Literature DB >> 27580823

Estimating Emissions of Toxic Hydrocarbons from Natural Gas Production Sites in the Barnett Shale Region of Northern Texas.

Josette E Marrero1, Amy Townsend-Small2, David R Lyon3, Tracy R Tsai4, Simone Meinardi5, Donald R Blake5.   

Abstract

Oil and natural gas operations have continued to expand and move closer to densely populated areas, contributing to growing public concerns regarding exposure to hazardous air pollutants. During the Barnett Shale Coordinated Campaign in October, 2013, ground-based whole air samples collected downwind of oil and gas sites revealed enhancements in several potentially toxic volatile organic compounds (VOCs) when compared to background values. Molar emissions ratios relative to methane were determined for hexane, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene (BTEX compounds). Using methane leak rates measured from the Picarro mobile flux plane (MFP) system and a Barnett Shale regional methane emissions inventory, the rates of emission of these toxic gases were calculated. Benzene emissions ranged between 51 ± 4 and 60 ± 4 kg h-1. Hexane, the most abundantly emitted pollutant, ranged from 642 ± 45 to 1070 ± 340 kg h-1. While observed hydrocarbon enhancements fall below federal workplace standards, results may indicate a link between emissions from oil and natural gas operations and concerns about exposure to hazardous air pollutants. The larger public health risks associated with the production and distribution of natural gas are of particular importance and warrant further investigation, particularly as the use of natural gas increases in the United States and internationally.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27580823     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b02827

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  6 in total

1.  Environmental and individual PAH exposures near rural natural gas extraction.

Authors:  L Blair Paulik; Kevin A Hobbie; Diana Rohlman; Brian W Smith; Richard P Scott; Laurel Kincl; Erin N Haynes; Kim A Anderson
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 8.071

2.  Monitoring concentration and isotopic composition of methane in groundwater in the Utica Shale hydraulic fracturing region of Ohio.

Authors:  E Claire Botner; Amy Townsend-Small; David B Nash; Xiaomei Xu; Arndt Schimmelmann; Joshua H Miller
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Unconventional natural gas development and pediatric asthma hospitalizations in Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Mary D Willis; Todd A Jusko; Jill S Halterman; Elaine L Hill
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 6.498

4.  Residential Proximity to Oil and Gas Development and Birth Outcomes in California: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 2006-2015 Births.

Authors:  Kathy V Tran; Joan A Casey; Lara J Cushing; Rachel Morello-Frosch
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Intercomparison of atmospheric trace gas dispersion models: Barnett Shale case study.

Authors:  Anna Karion; Thomas Lauvaux; Israel Lopez Coto; Colm Sweeney; Kimberly Mueller; Sharon Gourdji; Wayne Angevine; Zachary Barkley; Aijun Deng; Arlyn Andrews; Ariel Stein; James Whetstone
Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 6.133

6.  Home is Where the Pipeline Ends: Characterization of Volatile Organic Compounds Present in Natural Gas at the Point of the Residential End User.

Authors:  Drew R Michanowicz; Archana Dayalu; Curtis L Nordgaard; Jonathan J Buonocore; Molly W Fairchild; Robert Ackley; Jessica E Schiff; Abbie Liu; Nathan G Phillips; Audrey Schulman; Zeyneb Magavi; John D Spengler
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 11.357

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.