Literature DB >> 32175223

Prognostic impact of myocardial contraction fraction in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis.

Francisco J Romeo1, Ignacio M Seropian1, Sameer Arora2, John P Vavalle2, Mariano Falconi3, Pablo Oberti3, Vadim Kotowicz4, Carla R Agatiello1, Daniel H Berrocal1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Myocardial contraction fraction (MCF), a volumetric measurement of myocardial shortening, may help to improve risk stratification in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) referred for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) especially in those with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We investigated the association between MCF and 1-year all-cause mortality in patients with severe AS who underwent TAVR.
METHODS: MCF was calculated as the ratio of stroke volume (SV) to myocardial volume. Patients referred for TAVR from 2011 to 2015 were eligible for inclusion and were divided into two groups according to the estimated MCF (MCF ≤30% vs. MCF >30%). The primary endpoint was 1-year all-cause mortality. A Cox regression analysis was performed for independent risk factors of mortality. Receiver operating curve (ROC) was performed for assessing the best cut-off point of MCF for predicting the primary outcome [area under the curve (AUC) 0.60; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.453-0.725]. Baseline patient and echo characteristics were included for multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: Of 126 patients (mean age 82±5 years, 45.2% male), 44.4% showed MCF ≤30%. Patient with reduced MCF showed higher body mass index (28.1±5.8 vs. 26.0±4.5 kg/m2, P=0.031), higher surgical EuroScore II (6.2±4.5 vs. 4.7±3.2, P=0.032), lower LVEF (54.2%±11.9% vs. 58.5%±10.8%, P=0.042) and more severe AS (indexed aortic valve area 0.40±0.09 vs. 0.45±0.10 cm2/m2, P=0.030). The median follow-up was of 14 [3.5-33] months, and 16% of patients died. Patients with MCF ≤30% showed significantly increased all-cause mortality (Log-rank P=0.002). In a multivariate model adjusting for clinical and echo variables, MCF ≤30% was independently associated with increased risk for all-cause 1-year mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 2.76, 95% CI: 1.03-7.77, P=0.04].
CONCLUSIONS: In a population of patients undergoing TAVR, MCF ≤30% was independently associated with increased mortality. 2020 Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Myocardial contraction fraction (MCF); aortic stenosis (AS); transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)

Year:  2020        PMID: 32175223      PMCID: PMC7044096          DOI: 10.21037/cdt.2019.05.02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther        ISSN: 2223-3652


  31 in total

1.  Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery.

Authors:  Martin B Leon; Craig R Smith; Michael Mack; D Craig Miller; Jeffrey W Moses; Lars G Svensson; E Murat Tuzcu; John G Webb; Gregory P Fontana; Raj R Makkar; David L Brown; Peter C Block; Robert A Guyton; Augusto D Pichard; Joseph E Bavaria; Howard C Herrmann; Pamela S Douglas; John L Petersen; Jodi J Akin; William N Anderson; Duolao Wang; Stuart Pocock
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Long-Axis Strain and Myocardial Contraction Fraction Using Standard Cardiovascular MR Imaging in Patients with Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathies.

Authors:  Nisha Arenja; Johannes H Riffel; Thomas Fritz; Florian André; Fabian Aus dem Siepen; Matthias Mueller-Hennessen; Evangelos Giannitsis; Hugo A Katus; Matthias G Friedrich; Sebastian J Buss
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Strain analysis in patients with severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction undergoing surgical valve replacement.

Authors:  Victoria Delgado; Laurens F Tops; Rutger J van Bommel; Frank van der Kley; Nina Ajmone Marsan; Robert J Klautz; Michel I M Versteegh; Eduard R Holman; Martin J Schalij; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 4.  Transcatheter aortic valve replacement for patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Dominique Himbert; Alec Vahanian
Journal:  Heart Fail Clin       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.179

Review 5.  Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Roberto M Lang; Luigi P Badano; Victor Mor-Avi; Jonathan Afilalo; Anderson Armstrong; Laura Ernande; Frank A Flachskampf; Elyse Foster; Steven A Goldstein; Tatiana Kuznetsova; Patrizio Lancellotti; Denisa Muraru; Michael H Picard; Ernst R Rietzschel; Lawrence Rudski; Kirk T Spencer; Wendy Tsang; Jens-Uwe Voigt
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  Relation of the Myocardial Contraction Fraction, as Calculated from M-Mode Echocardiography, With Incident Heart Failure, Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality (Results from the Cardiovascular Health Study).

Authors:  Mathew S Maurer; William J H Koh; Traci M Bartz; Sirish Vullaganti; Eddy Barasch; Julius M Gardin; John S Gottdiener; Bruce M Psaty; Jorge R Kizer
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Clinicopathological features of senile systemic amyloidosis: an ante- and post-mortem study.

Authors:  Mitsuharu Ueda; Yoko Horibata; Makoto Shono; Yohei Misumi; Toshinori Oshima; Yu Su; Masayoshi Tasaki; Satoru Shinriki; Satomi Kawahara; Hirofumi Jono; Konen Obayashi; Hisao Ogawa; Yukio Ando
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 7.842

8.  The myocardial contraction fraction is superior to ejection fraction in predicting survival in patients with AL cardiac amyloidosis.

Authors:  Amanda Tendler; Stephen Helmke; Sergio Teruya; Julissa Alvarez; Mathew S Maurer
Journal:  Amyloid       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 7.141

9.  Early regression of severe left ventricular hypertrophy after transcatheter aortic valve replacement is associated with decreased hospitalizations.

Authors:  Brian R Lindman; William J Stewart; Philippe Pibarot; Rebecca T Hahn; Catherine M Otto; Ke Xu; Richard B Devereux; Neil J Weissman; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano; Wilson Y Szeto; Raj Makkar; D Craig Miller; Stamatios Lerakis; Samir Kapadia; Bruce Bowers; Kevin L Greason; Thomas C McAndrew; Yang Lei; Martin B Leon; Pamela S Douglas
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 11.195

10.  Outcomes of transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients with aortic stenosis and left ventricular dysfunction: results from the Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) trial (cohort A).

Authors:  Sammy Elmariah; Igor F Palacios; Thomas McAndrew; Irene Hueter; Ignacio Inglessis; Joshua N Baker; Susheel Kodali; Martin B Leon; Lars Svensson; Philippe Pibarot; Pamela S Douglas; William F Fearon; Ajay J Kirtane; Hersh S Maniar; Jonathan J Passeri
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 6.546

View more
  3 in total

1.  Comparison of Nonclassic and Classic Phenotype of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Focused on Prognostic Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Parameters: A Single-Center Observational Study.

Authors:  Magdalena Stachera; Paweł Przybyło; Katarzyna Sznajder; Marek Gierlotka
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-28

2.  Improvement of hemodynamic parameters in aortic stenosis patients with transcatheter valve replacement by using impedance cardiography.

Authors:  Luqing Wan; Jianjun Tang; Yanchao Xiao; Hui Li; Zengjin Peng; Dan-Yan Xu; Li Shen
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-09-20

3.  Myocardial contraction fraction predicts mortality for patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Hang Liao; Ziqiong Wang; Liming Zhao; Xiaoping Chen; Sen He
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.