| Literature DB >> 29720620 |
Selina Bopp1, Pamela Magistrado1, Wesley Wong1, Stephen F Schaffner1,2, Angana Mukherjee1, Pharath Lim3, Mehul Dhorda4,5,6, Chanaki Amaratunga3, Charles J Woodrow5, Elizabeth A Ashley6,7, Nicholas J White5,7, Arjen M Dondorp5,7, Rick M Fairhurst3, Frederic Ariey8, Didier Menard9,10,11, Dyann F Wirth1,2, Sarah K Volkman12,13,14.
Abstract
Multidrug resistant Plasmodium falciparum in Southeast Asia endangers regional malaria elimination and threatens to spread to other malaria endemic areas. Understanding mechanisms of piperaquine (PPQ) resistance is crucial for tracking its emergence and spread, and to develop effective strategies for overcoming it. Here we analyze a mechanism of PPQ resistance in Cambodian parasites. Isolates exhibit a bimodal dose-response curve when exposed to PPQ, with the area under the curve quantifying their survival in vitro. Increased copy number for plasmepsin II and plasmepsin III appears to explain enhanced survival when exposed to PPQ in most, but not all cases. A panel of isogenic subclones reinforces the importance of plasmepsin II-III copy number to enhanced PPQ survival. We conjecture that factors producing increased parasite survival under PPQ exposure in vitro may drive clinical PPQ failures in the field.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29720620 PMCID: PMC5931971 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-04104-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1Bimodal distribution of parasite response to PPQ exposure. The Area Under the Curve (AUC) value was determined using the local minima as boundaries to describe the parasite response to PPQ. Increasing the starting concentration and number of data points for the conventional SYBR Green dose–response curve a provided a better curve representation and brought percent survival to zero at higher concentrations. Bimodal growth was observed with increasing PPQ concentrations for a subset of parasites. Representative PPQ-resistant parasites KH004_057 (red) and KH001_053 (orange) and a PPQ-sensitive parasite KH004_051 (blue) are shown. Similar data for all 37 isolates tested can be found in Supplementary Fig. 1. Hypoxanthine assays b confirmed that these dose–response results were derived from viable parasites. All drug assays were done in triplicate and repeated two times, with the mean and s.d. shown for each concentration
Fig. 2PPQR parasites detected within both highly related and unrelated parasite populations. Identity By Descent (IBD) analysis was performed on 157 parasite isolates and a gray line connects parasites sharing > 90% of their genome sequences a. Parasites that were phenotyped for PPQ resistance are shown in color, and those not tested are shown in gray. PPQR and PPQS parasites are shown in red and blue, respectively, with the scale of AUC shown. A representative PPQS parasite (KH004_051) is labeled blue, an intermediate PPQR parasite (KH001_053) orange, and a highly-PPQR parasite (KH004_057) red. a shows all 157 parasites genotyped, and b shows all the phenotyped parasites from a
Fig. 3AUC correlates overall with plasmepsin II copy numbers but there are exceptions. a shows CNVs for plasmepsin II (blue) and pfmdr1 (red) that were estimated based upon average read depth of whole-genome sequencing data (+ s.d.) and confirmed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. b shows the Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the parasite lines tested (N = 3, mean+ s.d.). c shows the distribution of all parasite lines binned into CNV of 1 (blue) or> 1 (red, average > 1.6) for pfmdr1 or plasmepsin II, relative to the AUC values, to show the negative correlation for pfmdr1 (unpaired Student’s t-test, p = 0.0021, ** p < 0.01) and the positive correlation for plasmepsin II (p = 0.0023). d Combining pfmdr1 and plasmepsin II CNVs, only parasites with pfmdr1 = 1 and plasmepsin II > 1 CNVs are significantly different than the other combinations in regards to the AUC (one-way ANOVA, Tukey corrected). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01. Each data point in c and d represents the mean of three independent assays run in triplicate. The overall mean and s.d. is shown with black bars
Fig. 4Isogenic lines confirm association between plasmepsin II CNV and AUC. a Subclones of KH001_053, identical by a 24-SNP barcode (all clones) and WGS (3 sequenced clones), had variable plasmepsin II CNV levels but only a single pfmdr1 copy. b Isolates with > 90% relatedness vary in plasmepsin II and pfmdr1 CNVs. Plasmepsin II CNV levels correlated with AUC values, confirming that this locus has a role in conferring PPQ resistance. All drug assays were done in triplicate and repeated two times, shown are the means with s.d. CNVs are shown as mean+ s.d. from three biological replicates done in quadruplicate by qPCR a or as average read depth of whole-genome sequencing+ s.d. in b
Fig. 5Late-stage parasites are less susceptible to PPQ and resistant parasites can tolerate high PPQ doses for 12 h. PPQS (KH004_051, blue) and PPQR (KH004_057, red) were synchronized and exposed to PPQ for 12 h, and their ability to survive to the next life cycle was visualized by microscopy a to determine both stage and parasitemia b. Representative images a and parasite stage distribution (blue = ring, red = trophozoite, green = schizont, purple = gametocyte, and yellow = dead) were calculated and represented by pie charts. Parasitemias resulting from these PPQ exposures were analyzed by FACS 72 h after exposure b. Under high drug concentrations (10 µM, a), there is evidence that the PPQR parasite (KH004_057, red) can tolerate 12 h of PPQ exposure up to 2000 nM. Conversely, the PPQS parasite (KH004_051, blue) does not survive at PPQ concentrations of ≥ 200 nM, except a few parasites that survive in the later (36–48 h) time of exposure, where there was evidence of some parasite survival