Literature DB >> 17182907

Bayesian analysis of interleaved learning and response bias in behavioral experiments.

Anne C Smith1, Sylvia Wirth, Wendy A Suzuki, Emery N Brown.   

Abstract

Accurate characterizations of behavior during learning experiments are essential for understanding the neural bases of learning. Whereas learning experiments often give subjects multiple tasks to learn simultaneously, most analyze subject performance separately on each individual task. This analysis strategy ignores the true interleaved presentation order of the tasks and cannot distinguish learning behavior from response preferences that may represent a subject's biases or strategies. We present a Bayesian analysis of a state-space model for characterizing simultaneous learning of multiple tasks and for assessing behavioral biases in learning experiments with interleaved task presentations. Under the Bayesian analysis the posterior probability densities of the model parameters and the learning state are computed using Monte Carlo Markov Chain methods. Measures of learning, including the learning curve, the ideal observer curve, and the learning trial translate directly from our previous likelihood-based state-space model analyses. We compare the Bayesian and current likelihood-based approaches in the analysis of a simulated conditioned T-maze task and of an actual object-place association task. Modeling the interleaved learning feature of the experiments along with the animal's response sequences allows us to disambiguate actual learning from response biases. The implementation of the Bayesian analysis using the WinBUGS software provides an efficient way to test different models without developing a new algorithm for each model. The new state-space model and the Bayesian estimation procedure suggest an improved, computationally efficient approach for accurately characterizing learning in behavioral experiments.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17182907     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00946.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  32 in total

1.  Associative learning rapidly establishes neuronal representations of upcoming behavioral choices in crows.

Authors:  Lena Veit; Galyna Pidpruzhnykova; Andreas Nieder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Probabilistic reinforcement learning in adults with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Marjorie Solomon; Anne C Smith; Michael J Frank; Stanford Ly; Cameron S Carter
Journal:  Autism Res       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 5.216

3.  Analysis of between-trial and within-trial neural spiking dynamics.

Authors:  Gabriela Czanner; Uri T Eden; Sylvia Wirth; Marianna Yanike; Wendy A Suzuki; Emery N Brown
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Comparison of associative learning-related signals in the macaque perirhinal cortex and hippocampus.

Authors:  Marianna Yanike; Sylvia Wirth; Anne C Smith; Emery N Brown; Wendy A Suzuki
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-10-20       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  A mixed filter algorithm for cognitive state estimation from simultaneously recorded continuous and binary measures of performance.

Authors:  M J Prerau; A C Smith; U T Eden; M Yanike; W A Suzuki; E N Brown
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2008-04-26       Impact factor: 2.086

6.  Characterizing learning by simultaneous analysis of continuous and binary measures of performance.

Authors:  M J Prerau; A C Smith; Uri T Eden; Y Kubota; M Yanike; W Suzuki; A M Graybiel; E N Brown
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  The Ageing Brain: Age-dependent changes in the electroencephalogram during propofol and sevoflurane general anaesthesia.

Authors:  P L Purdon; K J Pavone; O Akeju; A C Smith; A L Sampson; J Lee; D W Zhou; K Solt; E N Brown
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  Transitive inference in adults with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Marjorie Solomon; Michael J Frank; Anne C Smith; Stanford Ly; Cameron S Carter
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  In reply.

Authors:  Patrick L Purdon; David W Zhou; Oluwaseun Akeju; Emery N Brown
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 7.892

10.  Integrated Bayesian models of learning and decision making for saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Kay H Brodersen; Will D Penny; Lee M Harrison; Jean Daunizeau; Christian C Ruff; Emrah Duzel; Karl J Friston; Klaas E Stephan
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2008-09-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.