| Literature DB >> 29682888 |
Gina R Webster1, Craig van Dolleweerd2, Thais Guerra1, Szymon Stelter1, Sven Hofmann1, Mi-Young Kim1, Audrey Y-H Teh1, Gil Reynolds Diogo1, Alastair Copland1, Mathew J Paul1, Peter Hart1, Rajko Reljic1, Julian K-C Ma1.
Abstract
In this study, a strategy based onEntities:
Keywords: Ag85B; FcγR; fusion protein; immune complex; plant biotechnology; tuberculosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29682888 PMCID: PMC6230950 DOI: 10.1111/pbi.12932
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plant Biotechnol J ISSN: 1467-7644 Impact factor: 9.803
Figure 1Design of TB‐PIGS. (a) Linearized map of gene sequence for TB‐PIGS. The main structural elements are indicated for both human and murine immunoglobulin‐based scaffolds with the amino acid substitutions highlighted. (b) Diagrammatic representation of TB‐PIGS ‘monomer’. Expected size of ~120 K, not including any glycosylation. Diagram is not to scale; Ag85B portion is ~30 K and truncated γ‐chain is ~30 K. (c) Diagrammatic representation of TB‐PIGS ‘polymer’. Expected size of ~720 K for hexamer, not including any glycosylation. There are potentially six glycosylation sites in one single chain: four within Ag85B nucleotide sequence and two within truncated γ‐chain. However, only two sites are predicted to be accessible for glycosylation to occur when protein is folded into 3D structure.
Figure 2Characterization of assembly and size of TB‐PIGS. In all cases, 4%–12% Bis‐Tris gels with MOPS buffer were used. ~5–10 μg of protein was loaded per well. (a) SDS‐PAGE of purified human and murine TB‐PIGS detected by Coomassie Blue staining. Human IgG1, IgM and murine IgG2a are shown as controls. Panels i‐ii are under nonreducing conditions; panels iii‐iv are under reducing conditions. (b) Western blotting—Panels i and iv show detection using α‐Ag85B antiserum under nonreducing and reducing conditions, respectively. Positive control is plant expressed Ag85B; negative control is an extract from a wild‐type Nicotiana benthamiana plant (W.T.). Samples are purified human (H) and murine (M) TB‐PIGS; panels ii and v show detection using α‐human IgG1 antiserum under nonreducing and reducing conditions, respectively. Positive control is commercial purified human IgG1; panels iii and vi show detection using α‐murine IgG2a antiserum under nonreducing and reducing conditions, respectively. Positive control is commercial purified murine IgG2a; P indicates polymer; M indicates monomer; and S indicates single chain size of TB‐PIGS. Molecular weight markers in K are indicated to the left of each gel. (c) Native PAGE of TB‐PIGS. A 3%–12% bis‐tris gel in dark blue cathode and anode buffer was used. Molecular size markers are indicated on right‐hand side of gel. P ~ polymer size; D ~ dimer size and M ~ monomer size. (d) Size exclusion chromatography‐ultraviolet spectrophotometry (SEC‐UV). Bio‐Rad Standards include (from right to left) 1.35 kDa Vitamin B12 (0.5 mg), 17 kDa Horse Myoglobin (2.5 mg), 44 kDa Chicken Ovalbumin (5 mg), 158 kDa Bovine γ‐globulin (5 mg) and 670 kDa Bovine Thyroglobulin (5 mg). A total volume of 20 μL was run for each sample. Human TB‐PIGS:ΔXF was run at a sample concentration of 100 μg/mL and yielded four peaks. Murine TB‐PIGS:ΔXF was run at a concentration of 100 μg/mL and yielded two peaks. Black numbers indicate the retention time of each peak.
Figure 3Functional characterization of TB‐PIGS in vitro. (a) Complement‐binding ELISA. ELISA plates were coated with 5 μg/mL human C1q. Positive control was ICMs (TBG65 and ACR). α‐Mse γ1‐HRP was used as detection antibody. Human TB‐PIGS and HuIgG1 control were detected using α‐Huγ1 antiserum. Murine TB‐PIGS and MseIgG2a control were detected using α‐Mseγ2a antiserum. (b) SPR analysis of avidity interaction between glyco‐engineered human TB‐PIGS and human CD32a. 1 μM of human TB‐PIGS:ΔXF or HuIgG1 was passed over the His‐captured human CD32a. (c) Avidity analysis between glyco‐engineered human TB‐PIGS and human CD16a. 540 nM of human TB‐PIGS:ΔXF or HuIgG1 was passed over the His‐captured human CD16a.
Figure 4Confocal microscopy of THP1 cells with human TB‐PIGS:ΔXF. Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue); Ag85B was detected with rabbit α‐Ag85B antiserum and goat α‐rabbit Ig‐Alexa Fluor 488 (green); HuIgG γ‐chain was detected with sheep α‐HuIgG1 antiserum and donkey α‐sheep IgG‐Alexa Fluor 633 (magenta). Superimposed images are shown (far right). In descending order, samples incubated with cells were; media only, isotype control (rabbit IgG‐Alexa Fluor 488), HuIgG1 and human TB‐PIGS:ΔXF.
Figure 5In vivo study of murine TB‐PIGS in BALB/c mice. (a) Ag85B‐specific IgG responses. Three weeks after last immunization, three mice were culled per group, and serum was obtained. ELISA plates were coated with Ag85B, and mean (±SEM) are depicted for total Ag85b‐specific IgG responses (top), IgG1‐specific response (middle) and IgG2a‐specific response (bottom). (b) Polyfunctional CD4+ T‐cell responses. Splenocytes were stimulated with Ag85B and stained for four different cytokines (IFN‐γ, IL‐2, IL‐17 and TNF‐α). Analysis of the percentage of positive CD4+ T cells for each cytokine alone and in combination was determined and represented in pie charts (top). The total percentage of cells out of the events counted (before gating) are listed under each pie charts. (c) Polyfunctional CD8+ T‐cell responses. As for (b) but for CD8+ cells. (d) Mycobacterium tuberculosis challenge and tissue colonization. Extracts of lungs (left) and spleens (right) were plated out at three different dilutions per mouse, incubated for 3 weeks and the number of mycobacterial colonies counted. Mean (±SEM) are plotted per group. A one‐way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test was performed to determine statistical significance.
Figure 6In vivo study of human TB‐PIGS in transgenic CD64 mice. (a) α‐Ag85B‐specific IgG responses. Three weeks after last immunization, three mice were culled per group and serum was obtained. ELISA plates were coated with Ag85B and mean (±SEM) are depicted for total IgG responses (top), IgG1‐specific response (middle) and IgG2a‐specific response (bottom). (b) Cytokine response. Splenocytes were stimulated with Ag85B, and levels of four different cytokines, in the supernatant, were determined by ELISA. A one‐way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test was performed to determine statistical significance.
Figure 7In vivo study of human TB‐PIGS in transgenic CD64 mice. (a) Polyfunctional CD4+ T‐cell responses. Splenocytes were stimulated with Ag85B and stained for four different cytokines (IFN‐γ, IL‐2, IL‐17 and TNF‐α). Analysis of the percentage of positive CD4+ T cells for each cytokine alone and in combination was determined and represented in pie charts (top). The total percentage of cells out of the events counted (before gating) are listed under the pie charts. (b) Polyfunctional CD8+ T‐cell responses. As for (a) but for CD8+ cells. (c) Protective efficacy of human TB‐PIGS against challenge with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Extracts of lungs (left) and spleens (right) were plated out at three different dilutions per mouse and incubated for 3 weeks, and then, the number of mycobacterial colonies counted. Mean (±SEM) are plotted per group.