OBJECTIVES: The prevalence of diabetes has increased in the recent decades and optimum glycemic control is required to reduce morbidity and mortality. We meta-analyzed randomized controlled trials in order to assess the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin compared to placebo in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. METHODS: We included double-blind, placebo controlled trials of empagliflozin that evaluated glycemic efficacy and safety (10 mg or 25 mg) either as monotherapy or as add-on to existing diabetes pharmacotherapy. RESULTS: The results demonstrated significant improvements in HbA1c (SMD -0.929%, 95 % CI -1.064 to -0.793, for 10 mg and -1.064%, 95 % CI -1.184 to -0.944, for 25 mg) and FPG (SMD -0.929%, 95 % CI -1.064 to -0.793, for 10 mg and -1.064%, 95 % CI -1.184 to -0.944, for 25 mg) with empagliflozin monotherapy (n = 609) compared to placebo. Significant improvements in HbA1c [SMD -1.582%, 95% CI -2.164 to -1.000, for 10 mg (n = 1079) and -1.668%, 95% CI -2.260 to -1.077, for 25 mg (n = 1070)] and FPG [SMD -0.865 mmol/L, 95 % CI -1.309 to -0.420, for 10 mg (n = 854) and -0.996 mmol/L, 95% CI -1.456 to -0.536, for 25 mg (n = 854)] were also observed in empagliflozin add-on therapy trials. Reductions in blood pressure and body weight were also seen in both monotherapy and add-on therapy. Empagliflozin was associated with increased risk of hypoglycemia, genital and urinary tract infections (OR 1.043, 2.814, 1.119 respectively). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis shows empagliflozin is safe and effective for the treatment of T2DM along with existing diabetes pharmacotherapy.
OBJECTIVES: The prevalence of diabetes has increased in the recent decades and optimum glycemic control is required to reduce morbidity and mortality. We meta-analyzed randomized controlled trials in order to assess the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin compared to placebo in type 2 diabetes mellituspatients. METHODS: We included double-blind, placebo controlled trials of empagliflozin that evaluated glycemic efficacy and safety (10 mg or 25 mg) either as monotherapy or as add-on to existing diabetes pharmacotherapy. RESULTS: The results demonstrated significant improvements in HbA1c (SMD -0.929%, 95 % CI -1.064 to -0.793, for 10 mg and -1.064%, 95 % CI -1.184 to -0.944, for 25 mg) and FPG (SMD -0.929%, 95 % CI -1.064 to -0.793, for 10 mg and -1.064%, 95 % CI -1.184 to -0.944, for 25 mg) with empagliflozin monotherapy (n = 609) compared to placebo. Significant improvements in HbA1c [SMD -1.582%, 95% CI -2.164 to -1.000, for 10 mg (n = 1079) and -1.668%, 95% CI -2.260 to -1.077, for 25 mg (n = 1070)] and FPG [SMD -0.865 mmol/L, 95 % CI -1.309 to -0.420, for 10 mg (n = 854) and -0.996 mmol/L, 95% CI -1.456 to -0.536, for 25 mg (n = 854)] were also observed in empagliflozin add-on therapy trials. Reductions in blood pressure and body weight were also seen in both monotherapy and add-on therapy. Empagliflozin was associated with increased risk of hypoglycemia, genital and urinary tract infections (OR 1.043, 2.814, 1.119 respectively). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis shows empagliflozin is safe and effective for the treatment of T2DM along with existing diabetes pharmacotherapy.
Authors: Bernard Zinman; Silvio E Inzucchi; Christoph Wanner; Uwe Hehnke; Jyothis T George; Odd Erik Johansen; David Fitchett Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2018-04-30 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Fahad M Althobaiti; Safaa M Alsanosi; Alaa H Falemban; Abdullah R Alzahrani; Salma A Fataha; Sara O Salih; Ali M Alrumaih; Khalid N Alotaibi; Hazim M Althobaiti; Saeed S Al-Ghamdi; Nahla Ayoub Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-08-16 Impact factor: 4.964