Literature DB >> 29716955

Evolutionary Pathways for the Generation of New Self-Incompatibility Haplotypes in a Nonself-Recognition System.

Katarína Bod'ová1,2, Tadeas Priklopil1,3, David L Field4,5, Nicholas H Barton4, Melinda Pickup4.   

Abstract

Self-incompatibility (SI) is a genetically based recognition system that functions to prevent self-fertilization and mating among related plants. An enduring puzzle in SI is how the high diversity observed in nature arises and is maintained. Based on the underlying recognition mechanism, SI can be classified into two main groups: self-recognition (SR) and nonself-recognition (NSR). Most work has focused on diversification within SR systems despite expected differences between the two groups in the evolutionary pathways and outcomes of diversification. Here, we use a deterministic population genetic model and stochastic simulations to investigate how novel S-haplotypes evolve in a gametophytic NSR [SRNase/S Locus F-box (SLF)] SI system. For this model, the pathways for diversification involve either the maintenance or breakdown of SI and can vary in the order of mutations of the female (SRNase) and male (SLF) components. We show analytically that diversification can occur with high inbreeding depression and self-pollination, but this varies with evolutionary pathway and level of completeness (which determines the number of potential mating partners in the population), and, in general, is more likely for lower haplotype number. The conditions for diversification are broader in stochastic simulations of finite population size. However, the number of haplotypes observed under high inbreeding and moderate-to-high self-pollination is less than that commonly observed in nature. Diversification was observed through pathways that maintain SI as well as through self-compatible intermediates. Yet the lifespan of diversified haplotypes was sensitive to their level of completeness. By examining diversification in a NSR SI system, this model extends our understanding of the evolution and maintenance of haplotype diversity observed in a recognition system common in flowering plants.
Copyright © 2018 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  S-locus F-Box; SRNase; balancing selection; diversification; inbreeding depression; self-incompatibility

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29716955      PMCID: PMC6028250          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.118.300748

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  29 in total

1.  On the origin of self-incompatibility haplotypes: transition through self-compatible intermediates.

Authors:  M K Uyenoyama; Y Zhang; E Newbigin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Specificity determinants and diversification of the Brassica self-incompatibility pollen ligand.

Authors:  Thanat Chookajorn; Aardra Kachroo; Daniel R Ripoll; Andrew G Clark; June B Nasrallah
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-12-23       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Plant self-incompatibility in natural populations: a critical assessment of recent theoretical and empirical advances.

Authors:  Vincent Castric; Xavier Vekemans
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.185

4.  Analysis of inbreeding depression in mixed-mating plants provides evidence for selective interference and stable mixed mating.

Authors:  Alice A Winn; Elizabeth Elle; Susan Kalisz; Pierre-Olivier Cheptou; Christopher G Eckert; Carol Goodwillie; Mark O Johnston; David A Moeller; Richard H Ree; Risa D Sargent; Mario Vallejo-Marín
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Collaborative non-self recognition system in S-RNase-based self-incompatibility.

Authors:  Ken-ichi Kubo; Tetsuyuki Entani; Akie Takara; Ning Wang; Allison M Fields; Zhihua Hua; Mamiko Toyoda; Shin-ichi Kawashima; Toshio Ando; Akira Isogai; Teh-hui Kao; Seiji Takayama
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  THE EVOLUTION OF SELF-FERTILIZATION AND INBREEDING DEPRESSION IN PLANTS. I. GENETIC MODELS.

Authors:  Russell Lande; Douglas W Schemske
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Genetic architecture of inbreeding depression and the maintenance of gametophytic self-incompatibility.

Authors:  Camille Gervais; Diala Abu Awad; Denis Roze; Vincent Castric; Sylvain Billiard
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 8.  On the importance of balancing selection in plants.

Authors:  Lynda F Delph; John K Kelly
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 10.151

9.  Repeated adaptive introgression at a gene under multiallelic balancing selection.

Authors:  Vincent Castric; Jesper Bechsgaard; Mikkel H Schierup; Xavier Vekemans
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  4 in total

1.  Invasion and Extinction Dynamics of Mating Types Under Facultative Sexual Reproduction.

Authors:  Peter Czuppon; George W A Constable
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Development of first linkage map for Silphium integrifolium (Asteraceae) enables identification of sporophytic self-incompatibility locus.

Authors:  John H Price; Andrew R Raduski; Yaniv Brandvain; David L Van Tassel; Kevin P Smith
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 3.832

3.  Origin, loss, and regain of self-incompatibility in angiosperms.

Authors:  Hong Zhao; Yue Zhang; Hui Zhang; Yanzhai Song; Fei Zhao; Yu'e Zhang; Sihui Zhu; Hongkui Zhang; Zhendiao Zhou; Han Guo; Miaomiao Li; Junhui Li; Qiang Gao; Qianqian Han; Huaqiu Huang; Lucy Copsey; Qun Li; Hua Chen; Enrico Coen; Yijing Zhang; Yongbiao Xue
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 11.277

4.  Mating system variation in hybrid zones: facilitation, barriers and asymmetries to gene flow.

Authors:  Melinda Pickup; Yaniv Brandvain; Christelle Fraïsse; Sarah Yakimowski; Nicholas H Barton; Tanmay Dixit; Christian Lexer; Eva Cereghetti; David L Field
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 10.151

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.