Literature DB >> 29680645

Influence of sampling technique and bedding type on the milk microbiota: Results of a pilot study.

S A Metzger1, L L Hernandez1, J H Skarlupka2, G Suen2, T M Walker1, P L Ruegg3.   

Abstract

The objective of this pilot study was to evaluate the influence of sampling technique and exposure to different bedding types on the milk microbiome of healthy primiparous cows. Primiparous Holstein cows (n = 20) with no history of clinical mastitis or monthly somatic cell counts >150,000 cells/mL were selected for this study. From each enrolled cow, a composite milk sample was aseptically collected from all 4 mammary quarters (individual quarter somatic cell counts <100,000 cells/mL), 1 individual quarter milk sample was collected using conventional aseptic technique, and 2 individual quarter milk samples were collected directly from the gland cistern using a needle and vacuum tube. All milk samples were cultured using standard milk microbiological techniques and DNA was extracted. Extracted DNA was subjected to PCR and next-generation sequencing for microbiota determination. All samples yielded relatively little total DNA. Amplification of PCR was successful in 45, 40, and 83% of composite, conventional, and cisternal samples, respectively. Bacteria were successfully cultured from 35% of composite milk samples but from none of the quarter milk samples collected using conventional or cisternal sampling techniques. Bacterial DNA sequences were assigned to operational taxonomic units (OTU) based on 97% sequence similarity, and bacterial richness and diversity were determined. Most samples were dominated by low-prevalence OTU and of the 4,051 identified OTU, only 14 were prevalent at more than 1% each. These included bacteria typically recovered from environmental sources. Chao richness was greatest in composite samples and was 636, 347, and 356 for composite, conventional quarter, and cisternal milk samples, respectively. Shannon diversity was similar among sample types and ranged from 3.88 (quarter) to 4.17 (composite). Richness and diversity did not differ by bedding type among cisternal samples, but the power of this pilot study was limited due to small sample size. Despite the small sample size, for milk samples collected from the gland cistern, overall bacterial community composition differed among bedding types. These results demonstrate that sampling technique and bedding type may be associated with the microbiota detected in bovine milk, and we suggest that these variables should be considered in designing and reporting studies about the milk microbiota.
Copyright © 2018 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA sequencing; dairy; milk microbiome; milk sampling

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29680645     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2017-14212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  19 in total

1.  Diversity and temporal dynamics of primate milk microbiomes.

Authors:  Carly R Muletz-Wolz; Naoko P Kurata; Elizabeth A Himschoot; Elizabeth S Wenker; Elizabeth A Quinn; Katie Hinde; Michael L Power; Robert C Fleischer
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 2.371

2.  Changes in bovine milk bacterial microbiome from healthy and subclinical mastitis affected animals of the Girolando, Gyr, Guzera, and Holstein breeds.

Authors:  Raphael S Steinberg; Lilian C Silva E Silva; Marcelo R de Souza; Ronaldo B Reis; Patrícia C L da Silva; Gustavo A Lacorte; Jacques R Nicoli; Elisabeth Neumann; Álvaro C Nunes
Journal:  Int Microbiol       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 3.097

3.  Evaluation of Contamination in Milk Samples Pooled From Independently Collected Quarters Within a Laboratory Setting.

Authors:  Chris J Dean; Felipe Peña-Mosca; Tui Ray; Bradley J Heins; Vinicius S Machado; Pablo J Pinedo; Luciano S Caixeta; Noelle R Noyes
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-06-16

4.  Amplicon-sequencing of raw milk microbiota: impact of DNA extraction and library-PCR.

Authors:  Annemarie Siebert; Katharina Hofmann; Lena Staib; Etienne V Doll; Siegfried Scherer; Mareike Wenning
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Relationship Between mRNA of Immune Factors Expressed by Milk Somatic Cells and Bacteria Present in Healthy Lactating Holstein Cows.

Authors:  Hiromichi Ohtsuka; Honami Hirose; Kenji Murakami; Ryo Murata; Toshihide Kato; Motoshi Tajima
Journal:  J Vet Res       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 1.744

6.  Mammary microbiome of lactating organic dairy cows varies by time, tissue site, and infection status.

Authors:  Tucker Andrews; Deborah A Neher; Thomas R Weicht; John W Barlow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Full-Length SSU rRNA Gene Sequencing Allows Species-Level Detection of Bacteria, Archaea, and Yeasts Present in Milk.

Authors:  Isabel Abellan-Schneyder; Annemarie Siebert; Katharina Hofmann; Mareike Wenning; Klaus Neuhaus
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-06-09

8.  Insights Into the Bovine Milk Microbiota in Dairy Farms With Different Incidence Rates of Subclinical Mastitis.

Authors:  Maoda Pang; Xing Xie; Hongduo Bao; Lichang Sun; Tao He; Hang Zhao; Yan Zhou; Lili Zhang; Hui Zhang; Ruicheng Wei; Kaizhou Xie; Ran Wang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Milk microbiome diversity and bacterial group prevalence in a comparison between healthy Holstein Friesian and Rendena cows.

Authors:  Paola Cremonesi; Camilla Ceccarani; Giulio Curone; Marco Severgnini; Claudia Pollera; Valerio Bronzo; Federica Riva; Maria Filippa Addis; Joel Filipe; Massimo Amadori; Erminio Trevisi; Daniele Vigo; Paolo Moroni; Bianca Castiglioni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A Cohort Study of the Milk Microbiota of Healthy and Inflamed Bovine Mammary Glands From Dryoff Through 150 Days in Milk.

Authors:  Stephanie A Metzger; Laura L Hernandez; Joseph H Skarlupka; Teresa M Walker; Garret Suen; Pamela L Ruegg
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-10-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.