Literature DB >> 29696552

Open Relationships, Nonconsensual Nonmonogamy, and Monogamy Among U.S. Adults: Findings from the 2012 National Survey of Sexual Health and Behavior.

Ethan Czuy Levine1, Debby Herbenick2, Omar Martinez3, Tsung-Chieh Fu2, Brian Dodge2.   

Abstract

People in open and other consensually nonmonogamous partnerships have been historically underserved by researchers and providers. Many studies group such partnerships together with nonconsensual nonmonogamy (NCNM) under the banner of "concurrent sexual partnerships." Discrimination from service providers poses a substantial barrier to care. Responding to such concerns, this investigation explored sociodemographic correlates with open relationships and associations between relationship structure and sexual risk, HIV/STI testing, and relationship satisfaction in a nationally representative probability sample. Data were drawn from the 2012 National Survey of Sexual Health and Behavior (n = 2270). We used multinomial logistic regression to identify correlates with relationship structure, and linear and logistic regression to investigate associations between relationship structure and testing, condom use, and relationship satisfaction. Eighty-nine percent of participants reported monogamy, 4% reported open relationships, and 8% reported NCNM. Males, gay/lesbian individuals, bisexual individuals, and those who identified as "Other, Non-Hispanic" were more likely to report open relationships. Bisexual individuals and Black, Non-Hispanic participants were more likely to report NCNM; older participants were less likely to do so. Participants in open relationships reported more frequent condom use for anal intercourse and lower relationship satisfaction than monogamous participants. NCNM participants reported more HIV testing and lower satisfaction. Identities, experiences, and behaviors within open and other consensually nonmonogamous populations should be regarded as unique and diverse, rather than conflated with those common to other relationship structures. There is a need for greater awareness of diverse relationship structures among researchers and providers, and incorporation of related content into educational programming.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Consensual nonmonogamy; HIV and STI testing; Open relationships; Relationship structure; Sexual behaviors; Sexual minorities

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29696552      PMCID: PMC5958351          DOI: 10.1007/s10508-018-1178-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Sex Behav        ISSN: 0004-0002


  22 in total

1.  Concurrent sexual partnerships among women in the United States.

Authors:  Adaora A Adimora; Victor J Schoenbach; Dana M Bonas; Francis E A Martinson; Kathryn H Donaldson; Tonya R Stancil
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  Monogamy versus Consensual Non-Monogamy: Alternative Approaches to Pursuing a Strategically Pluralistic Mating Strategy.

Authors:  Justin K Mogilski; Stacy L Memering; Lisa L M Welling; Todd K Shackelford
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2015-12-17

3.  Concurrent partnerships and HIV prevalence disparities by race: linking science and public health practice.

Authors:  Martina Morris; Ann E Kurth; Deven T Hamilton; James Moody; Steve Wakefield
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Contemporary Polyamory: A Call for Awareness and Sensitivity in Social Work.

Authors:  D J Williams; Emily E Prior
Journal:  Soc Work       Date:  2015-07

Review 5.  A critical examination of popular assumptions about the benefits and outcomes of monogamous relationships.

Authors:  Terri D Conley; Ali Ziegler; Amy C Moors; Jes L Matsick; Brandon Valentine
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-11-21

6.  Reducing Concurrent Sexual Partnerships Among Blacks in the Rural Southeastern United States: Development of Narrative Messages for a Radio Campaign.

Authors:  Joan R Cates; Diane B Francis; Catalina Ramirez; Jane D Brown; Victor J Schoenbach; Thierry Fortune; Wizdom Powell Hammond; Adaora A Adimora
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2015-07-02

7.  Monogamy, the Protective Fallacy: Sexual versus Emotional Exclusivity and the Implication for Sexual Health Risk.

Authors:  D Joye Swan; Suzanne C Thompson
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2015-07-13

8.  Concurrent sexual partnerships among young heterosexual adults at increased HIV risk: types and characteristics.

Authors:  Jocelyn T Warren; S Marie Harvey; Isaac Joel Washburn; Diana Maria Sanchez; Victor J Schoenbach; Christopher R Agnew
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.830

9.  Prevalence of Experiences With Consensual Nonmonogamous Relationships: Findings From Two National Samples of Single Americans.

Authors:  M L Haupert; Amanda N Gesselman; Amy C Moors; Helen E Fisher; Justin R Garcia
Journal:  J Sex Marital Ther       Date:  2016-04-20

10.  Around Consensual Nonmonogamies: Assessing Attitudes Toward Nonexclusive Relationships.

Authors:  Katarzyna Grunt-Mejer; Christine Campbell
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2015-08-04
View more
  20 in total

1.  (De)Politicizing Polyamory: Social Media Comments on Media Representations of Consensual Non-Monogamies.

Authors:  Daniel Cardoso; Ana Rosa; Marisa Torres da Silva
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-05-11

2.  Are there "Better" and "Worse" Ways to be Consensually Non-Monogamous (CNM)?: CNM Types and CNM-Specific Predictors of Dyadic Adjustment.

Authors:  Terri D Conley; Jennifer L Piemonte
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-06-07

3.  Comparing the Self-Reported Health, Happiness, and Marital Happiness of a Multinational Sample of Consensually Non-Monogamous Adults with Those of the U.S. General Population: Additional Comparisons by Gender, Number of Sexual Partners, Frequency of Sex, and Marital Status.

Authors:  Derrell W Cox; James R Fleckenstein; Lori R Sims-Cox
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-06-08

4.  Introduction to the Special Section on Consensual Non-Monogamy.

Authors:  Lisa Dawn Hamilton; Carm De Santis; Ashley E Thompson
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-06-04

5.  Sexual Risk Behaviors Among Black and Puerto Rican Women in Their Late Thirties: A Brief Report.

Authors:  Kerstin Pahl; Jung Yeon Lee; Ariadna Capasso; Helen-Maria Lekas; Judith S Brook; Jewel Winters
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2019-12

6.  What Drives the Dehumanization of Consensual Non-Monogamous Partners?

Authors:  David L Rodrigues; Diniz Lopes; Aleksandra Huic
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-05-04

7.  Sameness and Difference in Psychological Research on Consensually Non-Monogamous Relationships: The Need for Invariance and Equivalence Testing.

Authors:  John K Sakaluk; Christopher Quinn-Nilas; Alexandra N Fisher; Connor E Leshner; Ella Huber; Jessica R Wood
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-08-28

8.  Compersion: When Jealousy-Inducing Situations Don't (Just) Induce Jealousy.

Authors:  Rhonda N Balzarini; James N McDonald; Taylor Kohut; Justin J Lehmiller; Bjarne M Holmes; Jennifer J Harman
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-05-26

9.  Longitudinal predictors of male sexual partner risk among Black and Latina women in their late thirties: ethnic/racial identity commitment as a protective factor.

Authors:  Kerstin Pahl; Ariadna Capasso; Helen-Maria Lekas; Jung Yeon Lee; Jewel Winters; Rafael E Pérez-Figueroa
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2020-09-23

10.  Exploring Variations in North American Adults' Attitudes, Interest, Experience, and Outcomes Related to Mixed-Gender Threesomes: A Replication and Extension.

Authors:  Ashley E Thompson; Allison E Cipriano; Kimberley M Kirkeby; Delaney Wilder; Justin J Lehmiller
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-11-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.