Literature DB >> 29704747

Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: Challenges and opportunities.

Ling Li1, Shuo Hu2, Xiaoyuan Chen3.   

Abstract

In recent years, CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat)/Cas (CRISPR-associated) genome editing systems have become one of the most robust platforms in basic biomedical research and therapeutic applications. To date, efficient in vivo delivery of the CRISPR/Cas9 system to the targeted cells remains a challenge. Although viral vectors have been widely used in the delivery of the CRISPR/Cas9 system in vitro and in vivo, their fundamental shortcomings, such as the risk of carcinogenesis, limited insertion size, immune responses and difficulty in large-scale production, severely limit their further applications. Alternative non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9 are urgently needed. With the rapid development of non-viral vectors, lipid- or polymer-based nanocarriers have shown great potential for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery. In this review, we analyze the pros and cons of delivering CRISPR/Cas9 systems in the form of plasmid, mRNA, or protein and then discuss the limitations and challenges of CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing. Furthermore, current non-viral vectors that have been applied for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery in vitro and in vivo are outlined in details. Finally, critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system are highlighted and promising strategies to overcome these barriers are proposed. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPR/Cas9; Cancer; Clinical translation; Genetic disorder; Nanomedicine; Non-viral delivery

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29704747      PMCID: PMC5944364          DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.04.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  198 in total

1.  Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound increases cellular uptake of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanomaterial: results from human osteosarcoma cell line U2OS.

Authors:  Yi-Xiang J Wang; Ken Cham-Fai Leung; Wing-Hoi Cheung; Hao-Hao Wang; Lin Shi; De-Feng Wang; Ling Qin; Anil T Ahuja
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 2.  Phenotypic plasticity and the epigenetics of human disease.

Authors:  Andrew P Feinberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Targeted genome modification of crop plants using a CRISPR-Cas system.

Authors:  Qiwei Shan; Yanpeng Wang; Jun Li; Yi Zhang; Kunling Chen; Zhen Liang; Kang Zhang; Jinxing Liu; Jianzhong Jeff Xi; Jin-Long Qiu; Caixia Gao
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  A gene delivery system containing nuclear localization signal: Increased nucleus import and transfection efficiency with the assistance of RanGAP1.

Authors:  Kang Chen; Lingling Guo; Jiulong Zhang; Qing Chen; Kuanglei Wang; Chenxi Li; Weinan Li; Mingxi Qiao; Xiuli Zhao; Haiyang Hu; Dawei Chen
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 8.947

5.  Efficient genome modification by CRISPR-Cas9 nickase with minimal off-target effects.

Authors:  Bin Shen; Wensheng Zhang; Jun Zhang; Jiankui Zhou; Jianying Wang; Li Chen; Lu Wang; Alex Hodgkins; Vivek Iyer; Xingxu Huang; William C Skarnes
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 6.  Clearance properties of nano-sized particles and molecules as imaging agents: considerations and caveats.

Authors:  Michelle Longmire; Peter L Choyke; Hisataka Kobayashi
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.307

7.  A mechanism for the suppression of homologous recombination in G1 cells.

Authors:  Alexandre Orthwein; Sylvie M Noordermeer; Marcus D Wilson; Sébastien Landry; Radoslav I Enchev; Alana Sherker; Meagan Munro; Jordan Pinder; Jayme Salsman; Graham Dellaire; Bing Xia; Matthias Peter; Daniel Durocher
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The effect of endosomal escape peptides on in vitro gene delivery of polyethylene glycol-based vehicles.

Authors:  Nicole M Moore; Clayton L Sheppard; Tiffany R Barbour; Shelly E Sakiyama-Elbert
Journal:  J Gene Med       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.565

9.  Genome editing with RNA-guided Cas9 nuclease in zebrafish embryos.

Authors:  Nannan Chang; Changhong Sun; Lu Gao; Dan Zhu; Xiufei Xu; Xiaojun Zhu; Jing-Wei Xiong; Jianzhong Jeff Xi
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 25.617

10.  Exploiting CRISPR-Cas nucleases to produce sequence-specific antimicrobials.

Authors:  David Bikard; Chad W Euler; Wenyan Jiang; Philip M Nussenzweig; Gregory W Goldberg; Xavier Duportet; Vincent A Fischetti; Luciano A Marraffini
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-10-05       Impact factor: 54.908

View more
  72 in total

Review 1.  Applied Bioengineering in Tissue Reconstruction, Replacement, and Regeneration.

Authors:  Juan M Colazo; Brian C Evans; Angel F Farinas; Salam Al-Kassis; Craig L Duvall; Wesley P Thayer
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 2.  Recent advances in liposome formulations for breast cancer therapeutics.

Authors:  Biyao Yang; Bo-Ping Song; Shaina Shankar; Anna Guller; Wei Deng
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 9.261

3.  CRISPR-delivery particles targeting nuclear receptor-interacting protein 1 (Nrip1) in adipose cells to enhance energy expenditure.

Authors:  Yuefei Shen; Jessica L Cohen; Sarah M Nicoloro; Mark Kelly; Batuhan Yenilmez; Felipe Henriques; Emmanouela Tsagkaraki; Yvonne J K Edwards; Xiaodi Hu; Randall H Friedline; Jason K Kim; Michael P Czech
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 4.  [Development of CRISPR technology and its application in bone and cartilage tissue engineering].

Authors:  Guo Chen; Du Cheng; Bin Chen
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2019-12-30

5.  Nonviral Nanoparticles for CRISPR-Based Genome Editing: Is It Just a Simple Adaption of What Have Been Developed for Nucleic Acid Delivery?

Authors:  Min Qiu; Zachary Glass; Qiaobing Xu
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 6.988

6.  Therapeutic genome editing of triple-negative breast tumors using a noncationic and deformable nanolipogel.

Authors:  Peng Guo; Jiang Yang; Jing Huang; Debra T Auguste; Marsha A Moses
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Scaffold-Based Delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 Ribonucleoproteins for Genome Editing.

Authors:  Wai Hon Chooi; Jiah Shin Chin; Sing Yian Chew
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

8.  Rational design of semiconducting polymer brushes as cancer theranostics.

Authors:  Zhen Yang; Ling Li; Albert J Jin; Wei Huang; Xiaoyuan Chen
Journal:  Mater Horiz       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 13.266

9.  Delivery of Tissue-Targeted Scalpels: Opportunities and Challenges for In Vivo CRISPR/Cas-Based Genome Editing.

Authors:  Tuo Wei; Qiang Cheng; Lukas Farbiak; Daniel G Anderson; Robert Langer; Daniel J Siegwart
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 15.881

10.  Coactivation of Endogenous Wnt10b and Foxc2 by CRISPR Activation Enhances BMSC Osteogenesis and Promotes Calvarial Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Mu-Nung Hsu; Kai-Lun Huang; Fu-Jen Yu; Po-Liang Lai; Anh Vu Truong; Mei-Wei Lin; Nuong Thi Kieu Nguyen; Chih-Che Shen; Shiaw-Min Hwang; Yu-Han Chang; Yu-Chen Hu
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 11.454

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.