Literature DB >> 25751654

Methane baseline concentrations and sources in shallow aquifers from the shale gas-prone region of the St. Lawrence lowlands (Quebec, Canada).

Anja Moritz1, Jean-Francois Hélie2, Daniele L Pinti2, Marie Larocque2, Diogo Barnetche2, Sophie Retailleau2, René Lefebvre3, Yves Gélinas1.   

Abstract

Hydraulic fracturing is becoming an important technique worldwide to recover hydrocarbons from unconventional sources such as shale gas. In Quebec (Canada), the Utica Shale has been identified as having unconventional gas production potential. However, there has been a moratorium on shale gas exploration since 2010. The work reported here was aimed at defining baseline concentrations of methane in shallow aquifers of the St. Lawrence Lowlands and its sources using δ(13)C methane signatures. Since this study was performed prior to large-scale fracturing activities, it provides background data prior to the eventual exploitation of shale gas through hydraulic fracturing. Groundwater was sampled from private (n = 81), municipal (n = 34), and observation (n = 15) wells between August 2012 and May 2013. Methane was detected in 80% of the wells with an average concentration of 3.8 ± 8.8 mg/L, and a range of <0.0006 to 45.9 mg/L. Methane concentrations were linked to groundwater chemistry and distance to the major faults in the studied area. The methane δ(1)(3)C signature of 19 samples was > -50‰, indicating a potential thermogenic source. Localized areas of high methane concentrations from predominantly biogenic sources were found throughout the study area. In several samples, mixing, migration, and oxidation processes likely affected the chemical and isotopic composition of the gases, making it difficult to pinpoint their origin. Energy companies should respect a safe distance from major natural faults in the bedrock when planning the localization of hydraulic fracturation activities to minimize the risk of contaminating the surrounding groundwater since natural faults are likely to be a preferential migration pathway for methane.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25751654     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b00443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  4 in total

1.  Can groundwater sampling techniques used in monitoring wells influence methane concentrations and isotopes?

Authors:  Christine Rivard; Geneviève Bordeleau; Denis Lavoie; René Lefebvre; Xavier Malet
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Monitoring concentration and isotopic composition of methane in groundwater in the Utica Shale hydraulic fracturing region of Ohio.

Authors:  E Claire Botner; Amy Townsend-Small; David B Nash; Xiaomei Xu; Arndt Schimmelmann; Joshua H Miller
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Origin of methane-rich natural gas at the West Pacific convergent plate boundary.

Authors:  Yuji Sano; Naoya Kinoshita; Takanori Kagoshima; Naoto Takahata; Susumu Sakata; Tomohiro Toki; Shinsuke Kawagucci; Amane Waseda; Tefang Lan; Hsinyi Wen; Ai-Ti Chen; Hsiaofen Lee; Tsanyao F Yang; Guodong Zheng; Yama Tomonaga; Emilie Roulleau; Daniele L Pinti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Assessing Connectivity Between an Overlying Aquifer and a Coal Seam Gas Resource Using Methane Isotopes, Dissolved Organic Carbon and Tritium.

Authors:  Charlotte P Iverach; Dioni I Cendón; Stuart I Hankin; David Lowry; Rebecca E Fisher; James L France; Euan G Nisbet; Andy Baker; Bryce F J Kelly
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.