Literature DB >> 29688040

Commentary ACOG Practice Bulletin July 2017: Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Screening in Average-Risk Women.

Victoria Mango1, Yolanda Bryce2, Elizabeth Anne Morris1, Elisabetta Gianotti1, Katja Pinker1,2.   

Abstract

Screening mammography reduces breast cancer mortality in average-risk women. However, adverse consequences include false-positive findings possibly leading to benign breast biopsies and patient anxiety. There is also potential for overdiagnosis and overtreatment. Differences in how to balance benefits and harms have led to varying recommendations by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, the American Cancer Society, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the American College of Radiology/Society of Breast Imaging. These recommendations differ with respect to what age to start, what age to stop, and frequency of screening in average-risk women. Most recently, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists have issued updated clinical management guidelines for breast cancer risk assessment and screening in average-risk women that aim to maximize the benefits of screening while keeping in mind the potential harms of false-positive results. This commentary summarizes the clinical management guidelines of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Practice Bulletin July 2017 for breast cancer risk assessment and screening in average-risk women. We review evidence of the benefits and adverse consequences of screening mammography and briefly discuss new advances in breast cancer screening with recent technologies such digital breast tomosynthesis and risk-adapted screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29688040      PMCID: PMC6350476          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  13 in total

1.  Radiation-Induced Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality From Digital Mammography Screening: A Modeling Study.

Authors:  Diana L Miglioretti; Jane Lange; Jeroen J van den Broek; Christoph I Lee; Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Dominique Ritley; Karla Kerlikowske; Joshua J Fenton; Joy Melnikow; Harry J de Koning; Rebecca A Hubbard
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 2.  Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review to Update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation.

Authors:  Heidi D Nelson; Miranda Pappas; Amy Cantor; Jessica Griffin; Monica Daeges; Linda Humphrey
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study.

Authors:  Stefano Ciatto; Nehmat Houssami; Daniela Bernardi; Francesca Caumo; Marco Pellegrini; Silvia Brunelli; Paola Tuttobene; Paola Bricolo; Carmine Fantò; Marvi Valentini; Stefania Montemezzi; Petra Macaskill
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Adjunct Screening With Tomosynthesis or Ultrasound in Women With Mammography-Negative Dense Breasts: Interim Report of a Prospective Comparative Trial.

Authors:  Alberto S Tagliafico; Massimo Calabrese; Giovanna Mariscotti; Manuela Durando; Simona Tosto; Francesco Monetti; Sonia Airaldi; Bianca Bignotti; Jacopo Nori; Antonella Bagni; Alessio Signori; Maria Pia Sormani; Nehmat Houssami
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Effect of mammographic screening from age 40 years on breast cancer mortality in the UK Age trial at 17 years' follow-up: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Sue M Moss; Christopher Wale; Robert Smith; Andrew Evans; Howard Cuckle; Stephen W Duffy
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography.

Authors:  Sarah M Friedewald; Elizabeth A Rafferty; Stephen L Rose; Melissa A Durand; Donna M Plecha; Julianne S Greenberg; Mary K Hayes; Debra S Copit; Kara L Carlson; Thomas M Cink; Lora D Barke; Linda N Greer; Dave P Miller; Emily F Conant
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  Benefits and Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Evan R Myers; Patricia Moorman; Jennifer M Gierisch; Laura J Havrilesky; Lars J Grimm; Sujata Ghate; Brittany Davidson; Ranee Chatterjee Mongtomery; Matthew J Crowley; Douglas C McCrory; Amy Kendrick; Gillian D Sanders
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Systematic review of 3D mammography for breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Robert Hodgson; Sylvia H Heywang-Köbrunner; Susan C Harvey; Mary Edwards; Javed Shaikh; Mick Arber; Julie Glanville
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 4.380

9.  Radiological and pathological findings of interval cancers in a multi-centre, randomized, controlled trial of mammographic screening in women from age 40-41 years.

Authors:  A J Evans; E Kutt; C Record; M Waller; L Bobrow; S Moss
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 2.350

Review 10.  The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  3 in total

1.  Testing a breast cancer prevention and a multiple disease prevention weight loss programme amongst women within the UK NHS breast screening programme-a randomised feasibility study.

Authors:  Michelle Harvie; David P French; Mary Pegington; Grace Cooper; Anthony Howell; Sarah McDiarmid; Cheryl Lombardelli; Louise Donnelly; Helen Ruane; Katharine Sellers; Emma Barrett; Christopher J Armitage; D Gareth Evans
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2021-12-20

2.  The association between rurality, sociodemographic characteristics, and mammogram screening outcomes among a sample of low-income uninsured women.

Authors:  Morgan Kassabian; Samson Olowolaju; Marvellous A Akinlotan; Anna Lichorad; Robert Pope; Brandon Williamson; Scott Horel; Jane N Bolin
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2021-11-18

Review 3.  Surgical Management of Hereditary Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Berger; Mehra Golshan
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 4.096

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.