Literature DB >> 29723842

A Robust Method for Ultrasound Beamforming in the Presence of Off-Axis Clutter and Sound Speed Variation.

Kazuyuki Dei1, Brett Byram2.   

Abstract

Previously, we introduced a model-based beamforming algorithm to suppress ultrasound imaging artifacts caused by clutter sources, such as reverberation and off-axis scattering. We refer to this method as aperture domain model image reconstruction (ADMIRE). In this study, we evaluated the algorithm's limitations and ability to suppress off-axis energy using Field II-based simulations, experimental phantoms and in vivo data acquired by a Verasonics ultrasound system with a curvilinear transducer (C5-2). We compared image quality derived from a standard delay-and-sum (DAS) beamformer, DAS with coherence factor (CF) weighting, ADMIRE and ADMIRE plus CF weighting. Simulations, phantoms and in vivo scan results demonstrate that ADMIRE substantially suppresses off-axis energy, while preserving the spatial resolution of standard DAS beamforming. We also observed that ADMIRE with CF weighting further improves some aspects of image quality. We identified limitations of ADMIRE when suppressing off-axis clutter in the presence of strong scattering, and we suggest a solution. Finally, because ADMIRE is a model-based beamformer, we used simulated phantoms to test the performance of ADMIRE under model-mismatch caused by gross sound speed deviation. The impact of sound speed errors largely mimics DAS beamforming, but ADMIRE never does worse than DAS itself in resolution or contrast. As expected the CF weighting used as a post processing technique provides a boost in contrast but decreases CNR and speckle SNR. The results indicate that ADMIRE is robust in terms of model-mismatch caused by sound speed variation, especially when the actual sound speed is slower than the assumed sound speed. As an example, the image contrast obtained using DAS, DAS + CF, ADMIRE and ADMIRE + CF in the presence of -5% gross sound speed error are 24.9 ± 0.71 dB, 39.1 ± 1.2 dB, 43.2 ± 2.3 dB and 52.5 ± 2.9 dB, respectively.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clutter suppression; Gross sound speed variation; Image quality; Model; Off-axis scattering; Ultrasound beamforming

Year:  2018        PMID: 29723842      PMCID: PMC6014921          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2018.04.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasonics        ISSN: 0041-624X            Impact factor:   2.890


  22 in total

1.  Adaptive imaging using the generalized coherence factor.

Authors:  Pai-Chi Li; Meng-Lin Li
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  Optimal apodization design for medical ultrasound using constrained least squares part II: simulation results.

Authors:  Drake A Guenther; William F Walker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Optimal apodization design for medical ultrasound using constrained least squares part I: theory.

Authors:  Drake A Guenther; William F Walker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Phase-aberration correction using signals from point reflectors and diffuse scatterers: basic principles.

Authors:  S W Flax; M O'Donnell
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Adaptive beamforming applied to medical ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Johan-Fredrik Synnevåg; Andreas Austeng; Sverre Holm
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  Synergistic enhancements of ultrasound image contrast with a combination of phase aberration correction and dual apodization with cross-correlation.

Authors:  Junseob Shin; Jesse T Yen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  Phase coherence imaging.

Authors:  Jorge Camacho; Montserrat Parrilla; Carlos Fritsch
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.725

8.  Evaluating the robustness of dual apodization with cross-correlation.

Authors:  Chi Hyung Seo; Jesse T Yen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.725

9.  A model and regularization scheme for ultrasonic beamforming clutter reduction.

Authors:  Brett Byram; Kazuyuki Dei; Jaime Tierney; Douglas Dumont
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.725

10.  Dual-/tri-apodization techniques for high frequency ultrasound imaging: a simulation study.

Authors:  Jin Ho Sung; Jong Seob Jeong
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-10-11       Impact factor: 2.819

View more
  8 in total

1.  Computationally Efficient Implementation of Aperture Domain Model Image Reconstruction.

Authors:  Kazuyuki Dei; Siegfried Schlunk; Brett Byram
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  Iterative Model-Based Beamforming for High Dynamic Range Applications.

Authors:  Siegfried Schlunk; Kazuyuki Dei; Brett Byram
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Training Deep Network Ultrasound Beamformers With Unlabeled In Vivo Data.

Authors:  Jaime Tierney; Adam Luchies; Christopher Khan; Jennifer Baker; Daniel Brown; Brett Byram; Matthew Berger
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Electromechanical Wave Imaging With Machine Learning for Automated Isochrone Generation.

Authors:  Lea Melki; Melina Tourni; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 11.037

5.  Evaluating Input Domain and Model Selection for Deep Network Ultrasound Beamforming.

Authors:  Jaime Tierney; Adam Luchies; Matthew Berger; Brett Byram
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Assessing the Robustness of Frequency-Domain Ultrasound Beamforming Using Deep Neural Networks.

Authors:  Adam C Luchies; Brett C Byram
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Feasibility of non-linear beamforming ultrasound methods to characterize and size kidney stones.

Authors:  Ryan S Hsi; Siegfried G Schlunk; Jaime E Tierney; Kazuyuki Dei; Rebecca Jones; Mark George; Pranav Karve; Ravindra Duddu; Brett C Byram
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Main Uncertainties in the RF Ultrasound Scanning Simulation of the Standard Ultrasound Phantoms.

Authors:  Monika Makūnaitė; Rytis Jurkonis; Arūnas Lukoševičius; Mindaugas Baranauskas
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 3.576

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.