Literature DB >> 2969811

Left ventricular systolic function in aortic stenosis.

H P Krayenbuehl1, O M Hess, M Ritter, E S Monrad, H Hoppeler.   

Abstract

In aortic valve stenosis, concentric hypertrophy develops which is characterized by a reduced end-diastolic radius-to-wall thickness ratio (r/h) with an essentially normal cavity shape. As long as the product of (r/h) and LV systolic pressure remains constant, hypertrophy is appropriate. An increase in the product, which represents an increase in wall stress signals inadequate LV hypertrophy. Although at first glance, massive LV hypertrophy appears favourable for the maintenance of a normal LV ejection fraction in aortic stenosis, data from 23 studies of the literature have shown an inverse relationship between ejection fraction and LV angiographic mass m-2 (r = -0.59). Both a degree of hypertrophy inadequate to keep systolic wall stress within normal limits and a reduction of LV contractility may explain the depression of ejection fraction when LV angiographic mass is sizeably increased. Conversely, a normal ejection fraction in aortic stenosis may not be indicative of normal systolic myocardial function under all circumstances. In the presence of mildly reduced contractility, a normal ejection fraction may be maintained by the use of preload reserve. Assessment of myocardial structure from LV endomyocardial biopsies revealed no differences in muscle fibre diameter, interstitial fibrosis and volume fraction of myofibrils between patients with aortic stenosis having a normal and those with a depressed ejection fraction. Preoperative ejection fraction is a poor predictor of postoperative survival, whereas markedly increased preoperative angiographic mass and end-systolic volume have been reported to predict an unsatisfactory postoperative outcome characterized by either death or poor LV function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2969811     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/9.suppl_e.19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  13 in total

Review 1.  Inhibition of hypertrophy is a good therapeutic strategy in ventricular pressure overload.

Authors:  Gabriele G Schiattarella; Joseph A Hill
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  The response to Trendelenburg position is minimally affected by underlying hemodynamic conditions in patients with aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Abraham Sonny; Daniel I Sessler; Jing You; Babak Kateby Kashy; Sheryar Sarwar; Akhil K Singh; Shiva Sale; Andrej Alfirevic; Andra E Duncan
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 3.  Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis and heart failure.

Authors:  Chirag Bavishi; Dhaval Kolte; Paul C Gordon; J Dawn Abbott
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.214

4.  Geometrical characteristics of aortic root and left ventricular dysfunction in aortic stenosis: quantification of 256-slice coronary CT angiography.

Authors:  Michinobu Nagao; Yuzo Yamasaki; Takeshi Kamitani; Satoshi Kawanami; Masatoshi Kondo; Hiromichi Sonoda; Taisuke Fujioka; Hiroshi Honda
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Reduced Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain Predicts Prolonged Hospitalization: A Cohort Analysis of Patients Having Aortic Valve Replacement Surgery.

Authors:  Abraham Sonny; Andrej Alfirevic; Shiva Sale; Nicole M Zimmerman; Jing You; A Marc Gillinov; Daniel I Sessler; Andra E Duncan
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  Myocardial oxygen consumption in aortic valve disease with and without left ventricular dysfunction.

Authors:  J Schwitter; F R Eberli; M Ritter; M Turina; H P Krayenbuehl
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1992-02

7.  Left atrioventricular plane displacement but not left ventricular ejection fraction is influenced by the degree of aortic stenosis.

Authors:  E Rydberg; P Gudmundsson; L Kennedy; L Erhardt; R Willenheimer
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Risk stratification and management of aortic stenosis with concomitant left ventricular dysfunction.

Authors:  Matthew L Steinhauser; Peter H Stone
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2007-12

9.  Control of whole heart geometry by intramyocardial mechano-feedback: a model study.

Authors:  Theo Arts; Joost Lumens; Wilco Kroon; Tammo Delhaas
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Prognostic impact of myocardial contraction fraction in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Francisco J Romeo; Ignacio M Seropian; Sameer Arora; John P Vavalle; Mariano Falconi; Pablo Oberti; Vadim Kotowicz; Carla R Agatiello; Daniel H Berrocal
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2020-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.