Literature DB >> 22133210

Analysis of inbreeding depression in mixed-mating plants provides evidence for selective interference and stable mixed mating.

Alice A Winn1, Elizabeth Elle, Susan Kalisz, Pierre-Olivier Cheptou, Christopher G Eckert, Carol Goodwillie, Mark O Johnston, David A Moeller, Richard H Ree, Risa D Sargent, Mario Vallejo-Marín.   

Abstract

Hermaphroditic individuals can produce both selfed and outcrossed progeny, termed mixed mating. General theory predicts that mixed-mating populations should evolve quickly toward high rates of selfing, driven by rapid purging of genetic load and loss of inbreeding depression (ID), but the substantial number of mixed-mating species observed in nature calls this prediction into question. Lower average ID reported for selfing than for outcrossing populations is consistent with purging and suggests that mixed-mating taxa in evolutionary transition will have intermediate ID. We compared the magnitude of ID from published estimates for highly selfing (r > 0.8), mixed-mating (0.2 ≤ r ≥ 0.8), and highly outcrossing (r < 0.2) plant populations across 58 species. We found that mixed-mating and outcrossing taxa have equally high average lifetime ID (δ= 0.58 and 0.54, respectively) and similar ID at each of four life-cycle stages. These results are not consistent with evolution toward selfing in most mixed-mating taxa. We suggest that prevention of purging by selective interference could explain stable mixed mating in many natural populations. We identify critical gaps in the empirical data on ID and outline key approaches to filling them.
© 2011 The Author(s). Evolution© 2011 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22133210     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01462.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  44 in total

1.  Dichogamy correlates with outcrossing rate and defines the selfing syndrome in the mixed-mating genus Collinsia.

Authors:  Susan Kalisz; April Randle; David Chaiffetz; Melisa Faigeles; Aileen Butera; Craig Beight
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Variability of individual genetic load: consequences for the detection of inbreeding depression.

Authors:  Gwendal Restoux; Priscille Huot de Longchamp; Bruno Fady; Etienne K Klein
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  A comparison of floral integration between selfing and outcrossing species: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Juan Fornoni; Mariano Ordano; Rubén Pérez-Ishiwara; Karina Boege; César A Domínguez
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Microevolutionary distribution of isogenicity in a self-fertilizing fish (Kryptolebias marmoratus) in the Florida Keys.

Authors:  Andrey Tatarenkov; Ryan L Earley; D Scott Taylor; John C Avise
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 3.326

Review 5.  The evolution of plant reproductive systems: how often are transitions irreversible?

Authors:  Spencer C H Barrett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Maintenance of Quantitative Genetic Variance Under Partial Self-Fertilization, with Implications for Evolution of Selfing.

Authors:  Russell Lande; Emmanuelle Porcher
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Variation in pollen limitation and floral parasitism across a mating system transition in a Pacific coastal dune plant: evolutionary causes or ecological consequences?

Authors:  Sara Dart; Christopher G Eckert
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 4.357

8.  Pollen dispersal and breeding structure in a hawkmoth-pollinated Pampa grasslands species Petunia axillaris (Solanaceae).

Authors:  Caroline Turchetto; Jacqueline S Lima; Daniele M Rodrigues; Sandro L Bonatto; Loreta B Freitas
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 9.  Does the evolution of self-fertilization rescue populations or increase the risk of extinction?

Authors:  P-O Cheptou
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.357

10.  Drift load in populations of small size and low density.

Authors:  Y Willi; P Griffin; J Van Buskirk
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 3.821

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.