Literature DB >> 31662567

Use of Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction for Detecting Minimal Residual Disease: A Prospective Multi-Institutional Study.

Hyunkyung Park1,2, Dong-Yeop Shin1, Inho Kim3, Sang-Kyun Sohn4, Youngil Koh1, Je-Hwan Lee5, Kyoo-Hyung Lee5, Dae-Young Kim5, Hyeong-Joon Kim6, Jae-Sook Ahn6, Jeong-Ok Lee7, Soo-Mee Bang7, June-Won Cheong8, Sang-Gon Park9, Seonyang Park1,10, Yoo Jin Lee11, Seo-Yeon Ahn6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) is an exact method of measuring nucleic acids. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate minimal residual disease (MRD) using ddPCR in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between May 2013 and November 2014, CML patients treated with nilotinib were enrolled in our study. BCR/ABL1 transcripts levels were evaluated using ddPCR at the first time of complete molecular response (CMR). We enrolled 15 patients from 7 Institutions. The treatment period and median follow-up period were 45 months and 47 months, respectively.
RESULTS: Patients with a high level of BCR/ABL1 transcript had a greater tendency to lose the CMR during the follow-up period (p=0.095). In addition, patients with a low level of BCR/ABL1 transcript showed a longer duration of CMR compared to those with a high level (p=0.032).
CONCLUSION: We found that ddPCR is a sensitive method for detecting MRD and that MRD could affect the duration of the treatment response. Copyright
© 2019, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic myeloid leukemia; complete molecular response; droplet digital polymerase chain reaction; minimal residual disease; treatment outcome

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31662567      PMCID: PMC6899155          DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11733

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  In Vivo        ISSN: 0258-851X            Impact factor:   2.155


  30 in total

1.  Level of minimal residual disease after consolidation therapy predicts outcome in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  A Venditti; F Buccisano; G Del Poeta; L Maurillo; A Tamburini; C Cox; A Battaglia; G Catalano; B Del Moro; L Cudillo; M Postorino; M Masi; S Amadori
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Major molecular response in CML patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: the paradigm for monitoring targeted cancer therapy.

Authors:  Richard D Press
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2010-06-21

3.  Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

Authors:  M M Oken; R H Creech; D C Tormey; J Horton; T E Davis; E T McFadden; P P Carbone
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.339

Review 4.  How I monitor residual disease in chronic myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Jerald P Radich
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab treatment achieves long-term disease-free survival in IGHV-mutated chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Philip A Thompson; Constantine S Tam; Susan M O'Brien; William G Wierda; Francesco Stingo; William Plunkett; Susan C Smith; Hagop M Kantarjian; Emil J Freireich; Michael J Keating
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Deep molecular response is reached by the majority of patients treated with imatinib, predicts survival, and is achieved more quickly by optimized high-dose imatinib: results from the randomized CML-study IV.

Authors:  Rüdiger Hehlmann; Martin C Müller; Michael Lauseker; Benjamin Hanfstein; Alice Fabarius; Annette Schreiber; Ulrike Proetel; Nadine Pletsch; Markus Pfirrmann; Claudia Haferlach; Susanne Schnittger; Hermann Einsele; Jolanta Dengler; Christiane Falge; Lothar Kanz; Andreas Neubauer; Michael Kneba; Frank Stegelmann; Michael Pfreundschuh; Cornelius F Waller; Karsten Spiekermann; Gabriela M Baerlocher; Gerhard Ehninger; Dominik Heim; Hermann Heimpel; Christoph Nerl; Stefan W Krause; Dieter K Hossfeld; Hans-Jochem Kolb; Joerg Hasford; Susanne Saußele; Andreas Hochhaus
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Next Generation Flow for highly sensitive and standardized detection of minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  J Flores-Montero; L Sanoja-Flores; B Paiva; N Puig; O García-Sánchez; S Böttcher; V H J van der Velden; J-J Pérez-Morán; M-B Vidriales; R García-Sanz; C Jimenez; M González; J Martínez-López; A Corral-Mateos; G-E Grigore; R Fluxá; R Pontes; J Caetano; L Sedek; M-C Del Cañizo; J Bladé; J-J Lahuerta; C Aguilar; A Bárez; A García-Mateo; J Labrador; P Leoz; C Aguilera-Sanz; J San-Miguel; M-V Mateos; B Durie; J J M van Dongen; A Orfao
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 11.528

8.  Droplet digital PCR for detection and quantification of circulating tumor DNA in plasma of head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Joost H van Ginkel; Manon M H Huibers; Robert J J van Es; Remco de Bree; Stefan M Willems
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  A phase 4 study of nilotinib in Korean patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: ENESTKorea.

Authors:  Junghoon Shin; Youngil Koh; Seo Hyun Yoon; Joo-Youn Cho; Dae-Young Kim; Kyoo-Hyung Lee; Hyeong-Joon Kim; Jae-Sook Ahn; Yeo-Kyeoung Kim; Jinny Park; Sang-Kyun Sohn; Joon Ho Moon; Yoo Jin Lee; Seonghae Yoon; Jeong-Ok Lee; June-Won Cheong; Kyoung Ha Kim; Sung-Hyun Kim; Hoon-Gu Kim; Hawk Kim; Seung-Hyun Nam; Young Rok Do; Sang-Gon Park; Seong Kyu Park; Sung Hwa Bae; Hun Ho Song; Dong-Yeop Shin; Doyeun Oh; Min Kyoung Kim; Chul Won Jung; Seonyang Park; Inho Kim
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2018-03-25       Impact factor: 4.452

10.  Comparison of Droplet Digital PCR and qPCR for the Quantification of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli in Bovine Feces.

Authors:  Bavo Verhaegen; Koen De Reu; Lieven De Zutter; Karen Verstraete; Marc Heyndrickx; Els Van Coillie
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 4.546

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Digital PCR: A Reliable Tool for Analyzing and Monitoring Hematologic Malignancies.

Authors:  Nicoletta Coccaro; Giuseppina Tota; Luisa Anelli; Antonella Zagaria; Giorgina Specchia; Francesco Albano
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 5.923

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.