Literature DB >> 29681336

Response Expectancy and the Placebo Effect.

Irving Kirsch1.   

Abstract

In this chapter, I review basic tenets of response expectancy theory (Kirsch, 1985), beginning with the important distinction between response expectancies and stimulus expectancies. Although both can affect experience, the effects of response expectancies are stronger and more resistant to extinction than those of stimulus expectancies. Further, response expectancies are especially important to understanding placebo effects. The response expectancy framework is consistent with and has been amplified by the Bayesian model of predictive coding. Clinical implications of these phenomena are exemplified.
© 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Automaticity; Placebo effects; Predictive coding; Response expectancy; Stimulus expectancy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29681336     DOI: 10.1016/bs.irn.2018.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Rev Neurobiol        ISSN: 0074-7742            Impact factor:   3.230


  20 in total

1.  Influence of pain anticipation on brain activity and pain perception in Gulf War Veterans with chronic musculoskeletal pain.

Authors:  Jacob B Lindheimer; Aaron J Stegner; Laura D Ellingson-Sayen; Stephanie M Van Riper; Ryan J Dougherty; Michael J Falvo; Dane B Cook
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 2.  Applications of dynamic functional connectivity to pain and its modulation.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Necka; In-Seon Lee; Aaron Kucyi; Joshua C Cheng; Qingbao Yu; Lauren Y Atlas
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2019-08-07

3.  Advancing the understanding of placebo effects in psychological outcomes of exercise: Lessons learned and future directions.

Authors:  Jacob B Lindheimer; Attila Szabo; John S Raglin; Chris Beedie
Journal:  Eur J Sport Sci       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 4.050

4.  Validating a biosignature-predicting placebo pill response in chronic pain in the settings of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Etienne Vachon-Presseau; Taha B Abdullah; Sara E Berger; Lejian Huang; James W Griffith; Thomas J Schnitzer; A Vania Apkarian
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 7.926

Review 5.  Using Artificial Intelligence-based Methods to Address the Placebo Response in Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Erica A Smith; William P Horan; Dominique Demolle; Peter Schueler; Dong-Jing Fu; Ariana E Anderson; Joseph Geraci; Florence Butlen-Ducuing; Jasmine Link; Ni A Khin; Robert Morlock; Larry D Alphs
Journal:  Innov Clin Neurosci       Date:  2022 Jan-Mar

6.  Who are the placebo responders? A cross-sectional cohort study for psychological determinants.

Authors:  Yang Wang; Esther Chan; Susan G Dorsey; Claudia M Campbell; Luana Colloca
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 7.926

Review 7.  Clinical Use of Placebo Effects in Patients With Pain Disorders.

Authors:  Regine Klinger; Julia Stuhlreyer; Marie Schwartz; Julia Schmitz; Luana Colloca
Journal:  Int Rev Neurobiol       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 3.230

8.  Placebos without deception reduce self-report and neural measures of emotional distress.

Authors:  Darwin A Guevarra; Jason S Moser; Tor D Wager; Ethan Kross
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Placebo From an Enactive Perspective.

Authors:  Iñigo R Arandia; Ezequiel A Di Paolo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-02

Review 10.  Putting the 'Art' Into the 'Art of Medicine': The Under-Explored Role of Artifacts in Placebo Studies.

Authors:  Michael H Bernstein; Cosima Locher; Tobias Kube; Sarah Buergler; Sif Stewart-Ferrer; Charlotte Blease
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-07-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.