Literature DB >> 25065256

Genetic architecture of inbreeding depression and the maintenance of gametophytic self-incompatibility.

Camille Gervais1, Diala Abu Awad, Denis Roze, Vincent Castric, Sylvain Billiard.   

Abstract

Gametophytic self-incompatibility (GSI) is a widespread genetic system, which enables hermaphroditic plants to avoid self-fertilization and mating with close relatives. Inbreeding depression is thought to be the major force maintaining SI; however, inbreeding depression is a dynamical variable that depends in particular on the mating system. In this article we use multilocus, individual-based simulations to examine the coevolution of SI and inbreeding depression within finite populations. We focus on the conditions for the maintenance of SI when self-compatible (SC) mutants are introduced in the population by recurrent mutation, and compare simulation results with predictions from an analytical model treating inbreeding depression as a fixed parameter (thereby neglecting effects of purging within the SC subpopulation). In agreement with previous models, we observe that the maintenance of SI is associated with high inbreeding depression and is facilitated by high rates of self-pollination. Purging of deleterious mutations by SC mutants has little effect on the spread of those mutants as long as most deleterious alleles have weak fitness effects: in this case, the genetic architecture of inbreeding depression has little effect on the maintenance of SI. By contrast, purging may greatly enhance the spread of SC mutants when deleterious alleles have strong fitness effects.
© 2014 The Author(s). Evolution © 2014 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deleterious mutation; inbreeding depression; purging; self-incompatibility

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25065256     DOI: 10.1111/evo.12495

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  6 in total

1.  Evolutionary Pathways for the Generation of New Self-Incompatibility Haplotypes in a Nonself-Recognition System.

Authors:  Katarína Bod'ová; Tadeas Priklopil; David L Field; Nicholas H Barton; Melinda Pickup
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Widespread coexistence of self-compatible and self-incompatible phenotypes in a diallelic self-incompatibility system in Ligustrum vulgare (Oleaceae).

Authors:  Isabelle De Cauwer; Philippe Vernet; Pierre Saumitou-Laprade; Sylvain Billiard; Cécile Godé; Angélique Bourceaux; Chloé Ponitzki
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2021-09-04       Impact factor: 3.832

3.  Benefits of gene flow are mediated by individual variability in self-compatibility in small isolated populations of an endemic plant species.

Authors:  Christopher T Frye; Maile C Neel
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 5.183

4.  Patterns of Polymorphism at the Self-Incompatibility Locus in 1,083 Arabidopsis thaliana Genomes.

Authors:  Takashi Tsuchimatsu; Pauline M Goubet; Sophie Gallina; Anne-Catherine Holl; Isabelle Fobis-Loisy; Hélène Bergès; William Marande; Elisa Prat; Dazhe Meng; Quan Long; Alexander Platzer; Magnus Nordborg; Xavier Vekemans; Vincent Castric
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  Inbreeding depression under mixed outcrossing, self-fertilization and sib-mating.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Porcher; Russell Lande
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 3.260

6.  Feed-backs among inbreeding, inbreeding depression in sperm traits, and sperm competition can drive evolution of costly polyandry.

Authors:  Greta Bocedi; Jane M Reid
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 3.694

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.