Literature DB >> 29705968

Performance validation of an amplicon-based targeted next-generation sequencing assay and mutation profiling of 648 Chinese colorectal cancer patients.

Yajian Wang1,2, Haijing Liu3, Yingyong Hou4, Xiaoyan Zhou5, Li Liang6, Zhihong Zhang7, Huaiyin Shi8, Sanpeng Xu9, Peizhen Hu10, Zuyu Zheng11, Rui Liu11, Tingdong Tang11, Feng Ye12,13, Zhiyong Liang14, Hong Bu1,2,15.   

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has become a promising approach for tumor somatic mutation detection. However, stringent validation is required for its application on clinical specimens, especially for low-quality formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues. Here, we validated the performance of an amplicon-based targeted NGS assay, OncoAim™ DNA panel, on both commercial reference FFPE samples and clinical FFPE samples of Chinese colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Then we profiled the mutation spectrum of 648 Chinese CRC patients in a multicenter study to explore its clinical utility. This NGS assay achieved 100% test specificity and 95-100% test sensitivity for variants with mutant allele frequency (MAF) ≥ 5% when median read depth ≥ 500×. The orthogonal methods including amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS)-PCR and Sanger sequencing validated that NGS generated three false negatives (FNs) but no false positives (FPs) among 516 clinical samples for KRAS aberration detection. Genomic profiling of Chinese CRC patients with this assay revealed that 63.3% of the tumors harbored clinically actionable alterations. Besides the commonly mutated genes including TP53 (52.82%), KRAS (46.68%), APC (24.09%), PIK3CA (18.94%), SMAD4 (9.47%), BRAF (6.15%), FBXW7 (5.32%), and NRAS (4.15%), other less frequently mutated genes were also identified. Statistically significant association of specific mutated genes with certain clinicopathological features was detected, e.g., both BRAF and PIK3CA were more prevalent in right-side CRC (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). We concluded this targeted NGS assay is qualified for clinical practice, and our findings could help the diagnosis and prognosis of Chinese CRC patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Actionable variants; Colorectal cancer (CRC); Molecular test validation; Next-generation sequencing (NGS)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29705968     DOI: 10.1007/s00428-018-2359-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virchows Arch        ISSN: 0945-6317            Impact factor:   4.064


  40 in total

Review 1.  Effect of fixatives and tissue processing on the content and integrity of nucleic acids.

Authors:  Mythily Srinivasan; Daniel Sedmak; Scott Jewell
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.307

2.  Mutations in the RAS and PI3K pathways are associated with metastatic location in colorectal cancers.

Authors:  Yuan-Tzu Lan; Lin Jen-Kou; Chien-Hsing Lin; Shung-Haur Yang; Chun-Chi Lin; Huann-Sheng Wang; Wei-Shone Chen; Tzu-Chen Lin; Jeng-Kai Jiang; Shih-Ching Chang
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  Are all RAS mutations the same? Coexisting KRAS and NRAS mutations in a caecal adenocarcinoma and contiguous tubulovillous adenoma.

Authors:  N N Vagaja; J Parry; D McCallum; M A Thomas; J M Bentel
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 4.  Deciphering intratumor heterogeneity using cancer genome analysis.

Authors:  Daeun Ryu; Je-Gun Joung; Nayoung K D Kim; Kyu-Tae Kim; Woong-Yang Park
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Profiling cancer gene mutations in clinical formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded colorectal tumor specimens using targeted next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Liangxuan Zhang; Liangjing Chen; Sachin Sah; Gary J Latham; Rajesh Patel; Qinghua Song; Hartmut Koeppen; Rachel Tam; Erica Schleifman; Haider Mashhedi; Sreedevi Chalasani; Ling Fu; Teiko Sumiyoshi; Rajiv Raja; William Forrest; Garret M Hampton; Mark R Lackner; Priti Hegde; Shidong Jia
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-03-24

6.  Effectors of epidermal growth factor receptor pathway: the genetic profiling ofKRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, NRAS mutations in colorectal cancer characteristics and personalized medicine.

Authors:  Yinchen Shen; Jianfei Wang; Xiaohong Han; Hongying Yang; Shuai Wang; Dongmei Lin; Yuankai Shi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Molecular spectrum of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA mutations in Chinese colorectal cancer patients: analysis of 1,110 cases.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Jianming Zheng; Yinghong Yang; Junliang Lu; Jie Gao; Tao Lu; Jian Sun; Hui Jiang; Yan Zhu; Yuhui Zheng; Zhiyong Liang; Tonghua Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  FBXW7 missense mutation: a novel negative prognostic factor in metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Krittiya Korphaisarn; Van Karlyle Morris; Michael J Overman; David R Fogelman; Bryan K Kee; Kanwal Pratap Singh Raghav; Shanequa Manuel; Imad Shureiqi; Robert A Wolff; Cathy Eng; David Menter; Stanley R Hamilton; Scott Kopetz; Arvind Dasari
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-06-13

Review 9.  Next-Generation Sequencing in Oncology: Genetic Diagnosis, Risk Prediction and Cancer Classification.

Authors:  Rick Kamps; Rita D Brandão; Bianca J van den Bosch; Aimee D C Paulussen; Sofia Xanthoulea; Marinus J Blok; Andrea Romano
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Mutational landscape and significance across 12 major cancer types.

Authors:  Cyriac Kandoth; Michael D McLellan; Fabio Vandin; Kai Ye; Beifang Niu; Charles Lu; Mingchao Xie; Qunyuan Zhang; Joshua F McMichael; Matthew A Wyczalkowski; Mark D M Leiserson; Christopher A Miller; John S Welch; Matthew J Walter; Michael C Wendl; Timothy J Ley; Richard K Wilson; Benjamin J Raphael; Li Ding
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  6 in total

1.  Tissue gene mutation profiles in patients with colorectal cancer and their clinical implications.

Authors:  Jun Ye; Mei Lin; Chuanmeng Zhang; Xiaowei Zhu; Sumeng Li; Hui Liu; Jianfeng Yin; Hong Yu; Kuichun Zhu
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2020-05-12

2.  Mutation in BRAF and SMAD4 associated with resistance to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Dan Jiang; Xin Wang; Yajian Wang; Dana Philips; Wenjian Meng; Moli Xiong; Junyi Zhao; Linyong Sun; Du He; Kun Li
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Development, Implementation and Assessment of Molecular Diagnostics by Next Generation Sequencing in Personalized Treatment of Cancer: Experience of a Public Reference Healthcare Hospital.

Authors:  Javier Simarro; Rosa Murria; Gema Pérez-Simó; Marta Llop; Nuria Mancheño; David Ramos; Inmaculada de Juan; Eva Barragán; Begoña Laiz; Enrique Cases; Emilio Ansótegui; José Gómez-Codina; Jorge Aparicio; Carmen Salvador; Óscar Juan; Sarai Palanca
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 6.639

4.  Effect of Tumor Location on Clinicopathological and Molecular Markers in Colorectal Cancer in Eastern China Patients: An Analysis of 2,356 Cases.

Authors:  Yaolin Song; Lili Wang; Wenwen Ran; Guangqi Li; Yujing Xiao; Xiaonan Wang; Li Zhang; Xiaoming Xing
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 4.599

5.  Somatic mutation profiling and HER2 status in KRAS-positive Chinese colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Zhouhuan Dong; Linghong Kong; Zhiyi Wan; Fengwei Zhu; Mei Zhong; Yali Lv; Po Zhao; Huaiyin Shi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Precision medicine for gastrointestinal cancer: Recent progress and future perspective.

Authors:  Tasuku Matsuoka; Masakazu Yashiro
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2020-01-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.