| Literature DB >> 29701667 |
Ping Zhang1,2, Saina Li3, Juan Li4, Feng Wei5, Xianlong Cheng6, Guifeng Zhang7, Shuangcheng Ma8, Bin Liu9.
Abstract
Since the cost of Ophiocordyceps sinensis, an important fungal drug used in Chinese medicine, has increased dramatically, and the counterfeits may have adverse health effects, a rapid and precise marker using the peptide mass spectrometry identification system could significantly enhance the regulatory capacity. In this study, we determined the marker peptides in the digested mixtures of fungal proteins in wild O. sinensis fruiting bodies and various commercially available mycelium fermented powders using ultra-performance liquid chromatography/Orbitrap Fusion mass spectrometry coupled with chemometrics. The results indicated the following marker peptides: TLLEAIDSIEPPK (m/z 713.39) was identified in the wild O. sinensis fruiting body, AVLSDAITLVR (m/z 579.34) was detected in the fermented O. sinensis mycelium powder, FAELLEK (m/z 849.47) was found in the fermented Ophiocordyceps mycelium powder, LESVVTSFTK (m/z 555.80) was discovered in the artificial Ophiocordyceps mycelium powder, and VPSSAVLR (m/z 414.75) was observed in O. mortierella mycelium powder. In order to verify the specificity and applicability of the method, the five marker peptides were synthesized and tested on all samples. All in all, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that mass spectrometry has been employed to detect the marker peptides of O.sinensis and its related products.Entities:
Keywords: Ophiocordyceps sinensis; chemometrics; fungi marker peptide; quality control; ultra-performance liquid chromatography/Orbitrap Fusion mass spectrometry
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29701667 PMCID: PMC6100002 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23051013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1The gelfiltration chromatograms of (A) fungal protein from fermented O. sinensis mycelia powder and (B–E) therespective digest peptidesincubated at 37 °C for 18 h with sample-to-trypsin ratios of (B) 100:1; (C) 100:2; (D) 100:5; and (E) 100:10.
Figure 2The positive-ion base-peak-intensity chromatograms of the digest peptides of: (A) wild O. sinensis fruiting body; (B) fermented O. sinensis mycelia powder; (C) fermented Ophiocordyceps mycelia powder; (D) artificial Ophiocordyceps mycelia powder; and (E) O. mortierella mycelia powder.
Figure 3(a) The principal component analysis score plot of (): wild O. sinensis fruiting body, (): fermented O.S. mycelia powder, (): artificial Ophiocordyceps mycelia powder, (): fermented Ophiocordyceps mycelia powder, (): O. mortierella mycelia powder, and (b) the loading plot of wild O. sinensis and four cultured Ophiocordyceps mycelia.
Figure 4The selected ion-monitoring chromatograms of marker peptides in (A) wild O. sinensis fruiting body, m/z 713.39, a doubly charged TLLEAIDSIEPPK fragment ion; (B) fermented O. sinensis mycelia powder, m/z 579.34, a doubly charged AVLSDAITLVR fragment ion; (C) fermented Ophiocordyceps mycelia powder, m/z 849.47, a singly charged FAELLEK fragment ion; (D) artificial Ophiocordyceps mycelia powder, m/z 555.80, a doubly charged LESVVTSFTK fragment ion; and (E) O. mortierella mycelia powder, m/z 414.75, a doubly charged VPSSAVLR fragment ion. Correspondingly, the fragment ion mass spectrogram of marker peptides in (a) wild O. sinensis fruiting body; (b) fermented O. sinensis mycelia powder; (c) fermented Ophiocordyceps mycelia powder; (d) artificial Ophiocordyceps mycelia powder; and (e) O. mortierella mycelia powder.
The multianalyte results of the marker peptides from Ophiocordyceps sinensis and the four cultured O. mycelia.
| Marker | Mascot Matching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Item | No.of Ions | Precursor Ion, ( | Charge | Fragment Ion, ( | Time, (min) | Peptide Match | Peptide Fragmentation | Protein Match |
|
| 1 | 713.39 | 2 | 41.1 | TLLEAIDSIEPPK | gi:A4U9H1 | ||
| 969.52 | y | ( | ||||||
| 898.48 | y | |||||||
| 785.4 | y | |||||||
| 215.13 | b | |||||||
| 452.25 | y0 | |||||||
| 881.46 | y * | |||||||
| 2 | 851.74 | 3 | 46.2 | SVEMHHEQLTEGLPGDNVGFNVK | gi: 0A060IK44 | |||
| 1046.52 | y | ( | ||||||
| 949.47 | y | |||||||
| 497.7 | b++ | |||||||
| 596.25 | b *++ | |||||||
| 777.42 | y | |||||||
| 1208.54 | b | |||||||
| fermented | 3 | 579.34 | 2 | 35 | AVLSDAITLVR | gi: T5AC53 | ||
| 987.58 | y | ( | ||||||
| 874.49 | y | |||||||
| 787.46 | y | |||||||
| 672.44 | y | |||||||
| 488.31 | y | |||||||
| 142.6 | b++ | |||||||
| 4 | 670.3 | 2 | 14.5 | NAGSGCPTYTVGR | gi: T5AC53 | |||
| 1154.52 | y |
| ||||||
| 1010.47 | y | |||||||
| 397.21 | y++ | |||||||
| 370.13 | b * | |||||||
| 387.16 | b | |||||||
| 5 | 614.85 | 2 | 54.7 | MVEVLGIIQAR | gi: T5AC53 | |||
| 657.4 | y |
| ||||||
| 770.48 | y | |||||||
| 998.59 | y | |||||||
| 231.11 | b | |||||||
| 360.15 | b | |||||||
| artificial | 6 | 555.8 | 2 | 26 | LESVVTSFTK | gi: 0A0B7JUZ6 | ||
| 868.47 | y | ( | ||||||
| 682.37 | y | |||||||
| 243.13 | b | |||||||
| 215.12 | b++ | |||||||
| 482.75 | b++ | |||||||
| 7 | 637.34 | 2 | 44.9 | HALVIYDDLSK | gi: 0A0B7JUZ6 | |||
| 952.49 | y |
| ||||||
| 740.34 | y | |||||||
| 577.28 | y | |||||||
| 209.1 | b | |||||||
| 534.33 | b | |||||||
| fermented | 8 | 849.47 | 1 | 22.6 | (FAELLEK) | Unassigned | ||
| 502.32 | y | |||||||
| 389.23 | y | |||||||
| 348.15 | b | |||||||
| 9 | 799.44 | 2 | 966.52 | 58 | YLEIIKETSNFIK | y | gi: A0A172PXZ9 | |
| 596.85 | y++ | ( | ||||||
| 406.19 | b | |||||||
| 990.55 | b | |||||||
| 487.26 | b *++ | |||||||
| 10 | 414.75 | 2 | 13.6 | (VPSSAVLR) | Unassigned | |||
| 458.3 | y | |||||||
| 370.24 | y * | |||||||
| 387.27 | y | |||||||
| 142.58 | b++ | |||||||
Note: y *(m/ z= 881.46) ion was dehydroxylated ion of y (m/ z= 898.48); b *++ (m/z = 596.25) ion was dehydroxylated ion of b (m/z = 1208.54) with two charges, b * (m/z = 370.13) ion was dehydroxylated ion of b (m/z = 387.16), b *++ (m/z = 487.26) ion was dehydroxylated ion of b (m/z = 990.55) with two charges, and y * (m/z = 370.24) ion was dehydroxylated ion of y (m/z = 387.27).
The Ophiocordyceps-related samples’ information included in this study.
| Sample Status | Claimed Names a | No. of Samples | Locations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wild fruiting body |
| 4 | Tibet |
| Cultured mycelium powder b | Fermented | 5 | Zhejiang |
| Fermented | 6 | Jiangxi | |
| Artificial | 8 | Hebei | |
| 5 | Zhejiang |
a Sample names when they were collected; b cultured mycelium powder was collected from the manufacturing enterprise of each sample.
Figure 5Scheme of the developed method.