Abnormal expression of sialylated Thomsen-Friedenreich antigen (Neu5Acα2-3Galβ1-3GalNAcα-O-Ser/Thr, sialyl-T) has a strong relationship with various types of human cancers and many other diseases. However, the size and structural complexity, and relatively lower abundance of sialyl-T have posed a significant challenge to its detection. Therefore, details about the role of sialyl-T in a variety of physiological and pathological processes are still poorly understood. Here, a one-step chemoenzymatic labeling strategy to probe sialyl-T is described. This approach enables the sensitive, selective, and rapid detection of sialyl-T, and global profiling and identification of unknown sialyl-T-attached glycoproteins, which are potential therapeutic targets or biomarkers. The use of one-step labeling strategy not only has a higher sensitivity than a typical two-step reporter strategy but also avoids undergoing an additional chemical reaction step to introduce a reporter group after the labeling reaction, making it particularly useful for detecting low-abundance glycan epitopes on living cells.
Abnormal expression of sialylated Thomsen-Friedenreich antigen (Neu5Acα2-3Galβ1-3GalNAcα-O-Ser/Thr, sialyl-T) has a strong relationship with various types of humancancers and many other diseases. However, the size and structural complexity, and relatively lower abundance of sialyl-T have posed a significant challenge to its detection. Therefore, details about the role of sialyl-T in a variety of physiological and pathological processes are still poorly understood. Here, a one-step chemoenzymatic labeling strategy to probe sialyl-T is described. This approach enables the sensitive, selective, and rapid detection of sialyl-T, and global profiling and identification of unknown sialyl-T-attached glycoproteins, which are potential therapeutic targets or biomarkers. The use of one-step labeling strategy not only has a higher sensitivity than a typical two-step reporter strategy but also avoids undergoing an additional chemical reaction step to introduce a reporter group after the labeling reaction, making it particularly useful for detecting low-abundance glycan epitopes on living cells.
It is well established
that truncated mucin-type O-glycans located
on the cell surface, such as Tn antigen, sialyl-Tn antigen, T antigen,
and sialyl-T antigen (Figure ), are a hallmark feature of many humancancers.[1,2] In humans, addition of a sialic acid to Galβ1-3GalNAcα-O-Ser/Thr
by ST3Gal sialyltransferases produces sialyl-T antigen and inhibits
any further elongation of the glycan except for possible addition
of another α(2,6)-linked sialic acid to the GalNAc by α-N-acetylgalactosaminide sialyltransferase (ST6GalNAc) to
form disialyl-T (Figure ).[3] Sialyl-T is expressed at low levels
in some normal cells such as epithelium and leukocytes,[4,5] but is more highly expressed on the cell surface of many humancancers
such as breast, cervix, and bladder cancer, and other diseases such
as GNE myopathy.[6,7] Recent studies indicate sialyl-T
might be produced during tumorigenesis, and its prevalence might be
reduced when tumors become metastatic.[8] It was also reported that sialyl-T could enhance tumor growth[9,10] and modulate the tumor immunological microenvironment through engagement
of the lectin Siglec-9.[11] These discoveries
distinguish sialyl-T as an important disease-associated glycan epitope.
Figure 1
Biosynthesis
and structures of truncated mucin-type O-glycans.
Biosynthesis
and structures of truncated mucin-type O-glycans.Although there is growing evidence that sialyl-T is a good
biomarker
for cancer and many other diseases,[6,7] and its utility
for immunotherapy and clinical diagnosis has also been suggested,[11,12] details about its role in a variety of physiological and pathological
processes are still largely unknown due to the lack of an effective
analytical technique. Unlike other truncated O-glycans, there are
no specific monoclonal antibodies or lectins for the direct detection
of sialyl-T. An indirect method that combines neuraminidase treatment
and the use of a T-antigen-binding lectin is the primary method for
sialyl-T analysis.[13,14] Additionally, gene expression
level or enzymatic assay of ST3Gal1,[15] and
mass spectrometry based methods[16] are also
used to evaluate the expression of sialyl-T. Nevertheless, all these
methods are time-consuming with relatively low accuracy.Here,
we report a simple one-step chemoenzymatic labeling strategy
to probe cell surface sialyl-T (Scheme ). Inspired by the biosynthetic pathway of sialyl-T,
this approach capitalizes on the relaxed donor specificity and strict
acceptor specificity of human sialyltransferase ST6GalNAc-IV, which
selectively and rapidly labels the sialyl-T with sialic acid derivative
functionalized with triazole-linked biotin in vitro for further visualization, quantification, and enrichment analysis
of sialyl-T (Scheme ). This approach expands the technologies available for understanding
the role of sialyl-T in a variety of biological and pathological processes.
In recent
years, the development of bioorthogonal chemistry has provided powerful
tools for the analysis of glycans, proteins, lipids, nucleic acids,
and other metabolites in living systems.[17−23] Typically, bioorthogonal functional groups are metabolically incorporated
into target molecules, allowing covalent conjugation by corresponding
biorthogonal chemical reactions with either fluorescent or affinity
tags for subsequent visualization or enrichment. As a complementary
strategy to remodel glycans with unnatural functionalities, an chemoenzymatic
labeling strategy has offered exciting possibilities to interrogate
structure-defined glycan epitopes.[24−30] This strategy takes advantage of glycosyltransferases to tag target
epitopes with biorthogonal reactive groups. However, we and others[31] have found that many glycosyltransferases that
are active in assembling oligosaccharides in the test tube or even
recognize standard glycoproteins failed to label glycan epitopes on
the cell surfaces. This requires careful investigations on a variety
of glycosyltransferases for their capability to work on complex samples
to develop a practical chemoenzymatic labeling tool.In the
sialyl-T biosynthetic pathway, the ST6GalNAc family is the only enzyme
that can directly modify sialyl-T.[32] Among
the reported six ST6GalNAc isoenzymes, ST6GalNAc-IV exhibits a strict
acceptor specificity toward sialyl-T, while other ST6GalNAc isoenzymes
show broader specificity with other structures such as Tn antigen,
T-antigen, and glycolipids.[33−35] Inspired by this biosynthetic
process, we choose ST6GalNAc-IV as a candidate for further studies.
Recombinant humanST6GalNAc-IV was expressed in baculovirus insect
cells (Figure S1), and enzymatic activity
was tested using Neu5Acα2-3Galβ1-3GalNAcα-O-Bn and
CMP-Neu5Ac. A metal ion effect study indicated that the activity of
ST6GalNAc-IV does not rely on metal ions such as Mg2+ or
Mn2+ (Figure S2), which is different
from the previous assays,[34,35] in which high concentration
of Mn2+ was added. This is crucial for the chemoenzymatic
labeling reaction as a high concentration of Mn2+ is toxic
toward living cells and will lead to a high background labeling signal
(data not shown).
Evaluation of Donor and Acceptor Specificity
of ST6GalNAc-IV
A donor and acceptor specificity study is
an important step to
develop a practical chemoenzymatic labeling tool. Relaxed donor specificity
is the prerequisite for glycosyltransferases to carry biorthogonal
functional groups, while acceptor specificity determines what kinds
of epitopes can be labeled. It has been reported that many sialyltransferases
tolerate modifications, even large moieties like biotin at C-5 or
C-9 position.[36,37] To find a good bio-orthogonal
functional group carrier for ST6GalNAc-IV, we designed and synthesized
10 CMP-Neu5Ac analogues (2–11 in Figure ). Preparative scale
synthesis of 1–9 was from ManNAc
or Neu5Ac analogues using sialic acid aldolase from Escherichia
coli K12 and CMP-sialic acid synthetase from Neisseria
meningitis (Schemes S1 and S2).[38] The products were purified using the method
reported previously.[39,40]10 and 11 was synthesized from 2 and 3 by CuAAC
ligation, respectively (Scheme S3). The
products were confirmed by NMR and MS analysis (see Supporting Information). These analogues contain azide, alkyne,
alkene, ketone, and triazolebiotin at the C-5 or C-9 position, and
can be effectively probed by well-established methods such as copper-catalyzed
azide–alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC),[41] strain promoted alkyne–azide cycloaddition (SPACC),[41] Staudinger–Bertozzi ligation,[17] Pd-catalyzed bioorthogonal elimination reaction,[42] Diels–Alder reaction,[43] dual labeling strategy,[44] or
one-step selective exoenzymatic labeling (SEEL) strategy.[45] It is worth mentioning that one-step SEEL is
a newly developed strategy by the Boons group for probing glycoproteins,
which has a much better sensitivity than traditional methods such
as the use of NHS-activated biotin and DBCO-biotin.[45] Donor specificity study of ST6GalNAc-IV with Neu5Acα2-3Galβ1-3GalNAcα-O-Bn
showed that all these CMP-Neu5Ac derivatives could be well accepted
by ST6GalNAc-IV (Figure ). Interestingly, a slightly higher activity was even observed toward
substrate with a large modified group at the C-5 position (10).
Figure 2
Structures of the CMP-Neu5Ac analogues and donor specificity of
ST6GalNAc-IV. aRA: Relative activity. The activity with
natural substrate CMP-Neu5Ac (1) was set as 100. See Supporting Information for experimental details.
Structures of the CMP-Neu5Ac analogues and donor specificity of
ST6GalNAc-IV. aRA: Relative activity. The activity with
natural substrate CMP-Neu5Ac (1) was set as 100. See Supporting Information for experimental details.To study the acceptor specificity
of ST6GalNAc-IV, a sugar library
including 12 representative structures listed in Table was prepared as described in Supporting Information. Acceptor specificity
study using CMP-Neu5Ac analogues 10 showed that ST6GalNAc-IV
is highly specific toward sialyl-T. Although relative high activities
toward Neu5Gcα2-3Galβ1-3GalNAcα-O-Bn and Kdnα2-3Galβ1-3GalNAcα-O-Bn
were also observed, Kdn and Neu5Gc are rarely present in humans.[46] These studies indicate the potential of ST6GalNAc-IV
for use in the versatile labeling of cell surface sialyl-T antigen.
Table 1
Acceptor Specificity of ST6GalNAc-IV
with Compound 10a
The activity
with entry a was set
as 100. The reaction was carried at 37 °C for 30 min. The activity
was quantified by HPLC analysis.
The activity
with entry a was set
as 100. The reaction was carried at 37 °C for 30 min. The activity
was quantified by HPLC analysis.
Chemoenzymatic Labeling Sialyl-T on Living Cells
To
test whether ST6GalNAc-IV can be used for cell surface labeling, we
chose azido, alkynyl, and biotinylated probes (3, 4, and 10) for further experiments as they have
a higher relative activity and can be easily detected by commercially
available reagents. Azido and alkynyl probes (3 and 4 in this work) are the most popular two probes that are widely
used in typical two-step bio-orthogonal reporter strategy.[21] Since compound 10 contains a biotin
group, it can be used to directly biotinylate the target epitopes
by a simpler one-step reaction.[45] Breast
cancerMCF7 (∼5 × 107) was incubated in suspension
with 200 μM of probe 3, 4, or 10 in the presence of 80 μg of ST6GalNAc-IV at 37 °C
for 1 h, while the same labeling reactions without enzyme were performed
in parallel as controls. After the labeling reaction, CuAAC (1 h,
RT) was performed to introduce biotin group: 3 was biotinylated
with 12, and 4 was biotinylated with 13 (Figure A). It is worth mentioning that 13 is a newly developed
picolyl azide reporter probe for the sensitive detection of the alkyne
group.[47,48] The labeling efficiency of the various labeling
probes (3, 4, and 10) was determined
by SDS–PAGE of cell lysates followed by Western blotting using
streptavidin conjugated with HRP. As shown in Figure B, the successful cell labeling requires
both enzyme ST6GalNAc-IV and labeling probes. We found that the popular
two-step clickable approach as the use of reporter pairs of 3 & 12 and 4 & 13 does not work well for detecting sialyl-T (Figure B). This is probably due to the relatively
lower abundance of sialyl-T on cell surface compared to other structures
such as total sialylated glycans and Neu5Acα-(2,3)-Gal glycans.[29,45] The conventional azido probe 3 requires a longer exposure
time to get a better signal but also with a higher background noise
(Figure S3). The 4 and 13 reporter pair does give a better signal than 3 and 12, but it is still much lower (around 4 times, Figure S4) than probe 10 as the
use of probe 10 does not need to undergo an additional
click reaction step. In fact, experiment showed that 100 μM
of 10 was sufficient for robust labeling (Figure E). Furthermore, the similar
results were also observed when above-mentioned labeling probes were
used to label another sialyl-T positive cell line colon cancerHT29
(Figure B). Indeed,
even for other truncated mucin-type O-glycans such as T antigen and
Tn antigen, it has been difficult to detect them by using the Western
blot method as their relatively lower abundance and weak affinity
of the currently available antibodies or lectins. Therefore, the described
strategy provides a sensitive way to detect sialyl-T.
Figure 3
(A) Structures of the
reporter probes used for biotinylation 3 and 4. (B) Western blot analysis of chemoenzymatic
labeling of breast cancer MCF7 and colon cancer HT29 cells (result
represents at least three repeats). (C) Imaging of cell surface sialyl-T
on MCF7 cells (green) by fluorescence microscopy. 200 ms acquisition
time for 10 + ST6GalNAc-IV group and 500 ms acquisition
time for the rest groups. Nuclei were stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole
(DAPI). (D) Comparison study of the relative labeling efficiency across
probes 3, 4, and 10. (E) MCF7
cells (∼5 × 107) were labeled with ST6GalNAc-IV
using variable concentrations of probe 10 (25–500
μM). See Supporting Information for
experimental details.
(A) Structures of the
reporter probes used for biotinylation 3 and 4. (B) Western blot analysis of chemoenzymatic
labeling of breast cancer MCF7 and colon cancerHT29 cells (result
represents at least three repeats). (C) Imaging of cell surface sialyl-T
on MCF7 cells (green) by fluorescence microscopy. 200 ms acquisition
time for 10 + ST6GalNAc-IV group and 500 ms acquisition
time for the rest groups. Nuclei were stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole
(DAPI). (D) Comparison study of the relative labeling efficiency across
probes 3, 4, and 10. (E) MCF7
cells (∼5 × 107) were labeled with ST6GalNAc-IV
using variable concentrations of probe 10 (25–500
μM). See Supporting Information for
experimental details.We next investigated whether the chemoenzymatic strategy
could
be used to image sialyl-T glycans in living cells. Adherent MCF7 was
labeled with probe 3, 4, or 10 as described above. Then, CuAAC (10 min, RT) was performed to biotinylate 3 and 4 with probe 12 and 13, respectively. The biotinylated samples were then stained
with Alexa Fluor 488 streptavidin (30 min, 4 °C) to install a
fluorescent reporter onto the sialyl-T. Strong fluorescence labeling
was observed in cells labeled with ST6GalNAc-IV and 10, while no labeling signal was observed in the absence of ST6GalNAc-IV,
confirming the specificity of the chemoenzymatic reaction in situ
(Figure C). Meanwhile,
only a very weak fluorescence signal was observed when using probe 3 or 4 even with a longer acquisition time (2.5
times longer than probe 10). As quantified by flow cytometry,
the use of probe 10 afforded around 12-fold higher labeling
efficiency than probe 4, or 30-fold higher than probe 3 (Figure D). Therefore, the use of probe 10 provides a sensitive
way to image cell surface sialyl-T antigen. More importantly, the
chemoenzymatic labeling strategy is independent of metabolic machinery
pathway, making it particularly useful in staining tissue biopsies.Next, this new labeling method was used to detect and compare the
expression levels of sialyl-T across different cell lines. MCF7, T47D
(breast cancer cell line), MDA-mb-231 (highly invasive breast cancer
cell line), HT29, Raw 264.7 (macrophage cell line), HEK293 (humanembryonic kidney cell line) cells were chemoenzymatically labeled
in suspension by ST6GalNAc-IV and 10, and stained with
the streptavidin conjugated with Alexa Fluor 488. The cells were untreated
or labeled in the absence of ST6GalNAc-IV were performed as controls.
As shown by flow cytometry analysis, all the well-known sialyl-T positive
cell lines including MCF7, T47D, and HT29 shows robust staining compared
to the control cells (Figure ), highlighting the feasibility of the described strategy
for use in living cell labeling. At the same time, much lower expression
of sialyl-T was observed in Raw 264.7 and HEK293. Interestingly, MDA-mb-231
displayed around a 3-fold decrease in sialyl-T expression on the surface
compared to MCF7 and T47D, indicating lower expression sialyl-T may
be an invasive biomarker of breast cancers. These results also demonstrate
that the described chemoenzymatic labeling approach can readily discriminate
different cell lines.
Figure 4
Flow cytometry analysis of the relative expression levels
of sialyl-T
across various cancer cell lines. Cells were untreated (red) or chemoenzymatically
labeled in the absence (green) or presence (blue) of ST6GalNAc-IV.
Quantification of the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) relative to
cells labeled in the absence of ST6GalNAc-IV is shown on the right.
Error bars represent data from triplicate experiments.
Flow cytometry analysis of the relative expression levels
of sialyl-T
across various cancer cell lines. Cells were untreated (red) or chemoenzymatically
labeled in the absence (green) or presence (blue) of ST6GalNAc-IV.
Quantification of the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) relative to
cells labeled in the absence of ST6GalNAc-IV is shown on the right.
Error bars represent data from triplicate experiments.
Global Profiling Sialyl-T-Attached Glycoproteins
on Cell Surface
We next used the described labeling strategy
to globally profile
sialyl-T-attached glycoproteins from cancer cell lines. It is well
established that sialyl-T-attached glycoproteins that located on cell
surface play important roles in living cells,[11] where these glycoproteins are the potential therapeutic targets
or biomarkers. However, there has been relatively little research
to identify or profile sialyl-T-attached glycoproteins due to the
lack of effective enrichment method. Taking advantage of the described
one-step labeling strategy, sialyl-T-attached proteins that located
on the cell surface (MCF7 and HT29) were biotinylated by ST6GalNAc-IV
and 10 (Figure ). The biotinylated proteins were captured using avidin agarose,
which has an extremely strong affinity toward biotin group (Kd = 10–14 to 10–15 M). After digestion with trypsin, the peptide fragments were analyzed
by tandem mass spectrometry. We successfully identified 78 cell surface
proteins in breast cancer MCF7 and 43 proteins in colon cancerHT29
(Table S2 and Table S3). Among the total
number of proteins, 14 are identified in both cell lines (Table S3). The classification of the identified
proteins by PANTHER system showed that proteins with binding activity
and catalytic activity are the two main classes in both cell lines
(Figure ). This is
different from the previous classification, in which proteins with
catalytic activity and transporter activity are two main classes of
total Neu5Acα-(2,3)-Gal glycans.[29] Many well-known sialylated cell adhesion molecules, such as integrin
and CD44,[49] are also identified in this
study. This finding may imply that sialyl-T plays certain roles in
protein binding and cell adhesion and migration. This result also
accords with the previous observations, in which truncated mucin-type
O-glycans have a strong relationship with tumor cell adhesion and
migration.[50]
Figure 5
(A) Scheme of global
profiling of sialyl-T-attached glycoproteins.
(B) Number of the identified proteins from MCF7 and HT29. (C) Classification
of the identified proteins by the PANTHER system.
(A) Scheme of global
profiling of sialyl-T-attached glycoproteins.
(B) Number of the identified proteins from MCF7 and HT29. (C) Classification
of the identified proteins by the PANTHER system.
Conclusions
In summary, on the basis of relaxed donor
specificity and strict
acceptor substrate specificity of humanST6GalNAc-IV, we have developed
a practical labeling method for visualization, quantification, and
enrichment analysis of sialyl-T antigen with excellent selectivity
and sensitivity. This method is far superior to the traditional lectin-based
detection method, which is limited by a time-consuming process and
relatively low accuracy. We found the popular two-step labeling approach
employing the click chemistry reaction does not work well to detect
sialyl-T as the relatively lower abundance of sialyl-T on cell surface,
while the one-step labeling strategy using CMP-Neu5Ac derivative 10 containing a triazole-linked biotin group provides a supersensitive
way to detect sialyl-T. We anticipate this work will accelerate the
study of investigating the function of sialyl-T epitope in a variety
of biological and pathological processes. Moreover, we found tolerance
of a large modification group such as biotin is not a proprietary
nature of some randomly selected enzymes. We have tested all the sialyltransferases
in our hand including various bacterial sialyltransferases (α-2,3-,
α-2,6-, and α-2,8-sialyltransferase)[51−53] and many human
sialyltransferases (α-2,3- and α-2,6-sialyltransferase).[54,55] All the tested sialyltransferases can well accept substrate with
a large modification group such as compounds 10 and 11 (results will be reported in due course), indicating acceptance
of large modification group is the common nature of the sialyltransferase
family. In addition, protein engineering of key amino acids will also
allow some other glycosyltransferases to accept substrates with a
large modification group.[56] This will make
a
one-step labeling strategy very popular in the future for use in analysis
of kinds of glycan epitopes by either in vitro chemoenzymatic
labeling or in vivo metabolic labeling method.
Authors: Ngalle Eric Mbua; Xiuru Li; Heather R Flanagan-Steet; Lu Meng; Kazuhiro Aoki; Kelley W Moremen; Margreet A Wolfert; Richard Steet; Geert-Jan Boons Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2013-10-15 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Andrea Niederwieser; Anne-Katrin Späte; Long Duc Nguyen; Christian Jüngst; Werner Reutter; Valentin Wittmann Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2013-03-06 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Petcharat Leoyklang; May Christine Malicdan; Tal Yardeni; Frank Celeste; Carla Ciccone; Xueli Li; Rong Jiang; William A Gahl; Nuria Carrillo-Carrasco; Miao He; Marjan Huizing Journal: Biomark Med Date: 2014 Impact factor: 2.851
Authors: A Harduin-Lepers; D C Stokes; W F Steelant; B Samyn-Petit; M A Krzewinski-Recchi; V Vallejo-Ruiz; J P Zanetta; C Augé; P Delannoy Journal: Biochem J Date: 2000-11-15 Impact factor: 3.857
Authors: Paula A Videira; Inês F Amado; Hélio J Crespo; M Carmen Algueró; Fabio Dall'Olio; M Guadalupe Cabral; Hélder Trindade Journal: Glycoconj J Date: 2007-12-13 Impact factor: 3.009
Authors: He Zhu; Shuaishuai Wang; Ding Liu; Lang Ding; Congcong Chen; Yunpeng Liu; Zhigang Wu; Roni Bollag; Kebin Liu; William Max Alexander; Jun Yin; Cheng Ma; Lei Li; Peng George Wang Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2020-04-15 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: Zhengliang L Wu; Anthony D Person; Andrew J Burton; Ravinder Singh; Barbara Burroughs; Dan Fryxell; Timothy J Tatge; Timothy Manning; Guoping Wu; Karl A D Swift; Vassili Kalabokis Journal: Glycobiology Date: 2019-10-21 Impact factor: 4.313