Bernard Zinman1, Silvio E Inzucchi2, Christoph Wanner3, Uwe Hehnke4, Jyothis T George4, Odd Erik Johansen5, David Fitchett6. 1. Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. 2. Section of Endocrinology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. 3. Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Würzburg University Clinic, Würzburg, Germany. 4. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Ingelheim, Germany. 5. Boehringer Ingelheim Norway KS, Drengsrudbekken 8, PO Box 405, N-1373, Asker, Norway. odd_erik.johansen@boehringer-ingelheim.com. 6. Division of Cardiology, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The global epidemic of type 2 diabetes affects women and men equally; however, the relative impact on the cardiovascular (CV) system appears greater for women than men when compared with peers without diabetes. Furthermore, women are often under-represented in CV outcome trials, resulting in less certainty about the impact of CV prevention therapies across the sexes. The EMPA-REG OUTCOME® trial, which included 28.5% women, found that empagliflozin, given in addition to standard of care, reduced the risk of CV death by 38%, heart failure (HF) hospitalisation by 35% and a composite endpoint for incident or worsening nephropathy by 39%. Here we report a secondary analysis of the trial to determine the relative effects of empagliflozin in women vs men. METHODS: The population studied were individuals with type 2 diabetes (HbA1c 53-86 mmol/mol [7-10%] and eGFR >30 ml min-1 [1.73 m]-2), with established atherosclerotic CV disease. Individuals were randomised to receive empagliflozin 10 mg or 25 mg, or placebo once daily in addition to standard of care, and followed. The trial continued until ≥691 individuals had experienced an adjudicated event included in the primary outcome. All CV outcome events, including HF hospitalisations and deaths were prospectively adjudicated by blinded clinical events committees. RESULTS: At baseline, the demographic profile of the 2004 women (age ± standard deviation 63.6 ± 8.8 years) compared with the 5016 men (age 63.0 ± 8.6 years) in the trial was largely similar, with the exception that LDL-cholesterol was numerically higher in women (2.5 ± 1.0 vs 2.1 ± 0.9 mmol/l), consistent with lower rates of lipid-lowering therapies (75.4% vs 83.2%). Women were also less likely to have smoked (31.5% vs 69.9%). The annualised incidence rate for women in the placebo group was numerically lower than in men for CV death (1.58% vs 2.19%), numerically higher for HF hospitalisation (1.75% vs 1.33%) and similar for renal events (7.22% vs 7.75%). We did not detect any effect modification by sex within the statistical power restrictions of the analysis for CV death, HF hospitalisation and incident or worsening nephropathy (interaction p values 0.32, 0.20 and 0.85, respectively). Compared with placebo, empagliflozin increased the rates of genital infections in both women (2.5% vs 10.0%) and men (1.5% vs 2.6%). CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION:CV death, HF hospitalisation and incident or worsening nephropathy rate reductions induced by empagliflozin were not different between women and men.
RCT Entities:
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The global epidemic of type 2 diabetes affects women and men equally; however, the relative impact on the cardiovascular (CV) system appears greater for women than men when compared with peers without diabetes. Furthermore, women are often under-represented in CV outcome trials, resulting in less certainty about the impact of CV prevention therapies across the sexes. The EMPA-REG OUTCOME® trial, which included 28.5% women, found that empagliflozin, given in addition to standard of care, reduced the risk of CV death by 38%, heart failure (HF) hospitalisation by 35% and a composite endpoint for incident or worsening nephropathy by 39%. Here we report a secondary analysis of the trial to determine the relative effects of empagliflozin in women vs men. METHODS: The population studied were individuals with type 2 diabetes (HbA1c 53-86 mmol/mol [7-10%] and eGFR >30 ml min-1 [1.73 m]-2), with established atherosclerotic CV disease. Individuals were randomised to receive empagliflozin 10 mg or 25 mg, or placebo once daily in addition to standard of care, and followed. The trial continued until ≥691 individuals had experienced an adjudicated event included in the primary outcome. All CV outcome events, including HF hospitalisations and deaths were prospectively adjudicated by blinded clinical events committees. RESULTS: At baseline, the demographic profile of the 2004 women (age ± standard deviation 63.6 ± 8.8 years) compared with the 5016 men (age 63.0 ± 8.6 years) in the trial was largely similar, with the exception that LDL-cholesterol was numerically higher in women (2.5 ± 1.0 vs 2.1 ± 0.9 mmol/l), consistent with lower rates of lipid-lowering therapies (75.4% vs 83.2%). Women were also less likely to have smoked (31.5% vs 69.9%). The annualised incidence rate for women in the placebo group was numerically lower than in men for CV death (1.58% vs 2.19%), numerically higher for HF hospitalisation (1.75% vs 1.33%) and similar for renal events (7.22% vs 7.75%). We did not detect any effect modification by sex within the statistical power restrictions of the analysis for CV death, HF hospitalisation and incident or worsening nephropathy (interaction p values 0.32, 0.20 and 0.85, respectively). Compared with placebo, empagliflozin increased the rates of genital infections in both women (2.5% vs 10.0%) and men (1.5% vs 2.6%). CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION:CV death, HF hospitalisation and incident or worsening nephropathy rate reductions induced by empagliflozin were not different between women and men.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cardiovascular disease; Heart failure; Mortality; SGLT2 inhibition; Type 2 diabetes; Women
Authors: Bernard Zinman; Christoph Wanner; John M Lachin; David Fitchett; Erich Bluhmki; Stefan Hantel; Michaela Mattheus; Theresa Devins; Odd Erik Johansen; Hans J Woerle; Uli C Broedl; Silvio E Inzucchi Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-09-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Deepa M Gopal; Andreas P Kalogeropoulos; Vasiliki V Georgiopoulou; Andrew L Smith; Douglas C Bauer; Anne B Newman; Lauren Kim; Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; Hillary Tindle; Tamara B Harris; Wilson W H Tang; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Javed Butler Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Christoph Wanner; Silvio E Inzucchi; John M Lachin; David Fitchett; Maximilian von Eynatten; Michaela Mattheus; Odd Erik Johansen; Hans J Woerle; Uli C Broedl; Bernard Zinman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-06-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: David Fitchett; Javed Butler; Philippe van de Borne; Bernard Zinman; John M Lachin; Christoph Wanner; Hans J Woerle; Stefan Hantel; Jyothis T George; Odd Erik Johansen; Silvio E Inzucchi Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Nikolaus Marx; Julio Rosenstock; Steven E Kahn; Bernard Zinman; John J Kastelein; John M Lachin; Mark A Espeland; Erich Bluhmki; Michaela Mattheus; Bart Ryckaert; Sanjay Patel; Odd Erik Johansen; Hans-Juergen Woerle Journal: Diab Vasc Dis Res Date: 2015-03-15 Impact factor: 3.291
Authors: David Fitchett; Bernard Zinman; Christoph Wanner; John M Lachin; Stefan Hantel; Afshin Salsali; Odd Erik Johansen; Hans J Woerle; Uli C Broedl; Silvio E Inzucchi Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2016-01-26 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Yun Shen; Lizheng Shi; Elizabeth Nauman; Peter T Katzmarzyk; Eboni G Price-Haywood; Ping Yin; Alessandra N Bazzano; Somesh Nigam; Gang Hu Journal: J Diabetes Date: 2018-11-13 Impact factor: 4.006
Authors: Amy G Huebschmann; Rachel R Huxley; Wendy M Kohrt; Philip Zeitler; Judith G Regensteiner; Jane E B Reusch Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2019-08-27 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Mariam Elmegaard Malik; Charlotte Andersson; Paul Blanche; Maria D'Souza; Christian Madelaire; Bochra Zareini; Morten Lamberts; Søren Lund Kristensen; Naveed Sattar; John McMurray; Lars Køber; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Gunnar Gislason; Morten Schou Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2022-04-08 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Mildren A Del-Sueldo; María A Mendonça-Rivera; Martha B Sánchez-Zambrano; Judith Zilberman; Ana G Múnera-Echeverri; María Paniagua; Lourdes Campos-Alcántara; Claudia Almonte; Amalia Paix-Gonzales; Claudia V Anchique-Santos; Claudine J Coronel; Gabriela Castillo; María G Parra-Machuca; Ivanna Duro; Paola Varletta; Patricia Delgado; Verónica I Volberg; Adriana C Puente-Barragán; Adriana Rodríguez; Aida Rotta-Rotta; Anabela Fernández; Ana C Izeta-Gutiérrez; Ana E Ancona-Vadillo; Analía Aquieri; Andrea Corrales; Andrea Simeone; Bibiana Rubilar; Carolina Artucio; Carolina Pimentel-Fernández; Celi Marques-Santos; Clara Saldarriaga; Christian Chávez; Cristina Cáceres; Dahiana Ibarrola; Daniela Barranco; Edison Muñoz-Ortiz; Edith D Ruiz-Gastelum; Eduardo Bianco; Elena Murguía; Enrique Soto; Fabiola Rodríguez-Caballero; Fanny Otiniano-Costa; Giovanna Valentino; Iris B Rodríguez-Cermeño; Ivan R Rivera; Jairo A Gándara-Ricardo; Jesús A Velásquez-Penagos; Judith Torales; Karina Scavenius; Karen Dueñas-Criado; Laura García; Laura Roballo; Lucía R Kazelian; Macarena Coussirat-Liendo; María C Costa-Almeida; Mariana Drever; Mariela Lujambio; Marildes L Castro; Maritza Rodríguez-Sifuentes; Mónica Acevedo; Mónica Giambruno; Mónica Ramírez; Nancy Gómez; Narcisa Gutiérrez-Castillo; Onelia Greatty; Paola Harwicz; Patricia Notaro; Rocío Falcón; Rosario López; Sady Montefilpo; Sara Ramírez-Flores; Silvina Verdugo; Soledad Murguía; Sonia Constantini; Thais C Vieira; Virginia Michelis; César M Serra Journal: Arch Cardiol Mex Date: 2022
Authors: Michelle L O'Donoghue; Eri T Kato; Ofri Mosenzon; Sabina A Murphy; Avivit Cahn; Marisol Herrera; Tsvetalina Tankova; Alena Šmahelová; Piera Merlini; Ingrid Gause-Nilsson; Anna Maria Langkilde; Darren K McGuire; John P H Wilding; Larry A Leiter; Deepak L Bhatt; Itamar Raz; Marc S Sabatine; Stephen D Wiviott Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2021-02-20 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Silvio E Inzucchi; Kamlesh Khunti; David H Fitchett; Christoph Wanner; Michaela Mattheus; Jyothis T George; Anne Pernille Ofstad; Bernard Zinman Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2020-09-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Clemens Engler; Marco Leo; Bernhard Pfeifer; Martin Juchum; Di Chen-Koenig; Karin Poelzl; Hans Schoenherr; David Vill; Juliana Oberdanner; Egon Eisendle; Klaus Middeldorf; Bernhard Heindl; Hannes Gaenzer; Gerald Bode; Karl Kirchmeyr; Guenther Ladner; Lisa Rieger; Ursula Koellensperger; Andrea Schwaiger; Florian Stoeckl; Guenther Zangerl; Monika Lechleitner; Irmgard Delmarko; Wilhelm Oberaigner; Clemens Rissbacher; Herbert Tilg; Christoph Ebenbichler Journal: BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Date: 2020-09