José Baselga1, Seock-Ah Im2, Hiroji Iwata3, Javier Cortés4, Michele De Laurentiis5, Zefei Jiang6, Carlos L Arteaga7, Walter Jonat8, Mark Clemons9, Yoshinori Ito10, Ahmad Awada11, Stephen Chia12, Agnieszka Jagiełło-Gruszfeld13, Barbara Pistilli14, Ling-Ming Tseng15, Sara Hurvitz16, Norikazu Masuda17, Masato Takahashi18, Peter Vuylsteke19, Soulef Hachemi20, Bharani Dharan21, Emmanuelle Di Tomaso22, Patrick Urban23, Cristian Massacesi20, Mario Campone24. 1. Department of Medicine and Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: baselgaj@mskcc.org. 2. Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. 3. Department of Breast Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan. 4. Department of Medical Oncology, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Instituto Oncológico Baselga, Hospital Quirónsalud, Barcelona, Spain. 5. Department of Breast Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumouri Fondazione G Pascale, Naples, Italy. 6. Department of Breast Cancer, Beijing 307 Hospital of PLA, Beijing, China. 7. Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA. 8. Department of Gynecology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany. 9. Division of Medical Oncology, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada. 10. Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan. 11. Medicine Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium. 12. Department of Medicine, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada. 13. Department of Breast Cancer and Reconstruction Surgery, Maria Skłodowska Curie Memorial Cancer Centre and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland. 14. Department of Oncology, Ospedale di Macerata, Macerata, Italy. 15. Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan. 16. Division of Haematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 17. Breast Oncology, Department of Surgery, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan. 18. Department of Breast Surgery, National Hospital Organization Hokkaido Cancer Center, Sapporo, Japan. 19. Department of Medical Oncology, Université Catholique de Louvain, CHU UCL, Namur, Belgium. 20. Novartis Pharma SAS, Paris, France. 21. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA. 22. Syros Pharmaceuticals, Watertown, MA, USA. 23. Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland. 24. Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest-René Gauducheau Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie, Nantes, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway activation is a hallmark of endocrine therapy-resistant, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. This phase 3 study assessed the efficacy of the pan-PI3K inhibitor buparlisib plus fulvestrant in patients with advanced breast cancer, including an evaluation of the PI3K pathway activation status as a biomarker for clinical benefit. METHODS: The BELLE-2 trial was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study. Postmenopausal women aged 18 years or older with histologically confirmed, hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor (HER2)-negative inoperable locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer whose disease had progressed on or after aromatase inhibitor treatment and had received up to one previous line of chemotherapy for advanced disease were included. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using interactive voice response technology (block size of 6) on day 15 of cycle 1 to receive oral buparlisib (100 mg/day) or matching placebo, starting on day 15 of cycle 1, plus intramuscular fulvestrant (500 mg) on days 1 and 15 of cycle 1, and on day 1 of subsequent 28-day cycles. Patients were assigned randomisation numbers with a validated interactive response technology; these numbers were linked to different treatment groups which in turn were linked to treatment numbers. PI3K status in tumour tissue was determined via central laboratory during a 14-day run-in phase. Randomisation was stratified by PI3K pathway activation status (activated vs non-activated vs and unknown) and visceral disease status (present vs absent). Patients, investigators, local radiologists, study team, and anyone involved in the study were masked to the identity of the treatment until unblinding. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival by local investigator assessment per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (version 1.1) in the total population, in patients with known (activated or non-activated) PI3K pathway status, and in PI3K pathway-activated patients. Efficacy analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment according to the treatment they received. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01610284, and is currently ongoing but not recruiting participants. FINDINGS: Between Sept 7, 2012, and Sept 10, 2014, 1147 patients from 267 centres in 29 countries were randomly assigned to receive buparlisib (n=576) or placebo plus fulvestrant (n=571). In the total patient population (n=1147), median progression-free survival was 6·9 months (95% CI 6·8-7·8) in the buparlisib group versus 5·0 months (4·0-5·2) in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·78 [95% CI 0·67-0·89]; one-sided p=0·00021). In patients with known PI3K status (n=851), median progression-free survival was 6·8 months (95% CI 5·0-7·0) in the buparlisib group vs 4·5 months (3·3-5·0) in the placebo group (HR 0·80 [95% CI 0·68-0·94]; one-sided p=0·0033). In PI3K pathway-activated patients (n=372), median progression-free survival was 6·8 months (95% CI 4·9-7·1) in the buparlisib group versus 4·0 months (3·1-5·2) in the placebo group (HR 0·76 [0·60-0·97], one-sided p=0·014). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events in the buparlisib group versus the placebo group were increased alanine aminotransferase (146 [25%] of 573 patients vs six [1%] of 570), increased aspartate aminotransferase (103 [18%] vs 16 [3%]), hyperglycaemia (88 [15%] vs one [<1%]), and rash (45 [8%] vs none). Serious adverse events were reported in 134 (23%) of 573 patients in the buparlisib group compared with 90 [16%] of 570 patients in the placebo group; the most common serious adverse events (affecting ≥2% of patients) were increased alanine aminotransferase (17 [3%] of 573 vs one [<1%] of 570) and increased aspartate aminotransferase (14 [2%] vs one [<1%]). No treatment-related deaths occurred. INTERPRETATION: The results from this study show that PI3K inhibition combined with endocrine therapy is effective in postmenopausal women with endocrine-resistant, hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Use of more selective PI3K inhibitors, such as α-specific PI3K inhibitor, is warranted to further improve safety and benefit in this setting. No further studies are being pursued because of the toxicity associated with this combination. FUNDING: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway activation is a hallmark of endocrine therapy-resistant, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. This phase 3 study assessed the efficacy of the pan-PI3K inhibitor buparlisib plus fulvestrant in patients with advanced breast cancer, including an evaluation of the PI3K pathway activation status as a biomarker for clinical benefit. METHODS: The BELLE-2 trial was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study. Postmenopausal women aged 18 years or older with histologically confirmed, hormone receptor-positive and humanepidermal growth factor (HER2)-negative inoperable locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer whose disease had progressed on or after aromatase inhibitor treatment and had received up to one previous line of chemotherapy for advanced disease were included. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using interactive voice response technology (block size of 6) on day 15 of cycle 1 to receive oral buparlisib (100 mg/day) or matching placebo, starting on day 15 of cycle 1, plus intramuscular fulvestrant (500 mg) on days 1 and 15 of cycle 1, and on day 1 of subsequent 28-day cycles. Patients were assigned randomisation numbers with a validated interactive response technology; these numbers were linked to different treatment groups which in turn were linked to treatment numbers. PI3K status in tumour tissue was determined via central laboratory during a 14-day run-in phase. Randomisation was stratified by PI3K pathway activation status (activated vs non-activated vs and unknown) and visceral disease status (present vs absent). Patients, investigators, local radiologists, study team, and anyone involved in the study were masked to the identity of the treatment until unblinding. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival by local investigator assessment per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (version 1.1) in the total population, in patients with known (activated or non-activated) PI3K pathway status, and in PI3K pathway-activated patients. Efficacy analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment according to the treatment they received. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01610284, and is currently ongoing but not recruiting participants. FINDINGS: Between Sept 7, 2012, and Sept 10, 2014, 1147 patients from 267 centres in 29 countries were randomly assigned to receive buparlisib (n=576) or placebo plus fulvestrant (n=571). In the total patient population (n=1147), median progression-free survival was 6·9 months (95% CI 6·8-7·8) in the buparlisib group versus 5·0 months (4·0-5·2) in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·78 [95% CI 0·67-0·89]; one-sided p=0·00021). In patients with known PI3K status (n=851), median progression-free survival was 6·8 months (95% CI 5·0-7·0) in the buparlisib group vs 4·5 months (3·3-5·0) in the placebo group (HR 0·80 [95% CI 0·68-0·94]; one-sided p=0·0033). In PI3K pathway-activated patients (n=372), median progression-free survival was 6·8 months (95% CI 4·9-7·1) in the buparlisib group versus 4·0 months (3·1-5·2) in the placebo group (HR 0·76 [0·60-0·97], one-sided p=0·014). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events in the buparlisib group versus the placebo group were increased alanine aminotransferase (146 [25%] of 573 patients vs six [1%] of 570), increased aspartate aminotransferase (103 [18%] vs 16 [3%]), hyperglycaemia (88 [15%] vs one [<1%]), and rash (45 [8%] vs none). Serious adverse events were reported in 134 (23%) of 573 patients in the buparlisib group compared with 90 [16%] of 570 patients in the placebo group; the most common serious adverse events (affecting ≥2% of patients) were increased alanine aminotransferase (17 [3%] of 573 vs one [<1%] of 570) and increased aspartate aminotransferase (14 [2%] vs one [<1%]). No treatment-related deaths occurred. INTERPRETATION: The results from this study show that PI3K inhibition combined with endocrine therapy is effective in postmenopausal women with endocrine-resistant, hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Use of more selective PI3K inhibitors, such as α-specific PI3K inhibitor, is warranted to further improve safety and benefit in this setting. No further studies are being pursued because of the toxicity associated with this combination. FUNDING: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.
Authors: José Baselga; Mario Campone; Martine Piccart; Howard A Burris; Hope S Rugo; Tarek Sahmoud; Shinzaburo Noguchi; Michael Gnant; Kathleen I Pritchard; Fabienne Lebrun; J Thaddeus Beck; Yoshinori Ito; Denise Yardley; Ines Deleu; Alejandra Perez; Thomas Bachelot; Luc Vittori; Zhiying Xu; Pabak Mukhopadhyay; David Lebwohl; Gabriel N Hortobagyi Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-12-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Todd W Miller; Bryan T Hennessy; Ana M González-Angulo; Emily M Fox; Gordon B Mills; Heidi Chen; Catherine Higham; Carlos García-Echeverría; Yu Shyr; Carlos L Arteaga Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2010-06-07 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Ana Bosch; Zhiqiang Li; Anna Bergamaschi; Haley Ellis; Eneda Toska; Aleix Prat; Jessica J Tao; Daniel E Spratt; Nerissa T Viola-Villegas; Pau Castel; Gerard Minuesa; Natasha Morse; Jordi Rodón; Yasir Ibrahim; Javier Cortes; Jose Perez-Garcia; Patricia Galvan; Judit Grueso; Marta Guzman; John A Katzenellenbogen; Michael Kharas; Jason S Lewis; Maura Dickler; Violeta Serra; Neal Rosen; Sarat Chandarlapaty; Maurizio Scaltriti; José Baselga Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2015-04-15 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: C M Perou; T Sørlie; M B Eisen; M van de Rijn; S S Jeffrey; C A Rees; J R Pollack; D T Ross; H Johnsen; L A Akslen; O Fluge; A Pergamenschikov; C Williams; S X Zhu; P E Lønning; A L Børresen-Dale; P O Brown; D Botstein Journal: Nature Date: 2000-08-17 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Chetan Bettegowda; Mark Sausen; Rebecca J Leary; Isaac Kinde; Yuxuan Wang; Nishant Agrawal; Bjarne R Bartlett; Hao Wang; Brandon Luber; Rhoda M Alani; Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Nilofer S Azad; Alberto Bardelli; Henry Brem; John L Cameron; Clarence C Lee; Leslie A Fecher; Gary L Gallia; Peter Gibbs; Dung Le; Robert L Giuntoli; Michael Goggins; Michael D Hogarty; Matthias Holdhoff; Seung-Mo Hong; Yuchen Jiao; Hartmut H Juhl; Jenny J Kim; Giulia Siravegna; Daniel A Laheru; Calogero Lauricella; Michael Lim; Evan J Lipson; Suely Kazue Nagahashi Marie; George J Netto; Kelly S Oliner; Alessandro Olivi; Louise Olsson; Gregory J Riggins; Andrea Sartore-Bianchi; Kerstin Schmidt; le-Ming Shih; Sueli Mieko Oba-Shinjo; Salvatore Siena; Dan Theodorescu; Jeanne Tie; Timothy T Harkins; Silvio Veronese; Tian-Li Wang; Jon D Weingart; Christopher L Wolfgang; Laura D Wood; Dongmei Xing; Ralph H Hruban; Jian Wu; Peter J Allen; C Max Schmidt; Michael A Choti; Victor E Velculescu; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Nickolas Papadopoulos; Luis A Diaz Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2014-02-19 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Stephen Chia; William Gradishar; Louis Mauriac; Jose Bines; Frederic Amant; Miriam Federico; Luis Fein; Gilles Romieu; Aman Buzdar; John F R Robertson; Adam Brufsky; Kurt Possinger; Pamela Rennie; Francisco Sapunar; Elizabeth Lowe; Martine Piccart Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-03-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Nicholas McGranahan; Francesco Favero; Elza C de Bruin; Nicolai Juul Birkbak; Zoltan Szallasi; Charles Swanton Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2015-04-15 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Debashis Sarker; Joo Ern Ang; Richard Baird; Rebecca Kristeleit; Krunal Shah; Victor Moreno; Paul A Clarke; Florence I Raynaud; Gallia Levy; Joseph A Ware; Kathryn Mazina; Ray Lin; Jenny Wu; Jill Fredrickson; Jill M Spoerke; Mark R Lackner; Yibing Yan; Lori S Friedman; Stan B Kaye; Mika K Derynck; Paul Workman; Johann S de Bono Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2014-11-04 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: F Cardoso; A Costa; L Norton; E Senkus; M Aapro; F André; C H Barrios; J Bergh; L Biganzoli; K L Blackwell; M J Cardoso; T Cufer; N El Saghir; L Fallowfield; D Fenech; P Francis; K Gelmon; S H Giordano; J Gligorov; A Goldhirsch; N Harbeck; N Houssami; C Hudis; B Kaufman; I Krop; S Kyriakides; U N Lin; M Mayer; S D Merjaver; E B Nordström; O Pagani; A Partridge; F Penault-Llorca; M J Piccart; H Rugo; G Sledge; C Thomssen; L Van't Veer; D Vorobiof; C Vrieling; N West; B Xu; E Winer Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2014-09-18 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Jill M Spoerke; Steven Gendreau; Kimberly Walter; Jiaheng Qiu; Timothy R Wilson; Heidi Savage; Junko Aimi; Mika K Derynck; Meng Chen; Iris T Chan; Lukas C Amler; Garret M Hampton; Stephen Johnston; Ian Krop; Peter Schmid; Mark R Lackner Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2016-05-13 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Shuying Liu; Shunqiang Li; Bailiang Wang; Wenbin Liu; Mihai Gagea; Huiqin Chen; Joohyuk Sohn; Napa Parinyanitikul; Tina Primeau; Kim-Anh Do; George F Vande Woude; John Mendelsohn; Naoto T Ueno; Gordon B Mills; Debu Tripathy; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2018-12-05 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Dejan Juric; Jordi Rodon; Josep Tabernero; Filip Janku; Howard A Burris; Jan H M Schellens; Mark R Middleton; Jordan Berlin; Martin Schuler; Marta Gil-Martin; Hope S Rugo; Ruth Seggewiss-Bernhardt; Alan Huang; Douglas Bootle; David Demanse; Lars Blumenstein; Christina Coughlin; Cornelia Quadt; José Baselga Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-02-05 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Maura N Dickler; Cristina Saura; Donald A Richards; Ian E Krop; Andrés Cervantes; Philippe L Bedard; Manish R Patel; Lajos Pusztai; Mafalda Oliveira; Alison K Cardenas; Na Cui; Timothy R Wilson; Thomas J Stout; Michael C Wei; Jerry Y Hsu; José Baselga Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-05-23 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: David A Fruman; Honyin Chiu; Benjamin D Hopkins; Shubha Bagrodia; Lewis C Cantley; Robert T Abraham Journal: Cell Date: 2017-08-10 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Patrick Y Wen; Mehdi Touat; Brian M Alexander; Ingo K Mellinghoff; Shakti Ramkissoon; Christine S McCluskey; Kristine Pelton; Sam Haidar; Sankha S Basu; Sarah C Gaffey; Loreal E Brown; Juan Emmanuel Martinez-Ledesma; Shaofang Wu; Jungwoo Kim; Wei Wei; Mi-Ae Park; Jason T Huse; John G Kuhn; Mikael L Rinne; Howard Colman; Nathalie Y R Agar; Antonio M Omuro; Lisa M DeAngelis; Mark R Gilbert; John F de Groot; Timothy F Cloughesy; Andrew S Chi; Thomas M Roberts; Jean J Zhao; Eudocia Q Lee; Lakshmi Nayak; James R Heath; Laura L Horky; Tracy T Batchelor; Rameen Beroukhim; Susan M Chang; Azra H Ligon; Ian F Dunn; Dimpy Koul; Geoffrey S Young; Michael D Prados; David A Reardon; W K Alfred Yung; Keith L Ligon Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2019-02-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Pedram Razavi; Jared L Johnson; Hong Shao; Neil Vasan; Hardik Shah; Alesia Antoine; Erik Ladewig; Alexander Gorelick; Ting-Yu Lin; Eneda Toska; Guotai Xu; Abiha Kazmi; Matthew T Chang; Barry S Taylor; Maura N Dickler; Komal Jhaveri; Sarat Chandarlapaty; Raul Rabadan; Ed Reznik; Melissa L Smith; Robert Sebra; Frauke Schimmoller; Timothy R Wilson; Lori S Friedman; Lewis C Cantley; Maurizio Scaltriti; José Baselga Journal: Science Date: 2019-11-08 Impact factor: 47.728