| Literature DB >> 29692662 |
Ewa Krasuska-Sławińska1, Bożenna Dembowska-Bagińska2, Agnieszka Brożyna2, Dorota Olczak-Kowalczyk3, Elżbieta Czarnowska4, Agnieszka Sowińska4.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Chemotherapy, neoplasms, and their complications linked to malabsorption, malnutrition, and metabolic disorders may lead to improper tooth development and frequent severe caries in patients during/after antineoplastic treatment and to a more frequent improper tooth development in patients undergoing chemotherapy during odontogenesis. However, the causes of these abnormalities remain unknown; there are no studies on the impact of antineoplastic treatment and its complications on the chemical composition of mineralised teeth. AIM OF THE STUDY: To compare the chemical composition of mineralised teeth extracted due to complicated caries in children after chemotherapy, and of teeth extracted due to orthodontic treatment in generally healthy children.Entities:
Keywords: chemical composition of mineralised teeth; chemotherapy; children
Year: 2018 PMID: 29692662 PMCID: PMC5909729 DOI: 10.5114/wo.2018.74392
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contemp Oncol (Pozn) ISSN: 1428-2526
Fig. 1Stereo microscope image of tooth with indicated element measurement points assessed with X-ray analysis
Fig. 2The calcium to phosphorus ratio in teeth of patients after chemotherapy and controls
Mass content of elements within enamel opacities after chemotherapy vs. macroscopically unchanged enamel in groups 1 and 2
| Chemical element | Mass percent | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD |
| ||
| healthy enamel | |||
| group 1 vs. | group 1 vs. | ||
| group 2 | group 2 | ||
| Ca | 24.446 ±12.282 | 0.1437 | 0.1437 |
| P | 13.206 ±5.143 | 0.0367* | 0.0122* |
| Na | 1.434 ±1.847 | 0.8340 | 0.8340 |
| Cl | 1.074 ±1.341 | 0.5309 | 0.1425 |
| Mg | 0.494 ±0.289 | 0.6761 | 0.4034 |
| O | 48.656 ±12.147 | 0.6761 | 0.6761 |
Mass content of elements in macroscopically unchanged enamel
| Chemical element | Patients after chemotherapy | Controls |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| (group 1) | (group 2) | ||
| Ca | 34.676 ±0.744 | 35.560 ±0.283 | 0.0601 |
| P | 19.926 ±1.898 | 20.990 ±0.166 | 0.2101 |
| Na | 0.790 ±0.261 | 0.770 ±0.125 | 0.5309 |
| Cl | 0.634 ±0.127 | 0.758 ±0.073 | 0.0937 |
| Mg | 0.302 ±0.215 | 0.224 ±0.127 | 0.5284 |
| O | 41.498 ±0.486 | 41.470 ±0.265 | 0.8345 |
Fig. 3Enamel spectrogram of teeth in patients after chemotherapy, indicating the prevalence of trace elements: F, Zn (A), and Si (B)
Mass percent of elements in dentine
| Chemical element | Patients after chemotherapy | Controls |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| (group 1) | (group 2) | ||
| Ca | 36.288 ±1.574 | 36.104 ±0.877 | 0.8345 |
| P | 20.062 ±0.547 | 20.304 ±0.266 | 0.5309 |
| Na | 0.908 ±0.350 | 0.838 ±0.294 | 0.6761 |
| Cl | 0.138 ±0.171 | - | 0.1797 |
| Mg | 0.842 ±0.453 | 1.048 ±0.281 | 0.4034 |
| O | 41.424 ±0.355 | 41.640 ±0.226 | 0.4633 |
Mass percent of elements on cementum surface
| Chemical element | Patients after chemotherapy | Controls |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| (group 1) | (group 2) | ||
| Ca | 32.936 ±14.143 | 34.242 ±2.437 | 0.6974 |
| P | 14.472 ±6.211 | 19.482 ±1.002 | 0.2963 |
| Na | 1.016 ±0.643 | 2.058 ±1.143 | 0.2963 |
| Cl | 0.386 ±0.355 | - | 0.0720 |
| Mg | 0.700 ±0.368 | 1.428 ±0.463 | 0.0947 |
| O | 45.228 ±10.646 | 41.852 ±0.444 | 0.6761 |
Fig. 4Cementum spectrogram of tooth in patient after chemotherapy, indicating the prevalence of sulphur (S)
Mass percent of elements on the interior surface of the canal
| Chemical element | Patients after chemotherapy | Controls |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| (group 1) | (group 2) | ||
| Ca | 26.870 ±9.839 | 33.420 ±2.789 | 0.4034 |
| P | 17.472 ±6.247 | 19.528 ±0.698 | 0.8345 |
| Na | 1.326 ±1.192 | 1.594 ±0.873 | 0.4034 |
| Cl | 0.214 ±0.265 | - | 0.1797 |
| Mg | 1.444 ±0.897 | 5.320 ±7.106 | 0.2492 |
| O | 46.106 ±8.916 | 42.236 ±0.755 | 0.8345 |