Noa Malem-Shinitski1, Yingzhuo Zhang2, Daniel T Gray3, Sara N Burke4, Anne C Smith5, Carol A Barnes6, Demba Ba7. 1. Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Berlin, Germany; Department of Artificial Intelligence, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany. 2. John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA. Electronic address: yingzhuozhang@g.harvard.edu. 3. Evelyn F. McKnight Brain Institute, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA; Division of Neural Systems, Memory & Aging, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA. 4. Evelyn F. McKnight Brain Institute, Department of Neuroscience, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. 5. Evelyn F. McKnight Brain Institute, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA. 6. Evelyn F. McKnight Brain Institute, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA; Division of Neural Systems, Memory & Aging, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA; Department of Psychology, Neurology and Neuroscience, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA. 7. John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The study of learning in populations of subjects can provide insights into the changes that occur in the brain with aging, drug intervention, and psychiatric disease. NEW METHOD: We introduce a separable two-dimensional (2D) random field (RF) model for analyzing binary response data acquired during the learning of object-reward associations across multiple days. The method can quantify the variability of performance within a day and across days, and can capture abrupt changes in learning. RESULTS: We apply the method to data from young and aged macaque monkeys performing a reversal-learning task. The method provides an estimate of performance within a day for each age group, and a learning rate across days for each monkey. We find that, as a group, the older monkeys require more trials to learn the object discriminations than do the young monkeys, and that the cognitive flexibility of the younger group is higher. We also use the model estimates of performance as features for clustering the monkeys into two groups. The clustering results in two groups that, for the most part, coincide with those formed by the age groups. Simulation studies suggest that clustering captures inter-individual differences in performance levels. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S): In comparison with generalized linear models, this method is better able to capture the inherent two-dimensional nature of the data and find between group differences. CONCLUSIONS: Applied to binary response data from groups of individuals performing multi-day behavioral experiments, the model discriminates between-group differences and identifies subgroups.
BACKGROUND: The study of learning in populations of subjects can provide insights into the changes that occur in the brain with aging, drug intervention, and psychiatric disease. NEW METHOD: We introduce a separable two-dimensional (2D) random field (RF) model for analyzing binary response data acquired during the learning of object-reward associations across multiple days. The method can quantify the variability of performance within a day and across days, and can capture abrupt changes in learning. RESULTS: We apply the method to data from young and aged macaque monkeys performing a reversal-learning task. The method provides an estimate of performance within a day for each age group, and a learning rate across days for each monkey. We find that, as a group, the older monkeys require more trials to learn the object discriminations than do the young monkeys, and that the cognitive flexibility of the younger group is higher. We also use the model estimates of performance as features for clustering the monkeys into two groups. The clustering results in two groups that, for the most part, coincide with those formed by the age groups. Simulation studies suggest that clustering captures inter-individual differences in performance levels. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S): In comparison with generalized linear models, this method is better able to capture the inherent two-dimensional nature of the data and find between group differences. CONCLUSIONS: Applied to binary response data from groups of individuals performing multi-day behavioral experiments, the model discriminates between-group differences and identifies subgroups.
Authors: Gabriela Czanner; Uri T Eden; Sylvia Wirth; Marianna Yanike; Wendy A Suzuki; Emery N Brown Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2008-01-23 Impact factor: 2.714
Authors: Sara N Burke; Alex Thome; Kojo Plange; James R Engle; Theodore P Trouard; Katalin M Gothard; Carol A Barnes Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2014-07-23 Impact factor: 6.167