OBJECTIVE: This study intended to establish a droplet digital PCR (dd-PCR) for monitoring minimal residual disease (MRD) in patients with BCR/ABL (P210)-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), thereby achieving deep-level monitoring of tumor load and determining the efficacy for guided clinically individualized treatment. METHODS: Using dd-PCR and RT-qPCR, two cell suspensions were obtained from K562 cells and normal peripheral blood mononuclear cells by gradient dilution and were measured at the cellular level. At peripheral blood (PB) level, 61 cases with CML-chronic phase (CML-CP) were obtained after tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment and regular follow-ups. By RT-qPCR, BCR/ABL (P210) fusion gene was undetectable in PB after three successive analyses, which were performed once every 3 months. At the same time, dd-PCR was performed simultaneously with the last equal amount of cDNA. Ten CML patients with MR4.5 were followed up by the two methods. RESULTS: At the cellular level, consistency of results of dd-PCR and RT-qPCR reached R2 ≥ 0.99, with conversion equation of Y = 33.148X1.222 (Y: dd-PCR results; X: RT-qPCR results). In the dd-PCR test, 11 of the 61 patients with CML (18.03%) tested positive and showed statistically significant difference (P < .01). In the follow-up of 10 CML patients who were in MR4.5. All patients were loss of MR4.0, and 4 were tested positive by dd-PCR 3 months earlier than by RT-qPCR. CONCLUSION: In contrast with RT-qPCR, dd-PCR is more sensitive, thus enabling accurate conversion of dd-PCR results into internationally standard RT-qPCR results by conversion equation, to achieve a deeper molecular biology-based stratification of BCR/ABL(P210) MRD. It has some reference value to monitor disease progression in clinic.
OBJECTIVE: This study intended to establish a droplet digital PCR (dd-PCR) for monitoring minimal residual disease (MRD) in patients with BCR/ABL (P210)-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), thereby achieving deep-level monitoring of tumor load and determining the efficacy for guided clinically individualized treatment. METHODS: Using dd-PCR and RT-qPCR, two cell suspensions were obtained from K562 cells and normal peripheral blood mononuclear cells by gradient dilution and were measured at the cellular level. At peripheral blood (PB) level, 61 cases with CML-chronic phase (CML-CP) were obtained after tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment and regular follow-ups. By RT-qPCR, BCR/ABL (P210) fusion gene was undetectable in PB after three successive analyses, which were performed once every 3 months. At the same time, dd-PCR was performed simultaneously with the last equal amount of cDNA. Ten CMLpatients with MR4.5 were followed up by the two methods. RESULTS: At the cellular level, consistency of results of dd-PCR and RT-qPCR reached R2 ≥ 0.99, with conversion equation of Y = 33.148X1.222 (Y: dd-PCR results; X: RT-qPCR results). In the dd-PCR test, 11 of the 61 patients with CML (18.03%) tested positive and showed statistically significant difference (P < .01). In the follow-up of 10 CMLpatients who were in MR4.5. All patients were loss of MR4.0, and 4 were tested positive by dd-PCR 3 months earlier than by RT-qPCR. CONCLUSION: In contrast with RT-qPCR, dd-PCR is more sensitive, thus enabling accurate conversion of dd-PCR results into internationally standard RT-qPCR results by conversion equation, to achieve a deeper molecular biology-based stratification of BCR/ABL(P210) MRD. It has some reference value to monitor disease progression in clinic.
Authors: Christian Dide-Agossou; Karen Rossmassler; Justin Reid; Juhi Purohit; Rada M Savic; Payam Nahid; Patrick P J Phillips; Camille M Moore; Nicholas D Walter Journal: J Pharm Biomed Anal Date: 2022-02-16 Impact factor: 3.571
Authors: Hee Jung Chung; Mina Hur; Sumi Yoon; Keumrock Hwang; Hwan Sub Lim; Hanah Kim; Hee Won Moon; Yeo Min Yun Journal: Ann Lab Med Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Petra Kövy; Zoltán Őrfi; András Bors; András Kozma; László Gopcsa; János Dolgos; Nóra Lovas; József Harasztdombi; Viktor Lakatos; Ágnes Király; Gábor Mikala; István Vályi-Nagy; Péter Reményi; Hajnalka Andrikovics Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-06-21 Impact factor: 3.752