OBJECTIVE: Optimization of vancomycin dosing is difficult in children, given rapid drug clearance and patient heterogeneity. We sought to evaluate the impact of dosing using individual pharmacokinetic parameters on time to goal trough concentration in pediatric oncology patients. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted to assess vancomycin dosing in the pediatric oncology unit at Loma Linda University Children's Hospital between January 2013 and August 2013 (standard dosing group [SDG]). These patients were compared to those in a prospective arm that used pharmacokinetic dosing (pharmacokinetic dosing group [PKG]) between March 2014 and May 2015. Outcomes included percent of patients reaching a target trough by the specified time points, number of dose adjustments, number of serum concentrations drawn, and number of patients with supratherapeutic troughs. RESULTS: Of 35 patients meeting inclusion criteria for the SDG, 2 (5.7%) reached goal trough concentration by 48 hours, compared with 14 of 16 patients (87%) in the PKG (p = 0.0001). Significantly more patients reached their goal trough at each time point in the PKG. There was no difference in number of dose adjustments, but significantly more concentrations were drawn on average in the PKG (mean, 4.6 versus 3.1, p = 0.02). In the SDG and PKG, respectively, 1 patient and 3 patients had supratherapeutic trough concentrations (p = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Dosing using individual pharmacokinetic parameters led to a significant reduction in time to attain the desired vancomycin trough concentration in our pediatric oncology patients. Given the wide variation in dose requirements in this and other studies, application of patient-specific pharmacokinetics is essential to optimize vancomycin dosing in pediatric patients.
OBJECTIVE: Optimization of vancomycin dosing is difficult in children, given rapid drug clearance and patient heterogeneity. We sought to evaluate the impact of dosing using individual pharmacokinetic parameters on time to goal trough concentration in pediatric oncology patients. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted to assess vancomycin dosing in the pediatric oncology unit at Loma Linda University Children's Hospital between January 2013 and August 2013 (standard dosing group [SDG]). These patients were compared to those in a prospective arm that used pharmacokinetic dosing (pharmacokinetic dosing group [PKG]) between March 2014 and May 2015. Outcomes included percent of patients reaching a target trough by the specified time points, number of dose adjustments, number of serum concentrations drawn, and number of patients with supratherapeutic troughs. RESULTS: Of 35 patients meeting inclusion criteria for the SDG, 2 (5.7%) reached goal trough concentration by 48 hours, compared with 14 of 16 patients (87%) in the PKG (p = 0.0001). Significantly more patients reached their goal trough at each time point in the PKG. There was no difference in number of dose adjustments, but significantly more concentrations were drawn on average in the PKG (mean, 4.6 versus 3.1, p = 0.02). In the SDG and PKG, respectively, 1 patient and 3 patients had supratherapeutic trough concentrations (p = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Dosing using individual pharmacokinetic parameters led to a significant reduction in time to attain the desired vancomycin trough concentration in our pediatric oncology patients. Given the wide variation in dose requirements in this and other studies, application of patient-specific pharmacokinetics is essential to optimize vancomycin dosing in pediatric patients.
Entities:
Keywords:
Sawchuk-Zaske; oncology; pediatrics; pharmacokinetics; therapeutic drug monitoring; vancomycin
Authors: Michael Rybak; Ben Lomaestro; John C Rotschafer; Robert Moellering; William Craig; Marianne Billeter; Joseph R Dalovisio; Donald P Levine Journal: Am J Health Syst Pharm Date: 2009-01-01 Impact factor: 2.637
Authors: David S Gomez; Edvaldo V Campos; Rodrigo P de Azevedo; João Manoel da Silva; Marcus C Ferreira; Cristina Sanches-Giraud; Carlindo Vieira Silva; Silvia R C J Santos Journal: Burns Date: 2012-08-04 Impact factor: 2.744
Authors: George Sakoulas; George M Eliopoulos; Robert C Moellering; Richard P Novick; Lata Venkataraman; Christine Wennersten; Paola C DeGirolami; Mitchell J Schwaber; Howard S Gold Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2003-03-06 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Jennifer Le; John S Bradley; William Murray; Gale L Romanowski; Tu T Tran; Natalie Nguyen; Susan Cho; Stephanie Natale; Ivilynn Bui; Tri M Tran; Edmund V Capparelli Journal: Pediatr Infect Dis J Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 2.129
Authors: David F Gaieski; Mark E Mikkelsen; Roger A Band; Jesse M Pines; Richard Massone; Frances F Furia; Frances S Shofer; Munish Goyal Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Frederico Ribeiro Pires; Stefano Ivani de Paula; Artur Figueiredo Delgado; Werther Brunow de Carvalho; Nilo José Coelho Duarte; Ronaldo Morales Júnior; Silvia Regina Cavani Jorge Santos Journal: Rev Bras Ter Intensiva Date: 2020 Jul-Sep