| Literature DB >> 29719853 |
Joao Leote1,2, Rita G Nunes3, Luis Cerqueira4, Ricardo Loução1, Hugo A Ferreira1.
Abstract
Tractography studies for pre-surgical planning of primary brain tumors is typically done using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), which cannot resolve crossing, kissing or highly angulated fibres. Tractography based on the estimation of the diffusion kurtosis (DK) tensor was recently demonstrated to enable tackling these limitations. However, its use in the clinical context at low 1.5T field has not yet been reported.Entities:
Keywords: Brain tumor; CST, corticospinal tract; Corticospinal tract; DI, deviation index; DKI, diffusion kurtosis imaging; DTI, diffusion tensor imaging; DWI, diffusion-weighted images; Diffusion kurtosis imaging; FA, fractional anisotropy; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; SD, standard deviation; Tractography
Year: 2018 PMID: 29719853 PMCID: PMC5926250 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejro.2018.01.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Radiol Open ISSN: 2352-0477
Fig. 1Transverse contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images (T1), echo planar images (EPI), fractional anisotropy (FA) maps and diffusion kurtosis invariant metrics (AK: axial kurtosis; MK: mean kurtosis; RK: radial kurtosis) maps of a healthy subject and patients with gliomas. Note the distortion of the fibres with cranial-caudal direction (i.e. coloured in blue) produced by the tumor in the pathological hemispheres. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 2Mean tract sizes for whole-brain (A) and corticospinal (B) tractography of healthy subjects and patients groups (error bars translate standard deviation). Statistically significant differences in tracts and voxel numbers between groups were not found despite the smaller standard deviation in patients’ corticospinal tract (CST) size. Representative streamlined fibre bundles of CST are also presented (C). Note the pronounced mass effect imposed by the tumor presence in CST’s and their close proximity.
Diffusion metrics, asymmetry index and deviation of delineated corticospinal tracts.
| Patients | FA | MD | AD | RD | MK | AK | RK | DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.2 (0.4) | 0.9 (0.1) | 2.3 (0.1) | 1.3 (0.1) | 1.0 (0.04) | 0.7 (0.02) | 1.1 (0.1) | 0.17 |
| 2 | 0.3 (0.2) | 1.1 (0.1) | 1.7 (0.2) | 1.4 (0.1) | 1.0 (0.03) | 0.6 (0.01) | 1.2 (0.2) | 0.12 |
| 3 | 0.2 (0.4) | 0.9 (0.2) | 1.6 (0.2) | 1.4 (0.2) | 0.8 (0.04) | 0.5 (0.01) | 1.0 (0.1) | 0.14 |
| Mean ± SD | 0.23 | 0.96 ± 0.11 (0.009) | 1.8 ± 0.10 (0.008) | 1.3 | 0.89 ± 0.11 (0.14) | 0.60 ± 0.05 (0.09) | 1.14 ± 0.11 (0.07) | 0.14 |
| Healthy subjects group Mean ± SD | 0.54 ± 0.03 (0.04) | 0.86 ± 0.06 (0.002) | 1.7 ± 0.10 (0.006) | 0.8 ± 0.09 (0.05) | 1.08 ± 0.10 (0.02) | 0.84 ± 0.12 (0.03) | 1.28 ± 0.32 (0.03) | 0.02 ± 0.03 |
FA – Fractional anisotropy; MD – Mean diffusivity; AD – Axial diffusivity; RD – Radial diffusivity; MK – Mean kurtosis; AK – Axial kurtosis; RK – Radial kurtosis; DI – Deviation index of corticospinal tract; SD – standard deviation.
The values between parenthesis refer to the asymmetry index in comparison with the contralateral hemisphere.
Diffusivities are presented in units of 10−3 mm2/s.
Statistically significant (p < 0.05) differences for evaluated parameter values between healthy subjects and patients.