| Literature DB >> 29698400 |
Saínza García1,2,3, Susana Alberich1,2, Mónica Martínez-Cengotitabengoa1,2,3,4, Celso Arango1,5,6, Josefina Castro-Fornieles1,7,8,9, Mara Parellada1,5,6, Inmaculada Baeza1,7,8, Carmen Moreno1,5,6, Juan Antonio Micó1,10,11, Esther Berrocoso1,10,11, Montserrat Graell1,12, Soraya Otero1,13,14,15, Tatiana Simal16, Ana González-Pinto1,2,3.
Abstract
Oxidative stress is a pathophysiological mechanism potentially involved in psychiatric disorders. The objective of this study was to assess the relationship between total antioxidant status (TAS) and the functional status of patients with a first episode of psychosis at the onset of the disease. For this purpose, a sample of 70 patients aged between 9 and 17 years with a first episode of psychosis were followed up for a period of two years. Blood samples were drawn to measure TAS levels at three time points: at baseline, at one year, and at two years. Clinical symptoms and functioning were also assessed at the same time points using various scales. Linear regression analysis was performed to investigate the relationship between TAS and clinical status at each assessment, adjusting for potential confounding factors. The distribution of clinical variables was grouped in different percentiles to assess the dose-response in the relation between clinical variables and TAS. At baseline, patient's score on Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) was directly and significantly associated with TAS with a monotonic increase in percentiles, and surprising this association was reversed after one and two years of follow-up with a monotonic decrease. In summary at the onset of the illness, TAS is positively related to clinical status, whereas as the illness progresses this correlation is reversed and becomes negative. This may be the result of an adaptive response.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29698400 PMCID: PMC5919675 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194685
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Sociodemographic characteristics and total antioxidant status (TAS).
| Age in years, n (SD) | 15.70 (1.63) |
| Sex (M/F), mean (%) | 50 (71.4)/20(28.6) |
| Drug use, n baseline (%) | |
| Tobacco | 20 (28.6) |
| Cannabis | 20 (28.6) |
| Alcohol | 17 (24.3) |
| Socioeconomic status, n (%) | |
| 5 (lowest) | 14 (20.0) |
| 4 | 23 (32.9) |
| 3 | 18 (25.7) |
| 2 | 6 (8.6) |
| 1 (highest) | 9 (12.9) |
| Type of living arrangement, n (%) | |
| Birth parents | 64 (91.4) |
| Alone | 1 (1.4) |
| Other | 5 (7.2) |
| Ethnic group, n (%) | |
| Caucasian | 64 (91.4) |
| Hispanic | 4 (5.7) |
| Other | 2 (2.9) |
| Antipsychotic dose (chlorpromazine equivalent units), mean (SD) | |
| Baseline | 260.66 (170.76) |
| 1 year | 267,99 (234,77) |
| 2 years | 213,42 (133,11) |
| TAS (mM), mean (SD) | |
| Baseline | 0.95 (0.30) |
| 1 year | 0.99 (0.42) |
| 2 years | 1.14 (0.36) |
Scores in the clinical assessments at the three time points.
| PANSS Pos, mean (SD) | 24.2 (6.16) | 12.63 (6.0) | 12.11 (5.47) |
| PANSS Neg, mean (SD) | 21.07 (8.83) | 16.54 (6.6) | 14.69 (6.40) |
| PANSS Gen, mean (SD) | 47.01 (10.77) | 29.63 (11.1) | 27.46 (8.17) |
| PANSS Tot, mean (SD) | 92.3 (20.41) | 58.80 (20.7) | 54.27 (17.54) |
| YMRS, mean (SD) | 17.77 (11.46) | 4.90 (7.6) | 4.04 (5.20) |
| HDRS, mean (SD) | 19.31 (9.26) | 5.76 (6.9) | 4.88 (3.99) |
| CGAS, mean (SD) | 37.41 (14.22) | 63.52(16.9) | 67.11(18.13) |
*p<0.05
**p<0.01
Pos (positive), Neg (negative), Gen (General), Tot (total)
Coefficients of linear regression models between clinical assessment and TAS level at each visit point.
| PANSS Pos | — | B = 0.024; p<0.05 | B = 0.030; p<0.05 |
| PANSS Neg | — | — | B = 0.025; p<0.05 |
| PANSS Gen | — | — | B = 0.021;p<0.05 |
| PANSS Tot | — | — | B = 0.011; p<0.01 |
| YMRS | — | B = 0.018; p<0.05 | B = 0.027; p = 0.05 |
| HDRS | — | — | — |
| CGAS | B = 0.005; p<0.05 | B = -0.011; p<0.01 | B = -0.009; p<0.05 |
Pos (positive), Neg (negative), Gen (General), Tot (total)
Fig 1Relationship between total antioxidant status (TAS) and Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) scores over a two year follow-up.
Effect size of CGAS on TAS (and 95% CIs).
| Percentiles | CGAS | TAS Effect Size (95% CI) | CGAS | TAS Effect Size | CGAS | TAS Effect Size |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | 0.08 (0.002, 0.148) | 35 | -0.39 (-0.626, -0.144) | 35 | -0.32 (-0.573, -0.068) | |
| 30 | 0.15 (0.003, 0.297) | 50 | -0.55 (-0.894, -0.206) | 51 | -0.46 (-0.828, -0.092) | |
| 40 | 0.20 (0.004, 0.396) | 63 | -0.69 (-1.124, -0.256) | 70.5 | -0.64 (-1.149, -0.131) | |
| 45 | 0.23 (0.010, 0.450) | 80 | -0.88 (-1.431, -0.329) | 85 | -0.77 (-1.383, -0.157) | |
| 60 | 0.33 (0.012, 0.648) | 95 | -1.05 (-1.704, -0.396) | 95 | -0.86 (-1.545, -0.175) | |
Fig 2Relationship between CGAS score and TAS level at baseline and at two-year follow-up assessment.
a) At baseline, there is a positive significant relationship between CGAS and TAS indicating that the better the patient's functioning, the higher his level of TAS; b) at one year and at two years of follow-up, this relationship is significantly reversed, with patients with the highest levels of TAS having the worst functionality.