| Literature DB >> 29707142 |
Naoko Ishida1, Motoi Baba1, Yutaka Hatanaka2,3, Kanako Hagio1, Hiromi Okada2, Kanako C Hatanaka3, Kenichi Togashi4, Yoshihiro Matsuno2,3, Hiroko Yamashita1.
Abstract
Although endocrine therapy is the most important treatment option in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer, new strategies, such as molecular targeted agents together with endocrine therapy are required to improve survival. PIK3CA is the most frequent mutated gene in ER-positive early breast cancers, and PIK3CA mutation status is reported to affect activation of AKT and ERα. Moreover, recent studies demonstrate that patients had a better prognosis when tumors expressed ER, androgen receptor (AR), and vitamin D receptor (VDR). In this study, we examined expression of AR and VDR, phosphorylation of AKT serine (Ser) 473 (AKT phospho-Ser473) and ERα Ser167 (ERα phospho-Ser167) by immunohistochemistry in ER-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer. PIK3CA gene mutations were also detected in genomic DNA extracted from tumor blocks. Correlations between these biological markers, clinicopathological factors and prognosis were analyzed. Levels of AKT phospho-Ser473 were significantly higher in premenopausal women than in postmenopausal women. In contrast, AR expression was significantly higher in postmenopausal women than in premenopausal women. PIK3CA mutations were detected in 47% in premenopausal women and 47% in postmenopausal women. Postmenopausal women with PIK3CA wild-type tumors had significantly worse disease-free survival than patients with PIK3CA mutant tumors. Low levels of AKT phospho-Ser473 and high levels of ERα phospho-Ser167 were strongly associated with increased disease-free survival in postmenopausal women. Evaluation of ERα activation, in addition to PIK3CA mutation status, might be helpful in identifying patients who are likely to benefit from endocrine therapy alone versus those who are not in postmenopausal ER-positive early breast cancer.Entities:
Keywords: AKT Ser473; ERα Ser167; PIK3CA; breast cancer; estrogen receptor
Year: 2018 PMID: 29707142 PMCID: PMC5915150 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.24845
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Clinicopathological characteristics of patients and tumors in pre- and postmenopausal women
| Premenopausal | Postmenopausal | |
|---|---|---|
| No. of patients | 62 | 152 |
| Age (years), mean ± SD (range) | 44.2 ± 5.5 (27–56) | 63.0 ± 8.2 (42–84) |
| BMI, mean ± SD (range) | 21.8 ± 3.7 (15.2–32.9) | 24.3 ± 4.3 (14.0–40.9) |
| Tumor size | ||
| T1 (≤2.0 cm) | 47 (75.8%) | 102 (67.1%) |
| T2 (2.1–5.0 cm) | 13 (21.0%) | 45 (29.6%) |
| T3 (>5.0 cm) | 2 (3.2%) | 5 (3.3%) |
| No. of positive lymph nodes | ||
| 0 | 42 (67.7%) | 113 (74.3%) |
| 1–3 | 14 (22.6%) | 25 (16.4%) |
| ≥4 | 4 (6.5%) | 9 (5.9%) |
| Unknown | 2 (3.2%) | 5 (3.3%) |
| Tumor grade | ||
| 1 | 18 (29.0%) | 32 (21.1%) |
| 2 | 37 (59.7%) | 107 (70.4%) |
| 3 | 7 (11.3%) | 13 (8.6%) |
| Ki67 LI | ||
| <14% | 40 (64.5%) | 101 (66.4%) |
| 14–30% | 15 (24.2%) | 41 (27.0%) |
| >30% | 7 (11.3%) | 10 (6.6%) |
| Postoperative adjuvant therapy | ||
| None | 4 (6.5%) | 7 (4.6%) |
| Any endocrine therapy | 58 (93.5%) | 145 (95.4%) |
| Tamoxifen alone | 21 (36.2%) | 8 (5.5%) |
| Tamoxifen + LHRH agonist | 25 (43.1%) | 0 |
| LHRH agonist alone | 6 (10.3%) | 0 |
| Tamoxifen + LHRH agonist → AI | 1 (1.7%) | 0 |
| Tamoxifen → AI | 1 (1.7%) | 1 (0.7%) |
| AI | 4 (6.9%) | 135 (93.1%) |
| AI → Tamoxifen | 0 | 1 (0.7%) |
| Combined endocrine and chemotherapy | 16 (25.8%) | 28 (18.4%) |
| Follow-up (months), mean ± SD (range) | 76.7 ± 38.3 (6–128) | 77.7 ± 30.6 (6–129) |
LI: labeling index; LHRH agonist: luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist; AI: aromatase inhibitor.
List of antibodies used for immunohistochemical analysis
| Antibody | Species (dilution) | 2nd antibody | Evaluation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ER | SP1, Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, USA | rabbit monoclonal | Ventana iVIEW DAB Detection Kit | percentage of cells showing positive nuclear staining |
| PgR | 1E2, Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, USA | rabbit monoclonal | Ventana iVIEW DAB Detection Kit | percentage of cells showing positive nuclear staining |
| HER2 | 4B5, Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, USA | rabbit monoclonal | Ventana iVIEW DAB Detection Kit | 0, 1+, 2+, 3+ |
| Ki67 | MIB-1, DAKO, | mouse monoclonal | Dako EnVison FLEX system | labeling index |
| AR | AR27, Novocastra, | mouse monoclonal | Dako EnVison FLEX system | percentage of cells showing positive nuclear staining |
| VDR | NBP1-19478, Novus, | rabbit polyclonal | Dako EnVison FLEX system | percentage of cells showing positive nuclear staining |
| AKT phospho-Ser473 (pAKT) | D9E, Cell Signaling, | rabbit monoclonal | Dako EnVison FLEX system | percentage of cells and intensity showing positive cytoplasmic staining |
| ERα phospho-Ser167 (pER) | GTX50140, GeneTex, | rabbit polyclonal | Dako EnVison FLEX system | percentage of cells showing positive nuclear staining |
Figure 1Representative immunohistochemical staining of AR, VDR, AKT Ser473 and ERα Ser167 in invasive ductal carcinoma
Positive nuclear staining of AR (A), VDR (B) and ERα phospho-Ser167 (D), and positive cytoplasmic staining of AKT phospho-Ser473 (C) are seen in carcinoma cells.
Comparison of expression and phosphorylation levels of biological markers between pre- and postmenopausal women
| Premenopausal (mean ± SD) | Postmenopausal (mean ± SD) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ki67 LI (%) | 14.1 ± 13.1 | 11.9 ± 9.7 | 0.43 |
| ER (%) | 76.6 ± 25.0 | 81.3 ± 22.1 | 0.19 |
| PgR (%) | 63.5 ± 36.1 | 30.2 ± 32.1 | <0.001* |
| AR (%) | 21.9 ± 25.3 | 38.5 ± 31.6 | <0.001* |
| VDR (%) | 15.3 ± 17.7 | 16.8 ± 14.9 | 0.29 |
| pAKT (score) | 127.3 ± 86.8 | 94.1 ± 75.1 | 0.014* |
| pER (%) | 24.1 ± 20.9 | 20.9 ± 18.7 | 0.27 |
LI: labeling index; pAKT: AKT phospho-Ser473; pER: ERα phospho-Ser167.
*P < 0.05 is considered significant.
PIK3CA mutation frequencies in breast cancer tissues in pre- and postmenopausal women
| Premenopausal | Postmenopausal | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of patients | 62 | 152 | |||
| Wild-type | 31 (50.0%) | 73 (48.0%) | |||
| Mutant | 29 (46.8%) | 71 (46.7%) | |||
| Invalid | 2 (3.2%) | 8 (5.3%) | |||
| Exon | Nucleotide change | Amino acid mutation | |||
| Single mutation | 26 (43.3%) | 64 (44.4%) | |||
| p85-regulatory | 1 | 263 G>A | R88Q | 0 | 0 |
| C2 | 4 | 1035 T>A | N345K | 2 (3.3%) | 6 (4.2%) |
| 7 | 1258 T>C | C420R | 1 (1.7%) | 2 (1.4%) | |
| Helical | 9 | 1624 G>A | E542K | 2 (3.3%) | 1 (0.7%) |
| 9 | 1634 A>Ca), 1635 G>Tb), | E545X | 4 (6.7%) | 15 (10.4%) | |
| 9 | 1636 C>Ge), 1636 C>Af), 1637 A>Tg), or | Q546X | 0 | 1 (0.7%) | |
| Kinase | 20 | 3129 G>T | M1043I | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 3140 A>Ti), 3140 A>Gj), or 3139 C>Tk) | H1047X | 17 (28.3%) | 38 (26.4%) | |
| 20 | 3145 G>C | G1049R | 0 | 1 (0.7%) | |
| Double mutations | 3 (5.0%) | 6 (4.2%) | |||
| C2 and kinase | N345K, H1047X | 0 | 1 (0.7%) | ||
| Helical and kinase | E542K, H1047X | 1 (1.7%) | 2 (1.4%) | ||
| E545X, G1047X | 1 (1.7%) | 2 (1.4%) | |||
| E545X, G1049R | 0 | 1 (0.7%) | |||
| Q546X, H1047X | 1 (1.7%) | 0 | |||
| Triple mutations | 0 | 1 (0.7%) | |||
| Helical and kinase | E542K, Q546X, H1047X | 0 | 1 (0.7%) | ||
Correlation between PIK3CA mutation status and clinicopathological factors in pre- and postmenopausal women
| Premenopausal | Postmenopausal | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wild-type | Mutant | Wild-type | Mutant | |||
| Age (years), | 43.2 ± 5.9 | 45.4 ± 5.1 | 0.17 | 62.0 ± 8.2 | 63.8 ± 8.2 | 0.18 |
| BMI, | 21.8 ± 4.1 | 21.8 ± 3.4 | 0.63 | 24.6 ± 4.4 | 23.8 ± 4.1 | 0.38 |
| Tumor size (T), | 1 (1–2) | 1 (1–3) | 0.56 | 1 (1–3) | 1 (1–3) | 0.34 |
| No. of positive lymph nodes, | 0 (0–23) | 0 (0–20) | 0.30 | 0 (0–10) | 0 (0–10) | 0.90 |
| Tumor grade, | 2 (1–3) | 2 (1–3) | 0.041* | 2 (1–3) | 2 (1–3) | 0.051 |
| Ki67 LI (%), | 10.1 | 12.2 | 0.46 | 10.3 | 7.5 | 0.03* |
| ER (%), | 90 | 80 | 0.025* | 90 | 90 | 0.40 |
| PgR (%), | 90 | 80 | 0.44 | 10 | 20 | 0.37 |
| AR (%), | 1.0 | 20 | 0.047* | 30 | 35 | 0.065 |
| VDR (%), | 10 | 10 | 0.91 | 10 | 20 | 0.13 |
| pAKT (score), | 120 | 100 | 0.14 | 100 | 70 | 0.0049* |
| pER (%), | 20 | 20 | 0.74 | 15 | 20 | 0.018* |
LI: labeling index; pAKT: AKT phospho-Ser473; pER: ERα phospho-Ser167.
*P < 0.05 is considered significant.
Figure 2Kaplan–Meier curves of the effect of PIK3CA mutations, phosphorylation of AKT Ser473 and ERα Ser167 on disease-free survival in postmenopausal women
Disease-free survival according to PIK3CA mutations (A), phosphorylation of AKT Ser473 (B), and phosphorylation of ERα Ser167 (C).
Univariate and multivariate analysis of factors predicting disease-free survival in postmenopausal women
| Factor | Univariate | Multivariate | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RRa | 95% CIb | RRa | 95% CIb | |||
| BMI | 1.02 | 0.91–1.15 | 0.68 | |||
| Tumor size | 2.3 | 1.00–5.27 | 0.05 | |||
| Lymph node status | 1.65 | 1.01–2.69 | 0.04* | 1.46 | 1.10–1.93 | 0.008* |
| Tumor grade | 3.3 | 1.31–8.34 | 0.01* | 1.13 | 0.33–3.95 | 0.84 |
| Ki67 LI | 1.07 | 1.03–1.11 | <0.001* | 1.05 | 1.02–1.12 | 0.005* |
| ER | 1.01 | 0.99–1.04 | 0.40 | |||
| PgR | 0.98 | 0.96–1.00 | 0.05 | |||
| AR | 1.00 | 0.98–1.01 | 0.71 | |||
| VDR | 1.00 | 0.95–1.02 | 0.53 | |||
| pAKT (<170, 170≥) | 3.17 | 1.18–8.54 | 0.02* | 0.27 | 0.07–1.01 | 0.05 |
| pER (<15%, 15%≥) | 0.27 | 0.09–0.79 | 0.02* | 2.49 | 0.73–8.51 | 0.14 |
| 0.21 | 0.06–0.73 | 0.02* | 0.14 | 0.03–0.76 | 0.02* | |
| Adjuvant chemotherapy | 0.77 | 0.10–5.84 | 0.80 | |||
| Adjuvant endocrine therapy | 1.5 | 0.48–4.66 | 0.48 | |||
LI: labeling index; pAKT: AKT phospho-Ser473; pER: ERα phospho-Ser167.
aRelative risk.
bConfidence interval.
*P < 0.05 is considered significant.
Correlation between combined PIK3CA-pAKT-pER status and clinicopathological factors and prognosis in postmenopausal women
| Type | Type A | Type B | Type C | Type D | Type E | Type F | Type G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pAKT | high | high | low | low | high | low | low |
| pER | low | high | low | high | low/high | low | high |
| No. of patients | 8 (11%) | 13 (18%) | 26 (36%) | 26 (36%) | 9 (13%) | 21 (30%) | 41 (58%) |
| Age (years), mean ± SD (range) | 63.8 ± 8.0 | 59.4 ± 6.6 | 62.3 ± 9.4 | 62.4 ± 7.8 | 57.2 ± 6.8d | 64.4 ± 5.9 | 65.0 ± 9.0d |
| BMI, mean ± SD | 23.4 ± 4.2 | 23.2 ± 2.4 | 26.1 ± 4.1 | 24.0 ± 5.3 | 21.5 ± 3.0 | 25.3 ± 4.2 | 23.6 ± 4.1 |
| Tumor size (T), | 2 (1–3) | 1 (1–2) | 2 (1–3) | 1 (1–2) | 1 (1–3) | 1 (1–3)e | 1 (1–2)e |
| No. of positive lymph nodes, | 1 (0–6) | 0 (0–1) | 0 (0–4) | 0 (0–10) | 0 (0–1) | 0 (0–10) | 0 (0–7) |
| Tumor grade, | 3 (2–3)a | 2 (1–2)a | 2 (1–3) | 2 (1–3) | 2 (1–2) | 2 (1–3) | 2 (1–3) |
| Ki67 LI (%), | 18.8 | 19.5 | 9.1 | 11.0 | 5.5 | 11.5 | 7.0 |
| ER (%), | 90 | 90 | 80 | 90 | 60 | 90 | 90 |
| PgR (%), | 20 | 5 | 30 | 10 | 5 | 20 | 20 |
| AR (%), mean ± SD (range) | 31.3 ± 25.7 | 42.5 ± 32.6 | 23.4 ± 21.8 | 38.3 ± 32.5 | 45.2 ± 39.6 | 29.8 ± 28.0g | 50.2 ± 34.0g |
| VDR (%), | 7.5 | 20 | 5 | 15 | 20 | 25 | 15 |
| No. of patients with recurrence | |||||||
| within 2 years | 3 (38%) | 0 | 2 (8%) | 0 | 0 | 1 (5%) | 0 |
| within 5 years | 4 (50%) | 2 (15%) | 3 (12%) | 0 | 0 | 2 (10%) | 0 |
| within 10 years | 4 (50%) | 3 (23%) | 4 (15%) | 2 (8%) | 0 | 3 (14%) | 0 |
LI: labeling index; pAKT: AKT phospho-Ser473; pER: ERα phospho-Ser167.
aP = 0.0083 by Steel’s test.
bP = 0.047 by Steel’s test.
cP = 0.032 by Steel’s test.
dP = 0.0095 by Dunnett’s test.
eP = 0.0094 by Steel’s test.
fP = 0.023 by Steel’s test.
gP = 0.024 by Dunnett’s test.
Figure 3Kaplan–Meir curves of the effect of phosphorylation of AKT Ser473 and ERα Ser167 by PIK3CA mutation status on disease-free survival in postmenopausal women
(A) Disease-free survival according to phosphorylation status of AKT Ser473 and ERα Ser167 in PIK3CA wild-type tumors. (B) Disease-free survival according to phosphorylation status of AKT Ser473 and ERα Ser167 in PIK3CA mutant tumors.