| Literature DB >> 29713345 |
Kujtim Sh Shala1, Linda J Dula1, Teuta Pustina-Krasniqi1, Teuta Bicaj1, Enis F Ahmedi1, Zana Lila-Krasniqi1, Arlinda Tmava-Dragusha1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the level of adaptation of patients to newly fitted complete dentures in their dominant and nondominant sides, by means of ElectromyoFigureic signals.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29713345 PMCID: PMC5866849 DOI: 10.1155/2018/2412084
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Dent ISSN: 1687-8728
Comparison of gender, age, and nonexperienced/experienced group.
| Gender | Nonexperienced/experienced group with complete dentures | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | Males | Nonexperienced | Experienced | |
|
| 42 | 46 | 45 | 43 |
|
| 54.6 | 55.7 | 52.7 | 57.8 |
| SD | 5.4 | 6.1 | 5.7 | 4.1 |
|
| 66 | 68 | 65 | 68 |
|
| 42 | 44 | 42 | 49 |
The amplitude dynamics of the planimetric indicators of bioelectric activity of m. masseter (μV) during maximum voluntary tooth compression at the intercuspidal position.
| Measurement | Gender | Experience | Total | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | M | Without | With | |||||||
| DS | NDS | DS | NDS | DS | NDS | DS | NDS | DS | NDS | |
|
| 42 | 42 | 46 | 46 | 45 | 45 | 43 | 43 | 88 | 88 |
| 1x | 418 | 287 | 509 | 511 | 463 | 420 | 467 | 387 | 465 | 404 |
| SD | 21.3 | 14.4 | 27.6 | 18.7 | 28.8 | 27.5 | 22.3 | 19.2 | 18.2 | 16.9 |
| 2x | 502 | 318 | 594 | 512 | 527 | 448 | 573 | 389 | 550 | 419 |
| SD | 34.9 | 14.1 | 17.2 | 15.2 | 28.5 | 20.9 | 26.3 | 19.7 | 19.5 | 14.7 |
| 3x | 634 | 231 | 586 | 449 | 613 | 387 | 605 | 301 | 609 | 345 |
| SD | 19.9 | 12.9 | 17.3 | 19.1 | 19.3 | 23.2 | 18.4 | 21.8 | 13.3 | 16.5 |
| 4x | 514 | 433 | 537 | 428 | 515 | 417 | 537 | 444 | 526 | 430 |
| SD | 23.6 | 21.9 | 27.4 | 14.7 | 28.4 | 16.7 | 22.6 | 19.9 | 18.1 | 13.0 |
| 5x | 511 | 391 | 747 | 588 | 629 | 496 | 639 | 492 | 634 | 496 |
| SD | 25.0 | 24.7 | 32.5 | 21.6 | 36.4 | 26.5 | 32.0 | 28.6 | 24.2 | 19.4 |
| 6x | 607 | 366 | 734 | 535 | 657 | 448 | 690 | 460 | 673 | 454 |
| SD | 25.9 | 20.4 | 27.3 | 20.4 | 29.5 | 25.8 | 26.9 | 22.0 | 20.0 | 16.9 |
Figure 1The amplitude of m. masseter according to gender with complete dentures (dominant side/nondominant side).
Figure 2The amplitude of m. masseter according to experience with complete dentures (dominant side/nondominant side).
The amplitude dynamics of the planimetric indicators of bioelectric activity of m. temporalis during maximum voluntary tooth compression at the intercuspidal position.
| Measurement | Gender | Experience | Total | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | M | Without | With | |||||||
| DS | NDS | DS | NDS | DS | NDS | DS | NDS | DS | NDS | |
|
| 42 | 42 | 46 | 46 | 45 | 45 | 43 | 43 | 88 | 88 |
| 1x | 395 | 342 | 726 | 551 | 612 | 511 | 522 | 389 | 568 | 451 |
| SD | 22.1 | 25.7 | 43.8 | 26.2 | 46.7 | 31.5 | 38.8 | 26.0 | 30.7 | 21.4 |
| 2x | 371 | 264 | 745 | 516 | 609 | 433 | 522 | 356 | 566 | 396 |
| SD | 16.9 | 13.8 | 37.2 | 33.3 | 41.6 | 35.3 | 39.4 | 28.1 | 28.9 | 22.9 |
| 3x | 577 | 374 | 633 | 445 | 641 | 451 | 570 | 369 | 606 | 411 |
| SD | 22.4 | 26.1 | 31.3 | 25.5 | 31.6 | 26.9 | 21.6 | 24.0 | 19.6 | 18.5 |
| 4x | 430 | 366 | 522 | 424 | 496 | 428 | 459 | 363 | 478 | 396 |
| SD | 13.9 | 23.1 | 14.6 | 17.0 | 16.1 | 21.2 | 15.3 | 18.5 | 11.2 | 14.4 |
| 5x | 345 | 348 | 698 | 453 | 539 | 428 | 520 | 377 | 530 | 403 |
| SD | 8.1 | 15.4 | 28.6 | 19.8 | 36.1 | 21.3 | 32.7 | 16.8 | 24.3 | 13.8 |
| 6x | 384 | 354 | 758 | 517 | 596 | 463 | 562 | 415 | 579 | 440 |
| SD | 9.5 | 23.4 | 36.9 | 21.7 | 40.6 | 27.1 | 39.0 | 23.6 | 28.1 | 18.1 |
Figure 3The amplitude of m. temporalis according to gender with complete dentures (dominant side/nondominant side).
Figure 4The amplitude of m. temporalis according to experience with complete dentures (dominant side/nondominant side).
The values of the sum of the surfaces of the planimetric indicators of the bioelectric activity of m. masseter and m. temporalis.
| Measurement | Gender | Experience | Total | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | M | Without | With | |||||||
| DS | NDS | DS | NDS | DS | NDS | DS | NDS | DS | NDS | |
|
| 42 | 42 | 46 | 46 | 45 | 45 | 43 | 43 | 88 | 88 |
| 1x | 65 | 60 | 145 | 103 | 114 | 86 | 100 | 80 | 107 | 83 |
| SD | 3.0 | 2.5 | 6.8 | 4.0 | 9.2 | 5.2 | 6.6 | 4.1 | 5.7 | 3.3 |
| 2x | 136 | 67 | 105 | 153 | 95 | 149 | 78 | 151 | 164 | 87 |
| SD | 4.1 | 2.8 | 6.3 | 4.6 | 6.5 | 5.3 | 4.8 | 3.8 | 4.1 | 3.4 |
| 3x | 191 | 62 | 139 | 81 | 164 | 77 | 165 | 67 | 164 | 72 |
| SD | 6.6 | 2.8 | 4.0 | 3.4 | 6.5 | 3.5 | 6.8 | 3.3 | 4.7 | 2.5 |
| 4x | 132 | 77 | 143 | 100 | 142 | 89 | 134 | 138 | 89 | 100 |
| SD | 4.2 | 2.8 | 6.2 | 5.2 | 6.3 | 4.8 | 4.2 | 4.4 | 3.8 | 3.2 |
| 5x | 127 | 86 | 175 | 110 | 155 | 102 | 149 | 95 | 152 | 99 |
| SD | 4.3 | 3.5 | 5.7 | 5.9 | 7.0 | 5.9 | 5.3 | 4.5 | 4.4 | 3.7 |
| 6x | 157 | 112 | 163 | 104 | 159 | 104 | 161 | 113 | 160 | 108 |
| SD | 5.8 | 6.6 | 5.2 | 5.4 | 5.9 | 5.9 | 5.1 | 6.1 | 3.9 | 4.2 |
Figure 5The values of the sum of the surfaces of the planimetric indicators according to gender with complete dentures (dominant side/nondominant side).
Figure 6The values of the sum of the surfaces of the planimetric indicators according to experience.