Allison L Phillips1, Stephanie C Hammel2, Kate Hoffman3, Amelia M Lorenzo4, Albert Chen5, Thomas F Webster6, Heather M Stapleton7. 1. Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States. Electronic address: allison.l.phillips@duke.edu. 2. Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States. Electronic address: stephanie.hammel@duke.edu. 3. Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States. Electronic address: kate.hoffman@duke.edu. 4. Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States. Electronic address: amelia.lorenzo@duke.edu. 5. Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States. 6. Boston University School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States. Electronic address: twebster@bu.edu. 7. Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States. Electronic address: heather.stapleton@duke.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Following the phase-out of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), organophosphate esters (OPEs) have been increasingly used in consumer products and building materials for their flame retardant and plasticizing properties. As a result, human exposure to these chemicals is widespread as evidenced by common detection of their metabolites in urine. However, little is known about the major exposure pathways, or factors that influence children's exposure to OPEs. Furthermore, little data is available on exposure to the novel aryl OPEs. OBJECTIVES: To examine predictors of children's internal exposure, we assessed relationships between OPEs in house dust and on hand wipes and levels of their corresponding metabolites in paired urine samples (n = 181). We also examined associations between urinary metabolites and potential covariates, including child's age and sex, mother's educational attainment and race, and average outdoor air temperature. METHODS: Children aged 3 to 6 years provided urine and hand wipe samples. Mothers or legal guardians completed questionnaires, and a house dust sample was taken from the main living area during home visits. Alkyl chlorinated and aryl OPEs were measured in dust and hand wipes, and composite urine samples were analyzed for several metabolites. RESULTS: Tris(2-chloroethyl) phosphate (TCEP), tris(2-chloroisopropyl) phosphate (TCIPP), tris(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate (TDCIPP), 2-ethylhexyl diphenyl phosphate (EHDPHP), triphenyl phosphate (TPHP), and 2-isopropylphenyl diphenyl phosphate (2IPPDPP) were detected frequently in hand wipes and dust (>80%), indicating that these compounds were near-ubiquitous in indoor environments. Additionally, bis(1-chloro-2-propyl) 1-hydroxy-2-propyl phosphate (BCIPHIPP), bis(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate (BDCIPP), diphenyl phosphate (DPHP), mono-isopropyl phenyl phenyl phosphate (ip-PPP), and mono-tert-butyl phenyl phenyl phosphate (tb-PPP) were detected in >94% of tested urine samples, signifying that TESIE participants were widely exposed to OPEs. Contrary to PBDEs, house dust OPE concentrations were generally not correlated with urinary OPE metabolite levels; however, hand wipe levels of OPEs were associated with internal dose. For example, children with the highest mass of TDCIPP on hand wipes had BDCIPP levels that were 2.73 times those of participants with the lowest levels (95% CI: 1.67, 4.48, p < 0.0001). Of the variables examined, hand wipe level was the most consistent and strongest predictor of OPE urinary metabolite concentrations. Outdoor air temperature was also a significant predictor of urinary BDCIPP concentrations, with a 1 °C increase in temperature corresponding to a 4% increase in urinary BDCIPP (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: OPE exposures are highly prevalent, and data provided herein further substantiate hand-to-mouth contact and dermal absorption as important pathways of OPE exposure, especially for young children.
BACKGROUND: Following the phase-out of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), organophosphate esters (OPEs) have been increasingly used in consumer products and building materials for their flame retardant and plasticizing properties. As a result, human exposure to these chemicals is widespread as evidenced by common detection of their metabolites in urine. However, little is known about the major exposure pathways, or factors that influence children's exposure to OPEs. Furthermore, little data is available on exposure to the novel aryl OPEs. OBJECTIVES: To examine predictors of children's internal exposure, we assessed relationships between OPEs in house dust and on hand wipes and levels of their corresponding metabolites in paired urine samples (n = 181). We also examined associations between urinary metabolites and potential covariates, including child's age and sex, mother's educational attainment and race, and average outdoor air temperature. METHODS:Children aged 3 to 6 years provided urine and hand wipe samples. Mothers or legal guardians completed questionnaires, and a house dust sample was taken from the main living area during home visits. Alkyl chlorinated and aryl OPEs were measured in dust and hand wipes, and composite urine samples were analyzed for several metabolites. RESULTS:Tris(2-chloroethyl) phosphate (TCEP), tris(2-chloroisopropyl) phosphate (TCIPP), tris(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl)phosphate (TDCIPP), 2-ethylhexyl diphenyl phosphate (EHDPHP), triphenyl phosphate (TPHP), and 2-isopropylphenyl diphenyl phosphate (2IPPDPP) were detected frequently in hand wipes and dust (>80%), indicating that these compounds were near-ubiquitous in indoor environments. Additionally, bis(1-chloro-2-propyl) 1-hydroxy-2-propyl phosphate (BCIPHIPP), bis(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate (BDCIPP), diphenyl phosphate (DPHP), mono-isopropyl phenyl phenyl phosphate (ip-PPP), and mono-tert-butyl phenyl phenyl phosphate (tb-PPP) were detected in >94% of tested urine samples, signifying that TESIE participants were widely exposed to OPEs. Contrary to PBDEs, house dust OPE concentrations were generally not correlated with urinary OPE metabolite levels; however, hand wipe levels of OPEs were associated with internal dose. For example, children with the highest mass of TDCIPP on hand wipes had BDCIPP levels that were 2.73 times those of participants with the lowest levels (95% CI: 1.67, 4.48, p < 0.0001). Of the variables examined, hand wipe level was the most consistent and strongest predictor of OPE urinary metabolite concentrations. Outdoor air temperature was also a significant predictor of urinary BDCIPP concentrations, with a 1 °C increase in temperature corresponding to a 4% increase in urinary BDCIPP (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS:OPE exposures are highly prevalent, and data provided herein further substantiate hand-to-mouth contact and dermal absorption as important pathways of OPE exposure, especially for young children.
Authors: Fuchao Xu; Georgios Giovanoulis; Sofie van Waes; Juan Antonio Padilla-Sanchez; Eleni Papadopoulou; Jorgen Magnér; Line Småstuen Haug; Hugo Neels; Adrian Covaci Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2016-07-11 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Nele Van den Eede; Amy L Heffernan; Lesa L Aylward; Peter Hobson; Hugo Neels; Jochen F Mueller; Adrian Covaci Journal: Environ Int Date: 2014-09-29 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Heather M Stapleton; Susan Klosterhaus; Sarah Eagle; Jennifer Fuh; John D Meeker; Arlene Blum; Thomas F Webster Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2009-10-01 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Allison L Phillips; Stephanie C Hammel; Alex Konstantinov; Heather M Stapleton Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2017-11-13 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: A Araki; I Saito; A Kanazawa; K Morimoto; K Nakayama; E Shibata; M Tanaka; T Takigawa; T Yoshimura; H Chikara; Y Saijo; R Kishi Journal: Indoor Air Date: 2013-07-01 Impact factor: 5.770
Authors: Deborah J Watkins; Michael D McClean; Alicia J Fraser; Janice Weinberg; Heather M Stapleton; Andreas Sjödin; Thomas F Webster Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2011-06-30 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Christopher D Kassotis; Erin M Kollitz; Kate Hoffman; Julie Ann Sosa; Heather M Stapleton Journal: Sci Total Environ Date: 2019-02-18 Impact factor: 7.963
Authors: Brett T Doherty; Kate Hoffman; Alexander P Keil; Stephanie M Engel; Heather M Stapleton; Barbara D Goldman; Andrew F Olshan; Julie L Daniels Journal: Environ Res Date: 2018-10-30 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Arlene Blum; Mamta Behl; Linda Birnbaum; Miriam L Diamond; Allison Phillips; Veena Singla; Nisha S Sipes; Heather M Stapleton; Marta Venier Journal: Environ Sci Technol Lett Date: 2019-10-21
Authors: Mary E Ingle; Deborah Watkins; Zaira Rosario; Carmen M Vélez Vega; Gredia Huerta-Montanez; Antonia M Calafat; Maria Ospina; José F Cordero; Akram Alshawabkeh; John D Meeker Journal: Environ Res Date: 2019-09-23 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Jessica L Levasseur; Stephanie C Hammel; Kate Hoffman; Allison L Phillips; Sharon Zhang; Xiaoyun Ye; Antonia M Calafat; Thomas F Webster; Heather M Stapleton Journal: Environ Int Date: 2020-12-17 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Stephanie C Hammel; Jessica L Levasseur; Kate Hoffman; Allison L Phillips; Amelia M Lorenzo; Antonia M Calafat; Thomas F Webster; Heather M Stapleton Journal: Environ Int Date: 2019-08-07 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Mary E Ingle; Deborah Watkins; Zaira Rosario; Carmen M VélezVega; Antonia M Calafat; Maria Ospina; Kelly K Ferguson; José F Cordero; Akram Alshawabkeh; John D Meeker Journal: Sci Total Environ Date: 2019-11-04 Impact factor: 7.963
Authors: Allison L Phillips; Nicholas J Herkert; Jake C Ulrich; Jessica H Hartman; Matthew T Ruis; Ellen M Cooper; P Lee Ferguson; Heather M Stapleton Journal: Chem Res Toxicol Date: 2020-03-18 Impact factor: 3.739
Authors: Kylie D Rock; Genevieve St Armour; Brian Horman; Allison Phillips; Matthew Ruis; Allison K Stewart; Dereje Jima; David C Muddiman; Heather M Stapleton; Heather B Patisaul Journal: Toxicol Sci Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 4.849