Literature DB >> 34433773

Validating a biosignature-predicting placebo pill response in chronic pain in the settings of a randomized controlled trial.

Etienne Vachon-Presseau1,2,3, Taha B Abdullah4, Sara E Berger5, Lejian Huang4, James W Griffith6, Thomas J Schnitzer7,8, A Vania Apkarian4,8,9.   

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The objective of this study is to validate a placebo pill response predictive model-a biosignature-that classifies chronic pain patients into placebo responders (predicted-PTxResp) and nonresponders (predicted-PTxNonR) and test whether it can dissociate placebo and active treatment responses. The model, based on psychological and brain functional connectivity, was derived in our previous study and blindly applied to current trial participants. Ninety-four chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients were classified into predicted-PTxResp or predicted-PTxNonR and randomized into no treatment, placebo treatment, or naproxen treatment. To monitor analgesia, back pain intensity was collected twice a day: 3 weeks baseline, 6 weeks of treatment, and 3 weeks of washout. Eighty-nine CLBP patients were included in the intent-to-treat analyses and 77 CLBP patients in the per-protocol analyses. Both analyses showed similar results. At the group level, the predictive model performed remarkably well, dissociating the separate effect sizes of pure placebo response and pure active treatment response and demonstrating that these effects interacted additively. Pain relief was about 15% stronger in the predicted-PTxResp compared with the predicted-PTxNonR receiving either placebo or naproxen, and the predicted-PTxNonR successfully isolated the active drug effect. At a single subject level, the biosignature better predicted placebo nonresponders, with poor accuracy. One component of the biosignature (dorsolateral prefrontal cortex-precentral gyrus functional connectivity) could be generalized across 3 placebo studies and in 2 different cohorts-CLBP and osteoarthritis pain patients. This study shows that a biosignature can predict placebo response at a group level in the setting of a randomized controlled trial.
Copyright © 2021 International Association for the Study of Pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34433773      PMCID: PMC8863986          DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   7.926


  65 in total

1.  Response variability to analgesics: a role for non-specific activation of endogenous opioids.

Authors:  Martina Amanzio; Antonella Pollo; Giuliano Maggi; Fabrizio Benedetti
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 6.961

2.  The role of conditioning and verbal expectancy in the placebo response.

Authors:  Nicholas J Voudouris; Connie L Peck; Grahame Coleman
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 6.961

3.  Rewarded placebo analgesia: A new mechanism of placebo effects based on operant conditioning.

Authors:  Wacław M Adamczyk; Karolina Wiercioch-Kuzianik; Elżbieta A Bajcar; Przemysław Bąbel
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.931

Review 4.  COX-dependent mechanisms involved in the antinociceptive action of NSAIDs at central and peripheral sites.

Authors:  Maria Burian; Gerd Geisslinger
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2005-04-19       Impact factor: 12.310

5.  The contributions of suggestion, desire, and expectation to placebo effects in irritable bowel syndrome patients. An empirical investigation.

Authors:  Lene Vase; Michael E Robinson; G Nicholas Verne; Donald D Price
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.961

6.  Placebo analgesia induced by social observational learning.

Authors:  Luana Colloca; Fabrizio Benedetti
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  German Acupuncture Trials (GERAC) for chronic low back pain: randomized, multicenter, blinded, parallel-group trial with 3 groups.

Authors:  Michael Haake; Hans-Helge Müller; Carmen Schade-Brittinger; Heinz D Basler; Helmut Schäfer; Christoph Maier; Heinz G Endres; Hans J Trampisch; Albrecht Molsberger
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007-09-24

8.  Functional network architecture predicts psychologically mediated analgesia related to treatment in chronic knee pain patients.

Authors:  Javeria Ali Hashmi; Jian Kong; Rosa Spaeth; Sheraz Khan; Ted J Kaptchuk; Randy L Gollub
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  The efficacy of duloxetine, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and opioids in osteoarthritis: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Julie Myers; Ronald C Wielage; Baoguang Han; Karen Price; James Gahn; Marie-Ange Paget; Michael Happich
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Prescribing "placebo treatments": results of national survey of US internists and rheumatologists.

Authors:  Jon C Tilburt; Ezekiel J Emanuel; Ted J Kaptchuk; Farr A Curlin; Franklin G Miller
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-10-23
View more
  3 in total

1.  Chronic pain domains and their relationship to personality, abilities, and brain networks.

Authors:  Camila Bonin Pinto; Jannis Bielefeld; Joana Barroso; Byron Yip; Lejian Huang; Thomas Schnitzer; A Vania Apkarian
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 7.926

2.  What Is the Numerical Nature of Pain Relief?

Authors:  Andrew D Vigotsky; Siddharth R Tiwari; James W Griffith; A Vania Apkarian
Journal:  Front Pain Res (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-11-02

3.  On the Relationship Between Pain Variability and Relief in Randomized Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Siddharth R Tiwari; Andrew D Vigotsky; A Vania Apkarian
Journal:  Front Pain Res (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-04-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.