| Literature DB >> 29714358 |
Ipek Oguz1, Aaron Carass2,3, Dzung L Pham4, Snehashis Roy4, Nagesh Subbana1, Peter A Calabresi5, Paul A Yushkevich1, Russell T Shinohara6, Jerry L Prince2,3.
Abstract
The Dice overlap ratio is commonly used to evaluate the performance of image segmentation algorithms. While Dice overlap is very useful as a standardized quantitative measure of segmentation accuracy in many applications, it offers a very limited picture of segmentation quality in complex segmentation tasks where the number of target objects is not known a priori, such as the segmentation of white matter lesions or lung nodules. While Dice overlap can still be used in these applications, segmentation algorithms may perform quite differently in ways not reflected by differences in their Dice score. Here we propose a new set of evaluation techniques that offer new insights into the behavior of segmentation algorithms. We illustrate these techniques with a case study comparing two popular multiple sclerosis (MS) lesion segmentation algorithms: OASIS and LesionTOADS.Entities:
Keywords: Evaluation; Lesion; MS; Segmentation
Year: 2018 PMID: 29714358 PMCID: PMC5920690 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-75238-9_1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brainlesion