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Veronika Pohl; Daniel S Thoma; Katarzyna Sporniak-Tutak; Abel Garcia-Garcia; Thomas D Taylor; Robert Haas; Christoph H F Hämmerle
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 8.728

Review 5.  Are short dental implants (<10 mm) effective? a meta-analysis on prospective clinical trials.

Authors:  Alberto Monje; Hsun-Liang Chan; Jia-Hui Fu; Fernando Suarez; Pablo Galindo-Moreno; Hom-Lay Wang
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 6.993

6.  Short implants had lower survival rates in posterior jaws compared to standard implants.

Authors:  Gary L Stafford
Journal:  Evid Based Dent       Date:  2016-12

Review 7.  Short Implants (5 to 8 mm) Versus Longer Implants (>8 mm) with Sinus Lifting in Atrophic Posterior Maxilla: A Meta-Analysis of RCTs.

Authors:  Tengfei Fan; Yicun Li; Wei-Wei Deng; Tianfu Wu; Wenfeng Zhang
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 3.932

8.  Primary Stability of Short Implants Inserted Using Piezoelectric or Drilling Systems: An In Vitro Comparison.

Authors:  Claudio Stacchi; Matteo De Biasi; Lucio Torelli; Massimo Robiony; Roberto Di Lenarda; Daniele Angerame
Journal:  J Oral Implantol       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 9.  Reasons for marginal bone loss around oral implants.

Authors:  Jie Qian; Ann Wennerberg; Tomas Albrektsson
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.932

10.  Short implants: A systematic review.

Authors:  I Karthikeyan; Shrikar R Desai; Rika Singh
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2012-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.