| Literature DB >> 24133648 |
Elnaz Ghadimi1, Hazem Eimar, Benedetto Marelli, Showan N Nazhat, Masoud Asgharian, Hojatollah Vali, Faleh Tamimi.
Abstract
In previous studies, we showed that the size of apatite nanocrystals in tooth enamel can influence its physical properties. This important discovery raised a new question; which factors are regulating the size of these nanocrystals? Trace elements can affect crystallographic properties of synthetic apatite, therefore this study was designed to investigate how trace elements influence enamel's crystallographic properties and ultimately its physical properties. The concentration of trace elements in tooth enamel was determined for 38 extracted human teeth using inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES). The following trace elements were detected: Al, K, Mg, S, Na, Zn, Si, B, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, Mo, Ni, Pb, Sb, Se and Ti. Simple and stepwise multiple regression was used to identify the correlations between trace elements concentration in enamel and its crystallographic structure, hardness, resistance to crack propagation, shade lightness and carbonate content. The presence of some trace elements in enamel was correlated with the size (Pb, Ti, Mn) and lattice parameters (Se, Cr, Ni) of apatite nanocrystals. Some trace elements such as Ti was significantly correlated with tooth crystallographic structure and consequently with hardness and shade lightness. We conclude that the presence of trace elements in enamel could influence its physical properties.Entities:
Keywords: Crystal domain size; Physical properties; Tooth enamel; Trace elements
Year: 2013 PMID: 24133648 PMCID: PMC3795877 DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-499
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
Summary of the literature on the effect of trace elements on crystallography parameters in synthetic HA
| Crystallographic parameters | Trace elements that increase crystallographic parameters | Trace elements that decrease crystallographic parameters |
|---|---|---|
| Lattice along a-axis | Fe2+, Fe3+, Zn2+a, Sr2+ | SiO4 4-, CO3 2-, Zn2+ b, Ti4+ |
| Lattice along c-axis | Fe2+, SiO4 4-, CO3 2-, Zn2+, Fe3+, Sr2+ | Mg2+, Ti4+, Co2+, Ni2+, Cr3+ |
| Crystallinity | Co2+, Ni2+, Cr3+ | SiO4 4-, CO3 2-, Zn2+, Fe3+, Ti4+, Mg2+, Ce3+ |
| Crystal domain size along c-axis | Co2+, Ni2+, Cr3+ | Fe2+, SiO4 4-, CO3 2-, Zn2+, Ti4+, Mg2+, Ce3+ |
a molar fraction >10%; b molar fraction < 10%.
Figure 1Frequency histograms describing the variations in physical-chemical properties of tooth enamel: cell lattice parameters along (a) a-axis and (b) c-axis; crystal domain length along (c) a-axis and (d) c-axis; (e) tooth shade lightness, (f) hardness and (g) average crack length; (h) the organic relative content and carbonate relative content [(i) type A and (j) type B] in enamel mineral matrix among the examined teeth.
Figure 2The concentration of trace elements. The figures show (a) the logarithm of trace elements concentration in tooth enamel and (b) the logarithm of tooth-to-body concentration ratio.
Figure 3The correlation between trace elements in tooth enamel. In scheme straight lines represent the positive correlations and dotted lines represent the negative ones. Differences in the size of circles are directly proportional to the concentration difference among the correlated elements.
Simple linear and stepwise multiple correlation between trace elements’ concentration in enamel and tooth properties
| Correlated properties | Correlated elements | Simple linear regression | Multiple stepwise regression | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | B | P | R | B | P | ||
| Mechanical properties | |||||||
| Hardness | Ti | 0.34 | 27.00 | 0.037 | 0.34 | 2753.54 | 0.037 |
| Average crack length | Al | 0.67 | −18.08 | 0.005 | 0.70 | −18.08 | 0.005 |
| Optical properties | |||||||
| Lightness | Fe | 0.46 | 153.60 | 0.004 | NS | NS | NS |
| ˶ | Ti | 0.47 | 832.79 | 0.003 | 0.47 | 832.79 | 0.003 |
| Crystallographic structure | |||||||
| Crystal domain size along a-axis | Cu | 0.40 | 32.87 | 0.019 | NS | NS | NS |
| Crystal domain size along c-axis | Pb | 0.52 | −199.11 | 0.002 | 0.70 | −138.76 | 0.019 |
| ˶ | Ti | 0.51 | −192.05 | 0.002 | ˶ | −133.19 | 0.02 |
| ˶ | Mn | NS | NS | NS | ˶ | 184.01 | 0.025 |
| Cell lattice parameter along a-axis | Cu | 0.35 | 0.24 | 0.045 | NS | NS | NS |
| ˶ | Se | 0.59 | 0.36 | <0.001 | 0.59 | 0.36 | <0.001 |
| Cell lattice parameter along c-axis | Cr | 0.38 | −6.97 | 0.031 | 0.72 | −5.79 | 0.031 |
| ˶ | Ni | 0.40 | −0.09 | 0.02 | ˶ | −0.06 | 0.047 |
| ˶ | Se | 0.52 | 0.35 | 0.002 | ˶ | 0.36 | <0.001 |
| Carbonate Content | |||||||
| Type A | Fe | 0.41 | −0.61 | 0.021 | 0.41 | −0.61 | 0.021 |
| Type B | Co | 0.37 | −18.44 | 0.007 | 0.77 | −16.15 | 0.011 |
| ˶ | Ni | 0.70 | 0.47 | <0.001 | ˶ | 0.46 | <0.001 |
| ˶ | S | 0.43 | 0.01 | 0.014 | NS | NS | NS |
R: the correlation coefficient; B: the regression coefficient; P: the significance of Pearson correlation and NS: not significant.
Figure 4XRD, FTIR spectrums and SEM micrograph of Vicker’s microindentation on tooth enamel samples. (a) XRD spectrum of tooth enamel powder, (b) FTIR absorbance spectra of tooth enamel samples normalized to absorbance peak of ν3PO4 at 1013 cm-1(arrows show the peaks that used for the calculation of carbonate content), (c) SEM micrograph of Vicker’s microindentation on enamel (cracks are shown by arrows on the corners of indentation).