Literature DB >> 2972080

Peritoneoscopy for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in females of reproductive age.

J Ragland1, J de la Garza, J McKenney.   

Abstract

The diagnosis of acute appendicitis in women of reproductive age can be a difficult clinical problem. A retrospective audit found our incidence of normal appendix removal in this patient population to be 42%. This study was undertaken to determine if the selective use of peritoneoscopy would improve the accuracy of diagnosis and thereby reduce the need for celiotomy in these patients. Peritoneoscopy was performed on 21 patients, and acute appendicitis was confirmed in 12 cases. Tubo-ovarian pathology was found in 5 patients, no pathology was found in 4 patients, and an unnecessary celiotomy was avoided in 8 patients. The incidence of normal appendix removal was reduced to 15%. There were no serious complications associated with peritoneoscopy. Diagnostic peritoneoscopy should be liberally employed in women of reproductive age with suspected appendicitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2972080     DOI: 10.1007/bf00591396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  10 in total

1.  Differential diagnosis of appendicitis and pelvic inflammatory disease. A prospective analysis.

Authors:  F Bongard; D V Landers; F Lewis
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 2.  Gynecologic laparoscopy. A review article.

Authors:  M Ohlgisser; Y Sorokin; M Heifetz
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 2.347

3.  The fate of the negative appendix.

Authors:  F C Chang; H H Hogle; D R Welling
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Appendicitis. A critical review of diagnosis and treatment in 1,000 cases.

Authors:  F R Lewis; J W Holcroft; J Boey; E Dunphy
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1975-05

5.  Laparoscopy in the prevention of unnecessary appendicectomies: a prospective study.

Authors:  A A Deutsch; A Zelikovsky; R Reiss
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 6.  Indications, contraindications and complications of laparoscopy.

Authors:  F D Loffer; D Pent
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 2.347

7.  Acute appendicitis. Prospective trial concerning diagnostic accuracy and complications.

Authors:  P Jess; B Bjerregaard; S Brynitz; J Holst-Christensen; E Kalaja; J Lund-Kristensen
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Appendectomy and the risk of tubal infertility.

Authors:  B A Mueller; J R Daling; D E Moore; N S Weiss; L R Spadoni; B V Stadel; M R Soules
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-12-11       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Appendicitis and mimicking conditions. A prospective study.

Authors:  O J Gilmore; J P Browett; P H Griffin; I K Ross; A J Brodribb; T J Cooke; M J Higgs; R C Williamson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1975-09-06       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Laparoscopy for questionable appendicitis: can it reduce the negative appendectomy rate?

Authors:  L L Leape; M L Ramenofsky
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 12.969

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Is laparoscopic better than open appendectomy?

Authors:  K N Apelgren; R G Molnar; J M Kisala
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic appendectomy using a clip applier.

Authors:  B G Cristalli; V Izard; D Jacob; M Levardon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Single-port laparoscopy assisted appendectomy under local pneumoperitoneum condition.

Authors:  H Inoue; K Takeshita; M Endo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.584

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.