PURPOSE: To examine the androgen receptor (AR) levels in breast cancer and to assess the impact of AR expression on patient outcomes. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Reverse-phase protein arrays were used to measure AR levels and a mass spectroscopy-based approach was used to detect PIK3CA mutations. Means and SDs were generated for AR levels. Linear regression models were used to determine if AR levels differed by tumor subtype and PIK3CA mutation status. Two-sample t tests were used to identify pair-wise differences. Survival probabilities were estimated with the use of the Kaplan-Meier product and log-rank test. RESULTS: The median age was 59 years (23-89 years). Significant differences in AR levels existed among different breast tumor subtypes (highest in estrogen receptor-positive and/or progesterone receptor-positive tumors) as well as by PIK3CA mutation status (P < 0.0001 for both). AR levels were significantly higher in breast tumors with kinase domain PIK3CA mutations versus tumors that are wild type or with PIK3CA helical mutations (P = 0.017 and P < 0.0001, respectively). In 347 patients, dichotomized AR level by the median was a significant prognostic factor of recurrence-free survival (P = 0.0002) and overall survival (P = 0.004). High AR levels were associated with a significantly improved recurrence-free survival in 207 patients with early-stage estrogen/progesterone receptor-positive tumors after adjuvant hormonal therapy. A trend (P = 0.07) was found toward higher AR expression in PIK3CA mutant versus PIK3CA wild-type triple-negative breast tumors. CONCLUSIONS: AR levels may represent a prognostic marker in breast cancers and may provide a valuable tool for selecting treatment. There was an association of PIK3CA mutation (kinase domain) with increased AR levels.
PURPOSE: To examine the androgen receptor (AR) levels in breast cancer and to assess the impact of AR expression on patient outcomes. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Reverse-phase protein arrays were used to measure AR levels and a mass spectroscopy-based approach was used to detect PIK3CA mutations. Means and SDs were generated for AR levels. Linear regression models were used to determine if AR levels differed by tumor subtype and PIK3CA mutation status. Two-sample t tests were used to identify pair-wise differences. Survival probabilities were estimated with the use of the Kaplan-Meier product and log-rank test. RESULTS: The median age was 59 years (23-89 years). Significant differences in AR levels existed among different breast tumor subtypes (highest in estrogen receptor-positive and/or progesterone receptor-positive tumors) as well as by PIK3CA mutation status (P < 0.0001 for both). AR levels were significantly higher in breast tumors with kinase domain PIK3CA mutations versus tumors that are wild type or with PIK3CA helical mutations (P = 0.017 and P < 0.0001, respectively). In 347 patients, dichotomized AR level by the median was a significant prognostic factor of recurrence-free survival (P = 0.0002) and overall survival (P = 0.004). High AR levels were associated with a significantly improved recurrence-free survival in 207 patients with early-stage estrogen/progesterone receptor-positive tumors after adjuvant hormonal therapy. A trend (P = 0.07) was found toward higher AR expression in PIK3CA mutant versus PIK3CA wild-type triple-negative breast tumors. CONCLUSIONS:AR levels may represent a prognostic marker in breast cancers and may provide a valuable tool for selecting treatment. There was an association of PIK3CA mutation (kinase domain) with increased AR levels.
Authors: Brian D Lehmann; Joshua A Bauer; Xi Chen; Melinda E Sanders; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Yu Shyr; Jennifer A Pietenpol Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Tracy Proverbs-Singh; Jarett L Feldman; Michael J Morris; Karen A Autio; Tiffany A Traina Journal: Endocr Relat Cancer Date: 2015-02-26 Impact factor: 5.678
Authors: Pablo Vivas-Mejia; Juliana Maria Benito; Ariel Fernandez; Hee-Dong Han; Lingegowda Mangala; Cristian Rodriguez-Aguayo; Arturo Chavez-Reyes; Yvonne G Lin; Mark S Carey; Alpa M Nick; Rebecca L Stone; Hye Sun Kim; Francois-Xavier Claret; William Bornmann; Bryan T J Hennessy; Angela Sanguino; Zhengong Peng; Anil K Sood; Gabriel Lopez-Berestein Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-12-22 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Nadire Duru; Ming Fan; Demet Candas; Cheikh Menaa; Hsin-Chen Liu; Danupon Nantajit; Yunfei Wen; Kai Xiao; Angela Eldridge; Brett A Chromy; Shiyong Li; Douglas R Spitz; Kit S Lam; Max S Wicha; Jian Jian Li Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-10-22 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Huan Pang; Rory Flinn; Antonia Patsialou; Jeffrey Wyckoff; Evanthia T Roussos; Haiyan Wu; Maria Pozzuto; Sumanta Goswami; John S Condeelis; Anne R Bresnick; Jeffrey E Segall; Jonathan M Backer Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2009-11-10 Impact factor: 12.701